As we all know, although the positions of the United States and Russia in Syria are opposite, they are consistent in combating IS extreme armed forces. Including France, it was also the first air strike against IS in Syria recently. Now it seems that Russia does not want to send troops on the ground, but it is also "speaking loudly" like the United States. In fact, it is Putin's cautious and limited intervention to avoid the expansion of the situation, and its purpose is only intervention. As for the effect, it absolutely depends on the needs of the situation and the reaction of the United States. This is definitely a political war.
The fight against IS in Syria shows that Putin is still very smart because it is an enemy of the whole world. There is no reason for the United States to interfere. On the contrary, we can only adopt an encouraging attitude, and Russia will naturally participate in the core of international hot issues. It means that Europe didn't think of a complete solution to the Syrian problem until it encountered a wave of refugees. It is impossible without Russian cooperation. I support the legitimate government and you support the Syrian opposition. Although I support the Bashar government, I have not attacked the Syrian opposition forces you support. The only thing I play is. You can't say that air strikes against IS are your patent.
Therefore, it can be seen from thIS point that the political significance of Russia's air strikes against Syria is far greater than the military significance. It is not to drive IS out of Syria or completely eliminate the "Islamic State", but to express that we should not forget Russia in solving international hot issues. Without Russia's cooperation, the west will not act arbitrarily.
Therefore, we can judge that Putin's air strikes against is in Syria are while the iron is hot. Since military intervention has been announced, certain actions must be taken. Putin has a firm attitude, does not drag his feet, and must do what he looks for. This is his character, resourceful. Therefore, he never frowns at Obama, because he has many clever ways to deal with it, and they are all big moves that are impatient and don't play Tai Chi, and you have to accept them.
Next, it depends on the attitude of the United States. I don't think the United States will react much, because the United States has the ability and doesn't want to get too involved in Syria, otherwise Bashar would have fallen. In the eyes of the United States, the reason why air strikes against IS are limited is to preserve its threat to the Bashar regime in Syria. In the next step, if the United States reacts violently because of Russia's open intervention in Syria, it will be easy to launch a military confrontation with Russia, which is absolutely not in the interest of the United States. I think the next step of the United States can only acquiesce in Russia's strength on the Syrian issue and let Putin enjoy the pleasure of being suppressed for a period of two years.