Case analysis of international trade: cases of intellectual property protection

1) After signing TRIPS, the Indian government should implement measures to further standardize the protection of intellectual property rights in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Members shall implement the provisions of this Agreement without violating the provisions of this Agreement. Members may determine appropriate methods to implement the provisions of this Agreement in their respective legal systems and practices, so as to fulfill their TRIPS obligations.

2) The Indian government has made mistakes in its consideration. The Indian government's main consideration is that China's drug prices fluctuate greatly due to the signing of TRIPS, and other agreements negotiated in Uruguay Round are beneficial to the country. Lack of attention to trade intellectual property rights leads to the ultimate failure to achieve the goal of TRIPS.

3) Ruling: The World Trade Organization ruled that India had not fulfilled the Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, and under the supervision of the World Trade Organization, India made adjustments.

Supplementary information: Patent refers to any invention in all technical fields, whether it is a product invention or a method invention, as long as it is novel, creative and suitable for industrial application, you can apply for a patent.