According to the identification requirements of the Administrative Measures for the Identification of High-tech Enterprises:
Article 2 contains the stipulation that "an enterprise obtains the ownership of intellectual property rights that play a key supporting role in technology for its main products (services) through independent research and development, transferee, donation and merger", so high-tech enterprises must have intellectual property rights to declare, otherwise they will be rejected by one vote!
The reason why there is a patent requirement is because the intellectual property part of high-tech evaluation includes the scoring part. That is, after meeting the basic requirements, they will enter the evaluation and score, with a full score of 100 and a passing score of 70. The higher the score, the easier it is to pass the appraisal.
100 integral includes:
1. Intellectual property 30 points;
2. Technical transformation 30 points;
3. R&D management 20 points;
4. Financial growth of 20 points.
The scoring of intellectual property rights includes several aspects, such as type, quantity, advancement, correlation with main products and acquisition methods. The specific criteria are:
Type and quantity of intellectual property rights (8 points): invention patents are called 1 intellectual property rights, utility model patents and software copyrights are called 2 intellectual property rights. 1 and above 1 intellectual property rights score 7-8, 5-6 for 5 or above 2 intellectual property rights, 3-4 for 3-4 intellectual property rights, 1-2 for 0 intellectual property rights, and 0 for 0 intellectual property rights. Visible, no matter how many utility models, it is impossible to get full marks in this respect.
Advanced degree in technology (8 points): 7-8 points for advanced degree, 5-6 points for advanced degree, 3-4 points for general degree, 0/-2 points for low degree, and 0 point for no advanced degree. In this standard, the invention patent has obvious advantages. However, some high-tech patents can only be applied for utility models because of their own technical characteristics. Therefore, it cannot be absolutely believed that the invention patent must be more advanced. On the contrary, if there are enough utility model patents, the probability of advanced patents is greater.
Relevance (8 points): namely, the role of intellectual property rights in products. Strong correlation 7-8, strong correlation 5-6, general 3-4, weak correlation 1-2, and no correlation 0. Here, the invention patent does not have an advantage. On the contrary, the greater the number of utility model patents, the greater the correlation with the main products.
Method of obtaining intellectual property rights (6 points): independent research and development: 3-6 points, transferee, transferee or merger: 1-3 points. This has nothing to do with the type and quantity of intellectual property rights.
Judging from the scoring standard, the appearance patent is not completely useless, but it does not have much effect on the scoring of intellectual property rights, and can only be counted as a quantity (compared with chicken ribs, but if counted, it does not promote the scoring much); The appearance patent can't be established, and the results can't be transformed.