What if someone complains about infringement when using cad?

When receiving the legal letter from the opposing lawyer about using pirated CAD software, many business leaders (or information directors) panicked, or quickly found a software manufacturer, regardless of the reasonable software performance and price, and bought genuine pirated software first, paying a heavy cost. In fact, sometimes things are not as serious and bad as imagined, and only by calmly coping can we find the best solution. There are several points to know and understand:

1. A fine will be imposed immediately upon receipt of the legal letter. Many enterprises think that they need to be fined immediately after receiving the legal letter. In fact, receiving a legal letter only reminds enterprises that they need to replace genuine software within a certain period of time, and they will start to be fined if they fail to rectify within the time limit;

2. Foreign software manufacturers and their agents are all enterprises and do not have the power of administrative law enforcement. What is important is that as an enterprise, they have no right to visit another enterprise, so they don't have to pay attention to the "high pressure" for them and their agents to buy their software;

After receiving the lawyer's letter, the enterprise should neither be too nervous nor adopt the "ostrich policy", bury its head in the sand and pretend not to see it. Instead, it is necessary to understand solutions through various channels and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises. For example, uninstall pirated software and install genuine software as soon as possible, and the local copyright department will not pursue it again.

4. There are usually two ways to solve the problem of legalization: first, enterprises buy foreign genuine software. Of course, foreign software is expensive, and enterprises need to pay huge economic costs for the subsequent annual upgrade costs and various after-sales expenses; Second, choose domestic software with high cost performance at the price of 1/5, such as Zhongwang CAD and other domestic software, which greatly relieves the purchasing pressure of enterprises. This method is suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises that are not local tyrants.

One thing to note is that if you choose foreign software, there may be information security risks, and foreign software vendors can easily grasp the internal situation of enterprises, thus "kidnapping" and threatening to buy multiple sets of software. Personally, I suggest that more consideration should be given to domestic software to solve the problem of legalization. The Workbook on Using Genuine Software in State-owned Enterprises shows that the so-called "genuine software includes both foreign software and domestic software", regardless of whether the product and the previously illegally installed product belong to the same company, they are genuine. On the other hand, from the perspective of application cost and benefit, a large number of domestic CAD software with independent intellectual property rights, represented by Zhongwang CAD, have emerged in recent years. They can not only meet the use requirements in function and performance, but also be compatible with all foreign mainstream CAD software. They can also process other CAD drawings efficiently and accurately, and have a high cost-effective advantage. Most importantly, domestic Zhongwang CAD software is more self-controllable and more trustworthy than foreign software in information security.