How to treat the cancellation of funding and rewards in the patent and trademark application stage?

The reason why the state will introduce corresponding policies to reduce the financial subsidies in the patent application stage is because there are some problems in the current patent application, and many people use this preferential financial policy to defraud subsidies, so the state stopped the corresponding patent subsidies in order to plug this loophole. Moreover, for the current patent fee, the entire patent fee at the application stage is relatively low. For most companies, when applying for the corresponding major, the expenses they can really bear are very low, but after the current patent application is completed, it is completely negligible compared with the benefits they can get.

Therefore, for most enterprises, if they want to make good use of the corresponding patents, they simply don't care much about the patent cost of this oxygen. On the contrary, for those individuals or enterprises who want to use this system to defraud the corresponding subsidies, their purpose is not to obtain the corresponding patents through their own inventions, but to protect the patents. Therefore, for some patents they applied for, the role they can play is very limited, and it is impossible to promote social progress and development. Therefore, there should be no corresponding subsidies, because for the whole patent application system, if this trend is excessively encouraged, it will be harmful to the development of the whole country and the progress of society.

Therefore, for some enterprises that want to defraud the corresponding subsidies through this loophole, the key is to punish and manage these enterprises, and for those enterprises that really want to protect their R&D and promote innovation through patents, the state should also give corresponding rewards. Only in this way can a good cycle be formed in the whole patent system, otherwise it will cause certain losses to the whole system of our country.