1, (1) The risk of furniture theft shall be borne by the third party. Because the parties did not choose trade terms, the risk of the goods passed at the time of delivery, and the third party did not deliver the goods, so the risk did not pass. (2) A third party cannot ask the buyer to pay the price. Because it has the right and obligation to pay and fails to fulfill its delivery obligation, it has no right to ask the buyer to pay for the goods.
3. According to the provisions of the CISG, the goods delivered by the seller must be goods that a third party cannot claim any rights or requirements based on the intellectual property rights of the buyer's business place or the place where the goods are sold or used as expected in the contract, that is, the seller has the obligation to protect intellectual property rights. Company A violates the obligation to guarantee intellectual property rights, so it is liable for damages to Company B. However, Article 75 of CISG stipulates that "the amount of damages that one party should bear due to its breach of contract shall be equal to the amount of losses, including profits, suffered by the other party due to its breach of contract. The damages shall not exceed the possible losses expected or expected by the breaching party for breach of the contract according to the facts and circumstances it knew or should have known when concluding the contract. " Therefore, the damages undertaken by Company A should not exceed the scope of possible losses expected or reasonably expected in the contract. Therefore, not all the requests of Dutch company B have legal basis.