The statistical standards of talents with technical secondary school education or above and junior professional titles have begun to change after more than 20 years. Wang Communication, president of China Institute of Personnel Science, revealed in an interview yesterday that the new standards of talent statistics are expected to be introduced in September this year, and some new standards will be implemented within the planned year.
According to President Wang Communication, China's current talent statistics standard began at 1982, and the standard defines a talent as "having a technical secondary school education or above and a junior professional title or above". The new standards of talent statistics are not only academic qualifications and professional titles, but also many new statistical standards have been added this time. For example, he said that invention and creation are also a standard of new talent statistics.
It is reported that the new standard puts more emphasis on the statistics of classified talents. Wang Chuang Communication said that the new standards are mainly based on the categories of party and government talents, professional and technical talents and enterprise talents, and the statistical scope of classified talents includes workers and farmers. It is reported that the new standards for talent statistics are still being worked out, and it is expected to be introduced in September this year, and some new standards are planned to be implemented during the year. However, Wang Chuang Communications did not disclose the specific standards.
According to Wang Chuang Communication, too much emphasis on the role of academic qualifications in evaluating talents has led many people to label themselves as talents when they get diplomas, instead of trying to improve their ability and level. Under the current talent standards, what people think is not to fight for grades and contributions, but to fight for academic qualifications and professional titles.
Education and Ability: A Perspective of China's Current Talent Standards
Xinhuanet Shanxi Channel 2004-03-25
"People with technical secondary school education or above and primary professional titles"-1982 established this talent standard in China, which fundamentally reversed the situation of trampling on knowledge and ignoring education in the decade of the Cultural Revolution. However, with the development of society, the connotation of talents in reality has changed greatly. If the talent standard is not corrected in time, it will inevitably affect all aspects of talent selection, evaluation and incentive, and then affect the implementation of this important strategy of strengthening the country through talents.
Too much emphasis on academic qualifications and professional titles, one-sided talent standards.
Speaking of the limitations and mechanization of the current talent standards, Shen Ronghua, director of the Shanghai Institute of Administration and Human Resources and a famous expert on talent issues, cited three examples in one breath:
"Shanghai's talent introduction plan once proposed that only talents with bachelor degree or above should be introduced. By this standard, Bill Gates is not a talent when he comes to Shanghai. Even if he founded the famous Microsoft company, the stock market value is equivalent to the economic aggregate of one and a half Shanghai. Why? Because he didn't finish college. "
"Lin Yuanpei, a famous bridge expert, designed four bridges in Shanghai, namely Yangpu, Nanpu, Xupu and Lupu, which have become representative buildings in Shanghai. However, according to this talent standard, he may not be a talent in Shanghai because he only graduated from secondary school. "
"Less than 30% of Wenzhou private entrepreneurs have academic qualifications and professional titles, but they have created a lot of social wealth, provided a lot of employment opportunities and made great contributions to society. According to the existing talent standards, these entrepreneurs are definitely not talents. "
Shen Ronghua said that there are mediocrities among doctors and talents among workers. If we make talent planning and talent strategy according to academic qualifications and professional titles now, it will be difficult to train, select, introduce and motivate real talents, and the road will certainly get narrower and narrower.
Talent experts are not alarmist. During the period of 1995, Kong Xiangyin, who has not yet obtained his master's and doctor's degrees, won a scholarship from the Max Planck Institute in Germany and went to the Max Planck Institute for postdoctoral research. 1997 he heard that there was an urgent need for biological talents in China and decided to return to work. Only after he came back did he realize how naive his decision was: because his highest degree was undergraduate, almost no unit was willing to accept him. After a few months of "wandering", the head of the Shanghai Bioengineering Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has a unique eye and arranged for him to engage in genetic research.
Kong Xiangyin later proved the short-sightedness of academic scholars with his first-class achievements: in a short period of four or five years, he and his collaborators discovered a series of disease-related genes and published many papers in internationally renowned academic journals. His research was supported by the National Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and the National 863 Program, and his achievements also won many patents and national natural science awards.
"Just look at academic qualifications, not ability. The current talent standards are too mechanical and too one-sided." Kong Xiangyin sighed when he mentioned that terrible day. "If we don't adjust this standard in time, we will definitely bury many talents with sufficient ability but insufficient education. Some people with insufficient ability but sufficient education will waste a lot of valuable research resources."
The root of the proliferation of fake diplomas lies in talent standards.
In recent years, the proliferation of fake diplomas has become a major public hazard. "Some people do not hesitate to resort to deceit in order to obtain higher education; Some people have their hair permed to get a job title. The occurrence of these phenomena is directly related to unscientific talent standards. " As a talent expert, Shen Ronghua's words hit the nail on the head.
Wang Communication, director of the Personnel Research Institute of the Ministry of Personnel and a well-known expert on talent issues, said that over-emphasis on the role of academic qualifications in evaluating talents has led many people to label themselves as talents in order to get a diploma, instead of trying to improve their ability and level. "Under the current talent standards, what people think is not to fight for achievements and contributions, but to fight for academic qualifications and professional titles."
The confession of a grass-roots cadre who successfully "infiltrated" the undergraduate course also confirms the expert's point of view from the side. "I worked in villages and towns for 20 years and finally became a director in the county. I hoped to continue to' go up', but the diploma became the biggest obstacle. Because of the above regulations, county-level cadres should have a bachelor's degree or above, and I just graduated from high school. Finally, I reported to the correspondence school of the provincial party Committee in the county. Three years later, I successfully got my undergraduate diploma and became a deputy county-level cadre. I got my diploma, but my knowledge level hasn't changed. What I changed was only the academic qualifications on my resume. "
"We equate education with talent. Without education, we are not talents, which leads to the exchange of money and education, the exchange of rights, and the commercialization of diplomas. " Gu Haibing, a professor at the School of Public Administration of Renmin University of China, said, "Its outstanding performance is that a few lawless elements sell a large number of fake diplomas in front of key universities, and some people with real talents and practical knowledge are forced to buy fake diplomas; Some colleges and universities hold a large number of graduate classes, lower the standards, and grant many students with certain status master's degrees in batches; Individual officials or entrepreneurs have obtained doctoral degrees without rigorous examinations and writing papers. "
Although a series of measures have been taken to curb fake diplomas, experts believe that if we don't start with the "ruler" to correct the current talent standards, then these measures will only cure the symptoms, not the root cause.
Developed countries that attach importance to ability and performance get out of the misunderstanding of "only academic qualifications"
How should China build a new talent standard? Experts such as Shen Ronghua believe that some practices of developed countries are worth learning:
The United States put forward "performance management" in the 1960s, emphasizing that performance is an important criterion for evaluating talents. In the 20th century, it proposed to create an economy based on human capital, and designed new performance and ability standards. Britain, which gives the world a conservative impression, has also adjusted its talent policy in recent years, and the definition of talent is no longer limited to those who have obtained master's degrees or above; Japan, which has always attached importance to academic qualifications and qualifications, has clearly put forward "ability" in personnel reform and cancelled academic statistics.
According to Shen Ronghua's analysis, because higher education in developed countries has already entered the stage of "popularization" and "popularization", their definition of talent standards has gone out of the misunderstanding of "only academic qualifications" and mainly emphasizes "two orientations":
The first is ability orientation. Although we should consider the academic qualifications and professional titles of talents, we should highlight their comprehensive ability and professional level in order to be truly competent. Because a person's comprehensive quality, it is difficult to use academic qualifications to reflect. If a graduate of a famous university can't make achievements in five years, it's hard to say that he is a talent.
The second is performance orientation. In a competitive environment, performance is very important, because only performance can distinguish a person from other competitors. Education can only be a small part of natural ability, showing a person's potential at most. To evaluate talents, we should not only look at the diploma and the university he graduated from, but also look at his contribution to society and his achievements.
Gu Haibing said that civil servants in developed countries do not pursue high education, and even high-tech enterprises do not pursue high education. For example, the State Council's requirements for recruiting diplomats are extremely relaxed, requiring only high school education or above; Of the 3,544 advertisements for science and technology jobs published in a major American newspaper, 2,799 did not require any academic qualifications, only 206 required bachelor's degrees and only 77 required master's degrees.
Rebuild the talent standard and change "education standard" into "ability standard"
The report of the 16th National Congress of the Communist Party of China put forward the major policy of "respecting labor, knowledge, talents and creation". "Its core is to respect labor, and its essence is to respect talents." Shen Ronghua believes that "although this policy does not propose new talent standards, according to its spirit, the new talent standards should include not only' emerging' talents, but also' potential' talents; It should cover not only talents with academic qualifications and titles, but also talents without academic qualifications and titles but with specialized skills. "
"According to this theory, our new talent standard should be: people who have certain knowledge or skills, can carry out creative work and make positive contributions to the construction of material civilization, political civilization and spiritual civilization." Shen Ronghua said that the new standard may or may not have concepts such as academic qualifications and professional titles, but it must be changed from academic qualifications to competency-based, and talents should be placed in the process of economic and social development to measure the value of social creation, thus forming a social atmosphere of "being content with the status quo and fidgeting" in which everyone talks about creation and everyone contributes, and promoting continuous social progress.
Many experts said that the new concept of talents should at least include the following three types of talents: the first category is party and government talents, enterprise management talents and professional and technical talents; The second category is senior skilled personnel; The third category is other talents who create value for society. The new talent evaluation criteria should be based on the degree of market recognition of talents, focusing on the size of ability and performance, and taking the level of salary as an important reference.
It is imperative to rebuild talent standards and speed up the establishment of talent statistical index system. "This system must break through the limitations of defining talents only by academic qualifications and professional titles under the planned economy system and reflect the ability-oriented talent standards under the market economy system." Shen Ronghua said, "Specifically, it includes three elements: one is the knowledge element, that is, the education level; The second is the ability factor, that is, experience; The third is the performance factor, that is, the contribution. "
Education and ability, who is in charge of ups and downs?
Recently found such a post:
"I am a computer student myself, and I am not satisfied with what I have learned at school. Not at work at all. It's called foundation, but I think if you want to make a difference in the company, you still have to rely on your own ability. Where does my ability come from? Of course, it is the latest knowledge and your own qualifications. For college students or undergraduates who have just left school, they won't know this. In the IT industry, it is not who has a high diploma, but who has the ability to complete a certain project or task. Often many companies can't see the performance of an undergraduate student after he is hired, which fully proves that in the IT industry, the ability should be put first, and the degree of diploma doesn't mean anything, because computer is a new discipline, especially the network, which can't be compared with politics, language, mathematics and other disciplines. Its development is also n times that of these disciplines. Companies that want to recruit it should pay attention to this and break the traditional thinking. As long as the applicants who can bring economic benefits to the company are good employees, don't treat them differently because of their diplomas. "
Many people replied that they felt the same way, so which is more important, education or ability? Ideally, anyone can answer more than their education. However, when this question is put into concrete matters, the answer becomes complicated. After all, there is still a gap between ideal and reality.
Recognize the rules of the game
Although everyone is looking forward to the arrival of spring, the recession in the IT industry has become an indisputable fact. At present, the supply and demand of IT talents exceeds the demand. Some enterprises will receive hundreds or even thousands of letters of appointment when recruiting a position, which naturally improves the entry threshold. The same work experience, one is an undergraduate and the other is a master. Enterprises will choose high academic qualifications. This is competition. Competition is cruel and has no reason. These phenomena are particularly serious in some well-known enterprises. At the beginning of this year, Motorola announced that it would only recruit master students. The rule of the game now is that enterprises have the right to choose you, while individuals are selected in most cases unless you are really excellent.
Ms. Wang, a headhunter, believes that education is a very important condition for enterprises to select talents from advertising recruitment, not in the first place, but also in the second place. But if it is recommended by headhunters, the situation will be slightly better. Judging from the trust in the long-term cooperation of headhunters, the company may accept a talent whose academic qualifications do not meet the requirements, but who is strongly recommended by headhunters. However, if you don't have enough education, you must have outstanding performance in your field of work, such as special achievements or good job training after receiving it. However, it is by no means ordinary people who can be recommended by headhunters. They have skipped the stage of looking for a job.
Moreover, opportunities are very important in the process of finding a job. Enterprises will receive many application letters when recruiting positions. HR will set some necessary conditions to screen resumes before reading them, such as screening out undergraduate degrees. Obviously, education is a hard indicator. If you don't have the required education, you won't have a chance to show others your ability. No matter how strong you are, you can only miss this position.
On the other hand, I can make a suitable study method at school. After work, although the learning content has changed, the method is still universal. In fact, this is also a kind of ability acquisition. A good method is like a good weapon, which enables you to work and study easily. Therefore, it is understandable that enterprises have certain requirements for academic qualifications when recruiting positions. Of course, this is not to say that people with insufficient education can't do anything, but that people with education can do everything. People with insufficient education can find their own learning methods after a certain process, but this process may be more painful and complicated.
Education is just the beginning.
Education will provide you with some opportunities at the beginning of job hunting, but if you are not capable, it will be in vain. As we all know, what we learn in school is only the basic knowledge, and the cultivation of our main ability lies in the accumulation of work. And these accumulated experiences are the acceleration of your future career. There is a saying that it is never too old to learn, and that is the truth.
Mr. Zhou, a veteran in the IT industry, believes that academic qualifications must be considered when selecting talents, because it determines the overall knowledge structure and quality level of the company, but this is not the only reference. When recruiting, enterprises will consider whether it is suitable for corporate culture, personal conduct, ability, education and so on in order of priority. Obviously, education only accounts for a quarter, ranking behind ability.
The author has done some job salary surveys and found that the salary of a job may be related to academic qualifications at first, but with the growth of work experience and the improvement of personal ability, academic qualifications have been placed in a secondary position. What determines your career fate and salary at this time is your work experience, not your ability. Of course, work experience here is not equal to work experience, but accumulated experience, handling methods, management ability and so on. The accumulation of experience is also a hard process, and constant accumulation will bring constant acceleration.
Who was the first person to dream big?
Education, to put it bluntly, is the product of the current education system and a sign to measure the knowledge learned, but it is certainly not the only sign. There is a kind of person who is born smart and of high quality. The so-called self-taught people, such as Einstein and Edison, are not bound by this system, but only a handful can achieve great things. Such people should belong to a minority.
The vast majority of the rest received this systematic education step by step, from primary school to middle school and even university. Some "orthodox people" begin to understand things very early, know how to do the right things at the right stage, work very hard and smoothly, pay attention to the cultivation of ability in their work, and move towards their goals step by step. As long as there is an opportunity, they can gallop up and down and distribute their spirit.
Another part of people, leaving school also means ending their study career, and they can't make ends meet with their degrees all day. They may not understand, or don't want to understand, that ability is more important than diploma, so let nature take its course. Even if such a person is glamorous for a while, he can't stand the choice of time, and it is very likely that even survival will be a problem in the end. For these people, the lesson is: don't think that everything will be fine with a degree. Who doesn't know that there is a world behind us? The cultivation of ability and the accumulation of experience are the lifelong career of successful people.
Others are the biggest victims of academic qualifications and ability problems. Usually they have a skill in a certain field, but this ability comes from their hobbies in a certain field; At the same time, due to various reasons, education has become a disadvantage for them to apply for jobs. They often do the same job as people with high academic qualifications, but their income is not as good as the latter. Naturally, we have an unbalanced mentality and begin to blame others, the injustice of the world and the unrealistic education system, and laugh at the incompetence of those with academic qualifications. As we all know, there is no absolute justice in this world. If you don't have enough education, you must work harder than others and overcome more difficulties in the process of job hunting and even in the future life. Faced with this situation, they can strengthen their ability experience. Excellence is not enough, it must be excellent, so that everyone in the professional field can recognize and admire it; You can also take a step back and consider taking another degree. Since education is a hurdle in job hunting, the most important thing for job seekers is to correct their attitude towards life and find ways to cross this hurdle. No matter how you complain and lament, nothing will change.
Who was the first person to dream big? The visionary is the winner!
Entry depends on academic qualifications, and success depends on ability.
Miss Li: Hello, I want to ask an old-fashioned question: which is more important, education or work ability? I used to be the head of the advertising marketing planning department of an internet company. After working for about a year and a half, I should say that I still have some achievements. But recently I have a new director. He used to be a salesman and didn't know how to plan, but he told me how to do it. I really can't stand it. I tried to communicate with him several times, and he was very strong, so I resigned.
I'm going to apply for a big portal, and they require a bachelor's degree or above. Even so, maybe they took a fancy to my past work performance and ability, and I was hired. However, the treatment is still different from that of undergraduates, and the psychology is very uncomfortable. And I always feel insecure. Although my own ability is very strong, big companies seem to attach great importance to academic qualifications, and I feel under great pressure. What should I do? I hope you can give me some advice.
Xiao Wang
Hello, Xiao Wang:
I think the main reason why you are confused is that you don't have the big diploma that employers need. Although your ability is not worse than that of undergraduates, you will often feel insecure and lacking. You will unconsciously attribute the problem of diploma to the problem of unsatisfactory work or treatment. In that case, you have to invest some time and energy to get a big diploma. With your ability, it shouldn't be difficult.
Which is more important, education or ability? Both are important. Entry depends on academic qualifications, and success depends on ability. Now that you have entered the big website, you have entered the door. The next step depends on your ability. As for the salary, it's normal that people don't know enough about your ability when they first enter, and they may give you a lower salary. But this does not represent the future. You should have confidence in yourself. I wish you success!
Which is more important, education or ability? Some college graduates, after joining the work, find that there is a gap between themselves and graduate students in theory or research ability, so they think they should go back to campus for further study. More distress comes from some college graduates. Due to the current situation that the supply of college graduates exceeds the demand in the job market, many employers have a phenomenon of high consumption of talents. Even some of the most basic job recruitment conditions indicate that candidates must have a bachelor's degree or above.
As we can see, although Xiao Wang did not have a bachelor's degree, he was hired because he had the qualities and abilities required by the employer. Therefore, for employers, academic qualifications are only a reference condition for selecting talents, not an absolute condition. If you have real talent and practical knowledge, you may be hired by the employer. More and more enterprise human resources managers are aware of this problem: academic qualifications can only represent a person's past learning ability, but not a person's practical ability. And an employer can't know everyone's ability like the palm of his hand in a short time, so a diploma has become the basic standard to measure a person's ability when recruiting.
Excerpted from Absolute Challenge in the Workplace, the author of this book has many years of experience in enterprise human resource management. "Absolute Challenge in the Workplace" tells some hidden rules in the workplace, which were not found in previous career guidance books, and the examples are vivid and appropriate. This book not only tells us what to do, but also tells us why to do it.
I have something to say about education and ability.
Sender: cchan74 10 (miserable)
Organizer: yerk(2004-07- 14 05:55:49), letter in the station.
Hehe, in fact, there are too many people who have no academic qualifications but have achieved success through their own efforts and studies. The author won't ignore these people, will he?
I know many people. They know that their educational background is lower than others and their starting point is lower than others, so they work harder. In the end, people with high academic qualifications and high positions become their subordinates, and they can also use their own abilities to subdue the undergraduate and master students below.
I'm ashamed. I started as an account director and worked in the advertising industry for 8 years. Now I am the vice president of an international advertising company in 4A. Just graduated from vocational school, graduated from two-year college night school. My account managers are all college students, and their English is worse than mine. My suggestion is better than theirs (whether in Chinese or English). I don't even have an English exam certificate.
All marketing theories and advertising theories are studied on the job, and then I buy books to learn. I think there are more books on advertising and marketing on my bookshelf than any MBA. So is my friend.
The so-called elite does not mean how strong the academic qualifications are, but how to prove themselves and enhance their value in the process of work.
Later, when I came to work, no one ever asked me about my education, because talking with me had made my boss forget my education.
What if you have a degree? Less than 10% can be applied in work, and 90% need to continue to explore and learn. And you should learn from your real position, not from any training courses. Of course, attending a training class is a good method of self-proliferation, but you also need to buy your own books. There is a difference between compulsory and non-compulsory.
"Education" does not mean "learning ability", but a summary of your study in different stages, which does not mean that you are better than others.
Wake up, the author of this article, you are really naive. Have you ever tried to sit in a big chair and consider the future and cohesion of the company? Have you ever tried to worry about the imbalance between cost, output and income of the company? Have you been cornered by ambitious subordinates? I can tell you that the skills of those who sit at the top are not learned from college, but accumulated in actual combat.
Don't be fooled into thinking that you have a degree. You are paralyzed. Those people see through your mind.
Those who have academic qualifications but do not participate in actual combat are academic. These people are politically and economically marginalized and occasionally put on the table to quote classics. Their theory was referred by the actual combat school and then put into practice, but they could never set foot in the core of power.
I woke up with a highly educated and dreamy classmate.
Education and Ability: A Perspective of China's Current Talent Standards
"People with technical secondary school education or above and primary professional titles"-1982 established this talent standard in China, which fundamentally reversed the situation of trampling on knowledge and ignoring education in the decade of the Cultural Revolution. However, with the development of society, the connotation of talents in reality has changed greatly. If the talent standard is not corrected in time, it will inevitably affect all aspects of talent selection, evaluation and incentive, and then affect the implementation of this important strategy of strengthening the country through talents.
Too much emphasis on academic qualifications and professional titles, one-sided talent standards.
Speaking of the limitations and mechanization of the current talent standards, Shen Ronghua, director of the Shanghai Institute of Administration and Human Resources and a famous expert on talent issues, cited three examples in one breath:
"Shanghai's talent introduction plan once proposed that only talents with bachelor degree or above should be introduced. By this standard, Bill Gates is not a talent when he comes to Shanghai. Even if he founded the famous Microsoft company, the stock market value is equivalent to the economic aggregate of one and a half Shanghai. Why? Because he didn't finish college. "
Lin Yuanpei, a famous bridge expert, designed four bridges in Shanghai, namely Yangpu, Nanpu, Xupu and Lupu, which have become representative buildings in Shanghai. But according to this talent standard, he may not be a talent in Shanghai, because he just graduated from a technical secondary school. "
"Less than 30% of Wenzhou private entrepreneurs have academic qualifications and professional titles, but they have created a lot of social wealth, provided a lot of employment opportunities and made great contributions to society. According to the existing talent standards, these entrepreneurs are definitely not talents. "
Shen Ronghua said that there are mediocrities among doctors and talents among workers. If we make talent planning and talent strategy according to academic qualifications and professional titles now, it will be difficult to train, select, introduce and motivate real talents, and the road will certainly get narrower and narrower.
Talent experts are not alarmist. During the period of 1995, Kong Xiangyin, who has not yet obtained his master's and doctor's degrees, won a scholarship from the Max Planck Institute in Germany and went to the Max Planck Institute for postdoctoral research. 1997 he heard that there was an urgent need for biological talents in China and decided to return to work. Only after he came back did he realize how naive his decision was: because his highest degree was undergraduate, almost no unit was willing to accept him. After a few months of "wandering", the head of the Shanghai Bioengineering Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences has a unique eye and arranged for him to engage in genetic research.
Kong Xiangyin later proved the short-sightedness of academic scholars with his first-class achievements: in a short period of four or five years, he and his collaborators discovered a series of disease-related genes and published many papers in internationally renowned academic journals. His research was supported by the National Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars and the National 863 Program, and his achievements also won many patents and national natural science awards.
"Just look at academic qualifications, not ability. The current talent standards are too mechanical and too one-sided." Kong Xiangyin sighed when he mentioned that terrible day. "If we don't adjust this standard in time, we will definitely bury many talents with sufficient ability but insufficient education. Some people with insufficient ability but sufficient education will waste a lot of valuable research resources."
The root of the proliferation of fake diplomas lies in talent standards.
In recent years, the proliferation of fake diplomas has become a major public hazard. "Some people do not hesitate to resort to deceit in order to obtain higher education; Some people have their hair permed to get a job title. The occurrence of these phenomena is directly related to unscientific talent standards. " As a talent expert, Shen Ronghua's words hit the nail on the head.
Wang Communication, director of the Personnel Research Institute of the Ministry of Personnel and a well-known expert on talent issues, said that over-emphasis on the role of academic qualifications in evaluating talents has led many people to label themselves as talents in order to get a diploma, instead of trying to improve their ability and level. "Under the current talent standards, what people think is not to fight for achievements and contributions, but to fight for academic qualifications and professional titles."
The confession of a grass-roots cadre who successfully "infiltrated" the undergraduate course also confirms the expert's point of view from the side. "I worked in villages and towns for 20 years and finally became a director in the county. I hoped to continue to' go up', but the diploma became the biggest obstacle. Because of the above regulations, county-level cadres should have a bachelor's degree or above, and I just graduated from high school. Finally, I reported to the correspondence school of the provincial party Committee in the county. Three years later, I successfully got my undergraduate diploma and became a deputy county-level cadre. I got my diploma, but my knowledge level hasn't changed. What I changed was only the academic qualifications on my resume. "
"We equate education with talent. Without education, we are not talents, which leads to the exchange of money and education, the exchange of rights, and the commercialization of diplomas. " Gu Haibing, a professor at the School of Public Administration of Renmin University of China, said, "Its outstanding performance is that a few lawless elements sell a large number of fake diplomas in front of key universities, and some people with real talents and practical knowledge are forced to buy fake diplomas; Some colleges and universities hold a large number of graduate classes, lower the standards, and grant many students with certain status master's degrees in batches; Individual officials or entrepreneurs have obtained doctoral degrees without rigorous examinations and writing papers. "
Although a series of measures have been taken to curb fake diplomas, experts believe that if we don't start with the "ruler" to correct the current talent standards, then these measures will only cure the symptoms, not the root cause.
Developed countries that attach importance to ability and performance get out of the misunderstanding of "only academic qualifications"
How should China build a new talent standard? Experts such as Shen Ronghua believe that some practices of developed countries are worth learning:
The United States put forward "performance management" in the 1960s, emphasizing that performance is an important criterion for evaluating talents. In the 20th century, it proposed to create an economy based on human capital, and designed new performance and ability standards. Britain, which gives the world a conservative impression, has also adjusted its talent policy in recent years, and the definition of talent is no longer limited to those who have obtained master's degrees or above; Japan, which has always attached importance to academic qualifications and qualifications, has clearly put forward "ability" in personnel reform and cancelled academic statistics.
According to Shen Ronghua's analysis, higher education in developed countries has already entered "popularization" and "popularization"