As early as 20 18, an American company named Autel Robotics accused Shenzhen DJI Innovation Technology Co., Ltd. of infringing its patent according to Article 337 of the US Patent Law, and demanded to issue a limited exclusion order and injunction. After nearly two years of investigation, the United States announced the results of the investigation on DJI, and the final ruling was that it would not issue a ban. ?
So, who is the victim of DJI company? Who is this Daotong robot? It turns out that this company is not a foreign company, but an organization established by Shenzhen Daotong Intelligent in the United States. It was founded on 20 14, and its main business is shooting technology of quadcopter and unmanned aerial vehicle, which basically determines that it is in direct competition with DJI. It is not difficult to understand why DJI products should be restricted.
Some netizens believe that at the moment of the outbreak of the epidemic, we should hold a group to keep warm instead of killing each other. Only by helping each other in the same boat can we tide over the difficulties and gain an advantage, even an absolute advantage, in external competition. However, such behavior will lead to disputes between the two companies and eventually lead to mutual cancellation of market share.
Some netizens believe that this is a typical market behavior, not a political behavior. The most important purpose of enterprises is to make profits, not to do things related to politics. The approach of Shenzhen Daotong Intelligent is correct, and it is believed that it is necessary to file a lawsuit if it violates its own rights and interests. Only in this way can we better safeguard our own rights and promote our own development.
Shenzhen Daotong Intelligent has a strong awareness of rights protection and is worthy of recognition. After all, your rights and interests can only be maintained by yourself. This is a commercial enterprise, and there is nothing wrong with asserting its own rights and interests without endangering the state and the law. As for those who stand on the moral high ground, you don't have to pay attention to them. what do you think?