Others think that there is no living Lei Feng in business. "At present, Tesla has only announced a vague concept, but what is certain is that no company will contribute its core technology selflessly."
Others believe that Tesla's patent opening will objectively accelerate the development of electric vehicles and lower industry barriers, but it will strengthen rather than weaken Tesla's leading position.
Some people even think that once patents are used by other automobile enterprises, the commercial benefits of non-patented technology transfer are enormous.
According to American media reports, Musk reiterated that "Tesla is very happy to enjoy the super charging network with other automakers, but the vehicles need to meet the standards of super chargers, and also require automakers to accept our business model of no charge." In other words, with Tesla charging technology, it is necessary to "cut the foot and fit the shoes" and change the technology of electric vehicles themselves, not to mention who can accept the free charging mode. The electric vehicle industry in China has begun to take shape, and the products of many key enterprises have been listed in batches, and product standards have become a fixed model. In the future, we will rely on our own strength to implement the rapid promotion of the market and thoughtful charging services, so we will not be subject to people in charging and other aspects.
However, there are objective reasons for this situation. With the rise of the wave of electric vehicles, countries began to formulate electric vehicle standards and charging standards, but generally later than the application of Tesla technology. In 2009, Tesla established a relatively complete product technology system and charging technology system. In 20 12, the super charging station was built on a large scale according to its own charging technical standards.
Tesla's previous project promotion in China failed to get the support of State Grid. Self-built charging stations and charging piles can only isolate themselves from China, a socialized new energy market. The larger the scale of product sales in the future, the farther away it will be from China's new energy society, and it will be difficult to integrate into it, resulting in high cost and isolation. Technical standards are different from "national standards" of various countries. Musk can only face two choices: one is to change his own standards, give up ten years of technical accumulation, and be consistent with the "national standard"; The second is to win over other enterprises, form market standards and fight against "national standards".
Tesla has opened 97 "super charging stations" in North America to ensure that car owners can drive all the way from the east coast to the west coast. These power stations use solar energy to generate electricity. In fact, solar power supply is the most ideal mode for electric vehicles. If thermal power is used for power supply, electric vehicles will play an environmental protection role.
Others believe that Tesla patents are not without positive significance. The construction and operation cost of China charging station is high. It is reported that Shenzhen charging station loses130,000 yuan every year. If Tesla patented technology is adopted to effectively control the construction and operation costs of charging stations, charging facilities can be guaranteed to enter a virtuous circle. Tesla's super charging technology and battery control technology are worth learning, and not all enterprises will be indifferent to these readily available patented technologies. Coupled with Tesla's localized production, charging facilities are shared with enterprises, and all patents are open for free. I believe it is difficult for ordinary enterprises to resist. However, Tesla did not say that it would open battery control technology.