Because there are too many patented technologies involved in the 5G network, many companies have 5G technologies, so all communication companies will have a cross-licensing agreement, that is, Huawei will use Qualcomm's patents and Qualcomm Huawei's patents and patent fees will be specifically negotiated.
But other mobile phone manufacturers are not so good. After Qualcomm obtained the decision on the 5G standard, he couldn't wait to announce the charging standard for the use of 5G patents: the patent utilization rate of single-mode 5G mobile phones was 2.275%; The patent utilization rate of multi-mode (3G/4G/5G) mobile phones is 3.25%. As before, the patent fee charged by Qualcomm is calculated according to the price of the whole machine. In other words, in addition to electronic components unrelated to Qualcomm, such as 5G network modules, panels, speakers and memory chips, Qualcomm will also take away certain patent fees.
Let's work out an account. Considering network compatibility, almost all future 5G mobile phones must be multi-mode designs (mobile phones that can be used under 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G networks). Therefore, for every 100 yuan sold, Qualcomm will be given 3.25 yuan. According to the current domestic average price of 3,000 yuan in flagship machine, every mobile phone manufacturer sells a mobile phone, it has to pay a patent fee of 97.5 yuan to Qualcomm. Multiplied by global mobile phone shipments, how much can Qualcomm earn in a year? No wonder the United States deliberately suppressed the development of Huawei 5 G.
Now, let's discuss the next question. Why did Qualcomm get more patents than Huawei?
In fact, 5G patents are divided into non-core patents and core patents. Although the number of patents in Qualcomm is small, most of them are core patents, which means that the 5G network cannot be separated from Qualcomm. Although Huawei has an absolute advantage in the number of patents, its core patents are not as many as those in Qualcomm. Many countries can build 5G networks even if they exclude Huawei.
On the other hand, it is impossible for future 5G mobile phones to only support 5G networks. Generally speaking, backward compatible 4G/3G or even 2G signals will be needed unless the domestic 2/3/4G network is shut down. Especially in CDMA, Qualcomm has 30% patents. Unless China Telecom can give up CDMA completely, it will still have to pay royalties to Qualcomm.
As the world's largest manufacturer of communication equipment, Huawei has received too little respect. The United States tried to suppress Huawei, but it was indifferent at home. Finally, patriotic enterprises took the lead in supporting Huawei, but they were scolded by netizens. Is this really good?
Support Huawei, support domestic production, and start with us!
Yes
20 16 International Communication Conference voted on the 5G standard. As we all know, Qualcomm won Huawei, but the victory was only one vote away. There is definitely nothing wrong with "Qualcomm is the winner", and standards mean the key to patents. On the surface, Huawei's patents in the field of 5G are second to none, but Qualcomm has obtained the 5G standard and Huawei has obtained the international standard of 5G short code. The cross-use of patents of both parties is inevitable, but the patent of Qualcomm is more critical.
At present, Qualcomm has announced the licensing fees for single-mode and multi-mode patents, which occupy the main road and naturally have considerable pricing initiative. Qualcomm's patent licensing is an important revenue model, which holds the 5G standard. In addition, it has advantages in 2G, 3G and 4G. Although the patent advantage in the 5G era has been weakened, the mobile phone at each stage should not be single-mode but multi-mode. In this case, the patent fees paid by Huawei to Qualcomm will be greater than those obtained from Qualcomm.
Huawei's 5G patent ranks first in the world. Huawei currently owns 148 1 5G patented technologies, accounting for 28.90% of the world, ranking first, while Samsung and Qualcomm own 18% and 15% of the world's patented technologies respectively. In terms of the number of patented technologies, Huawei is superior to Samsung and Qualcomm.
However, Qualcomm mainly focused on core technologies, especially in 2G, 3G and 4G, and accumulated a large number of technologies and patents. 5G mobile phones need to be backward compatible and incompatible. After 5G comes out, 2, 3 and 4G mobile phones and base stations will be eliminated, which is neither objective nor realistic. Generally speaking, in the 5G era, Qualcomm still has a lot of patent fees to collect.
Huawei must pay the patent fee to Qualcomm because it needs Qualcomm's patent, but Qualcomm doesn't need Huawei's patent. To put it simply, Qualcomm is a professional technology development company, which earns huge profits from patent fees.
Huawei itself is a hardware manufacturer. In the process of manufacturing hardware, many patented technologies need to be used, so patent fees need to be paid to other patented enterprises. However, when paying with other hardware manufacturers, other hardware manufacturers also use Huawei's patents. The patents of both parties authorize each other, and Huawei has more patents as a whole, or patents are more important, adding and subtracting each other. Then other companies need to pay Huawei patent royalties. For example, companies such as Apple and Samsung have to pay patent fees to Huawei.
Qualcomm doesn't produce hardware, so it only has authorization, not authorization, so Huawei has to pay the patent fee to Qualcomm.
In the field of 5G, Huawei currently owns the largest number of patents in the world, and has to pay patent fees to Qualcomm. Although Qualcomm only accounts for 15% of the total number of 5G patents, most of them are core patents, which means that using 5G technology can't avoid Qualcomm's core patents.
In terms of 5G patent fees, Huawei will have many benefits, but these benefits will be greatly reduced through mutual authorization. It is inevitable to pay patents to Qualcomm. However, Huawei is likely to become the number one mobile phone seller in the world, and its profits are more worthy of attention.
There is a lot of noise in the comments, so I'd better be specific so that everyone can understand clearly. Huawei didn't lose to Qualcomm by one vote. At that time, 3gpp voted to support the 5g standard, and the mainstream was divided into four schemes: 1 only using LDPC 2 and only using POLAR 3 turbo long code +LDPC short code 4 LDPC long code +POLAR short code. (LDPC Qualcomm, Nokia, Samsung and other technologies are mainly promoted by polar China, while turbo is mainly promoted by orange Ericsson. ) At the 86th meeting, the scheme 1 voted by Qualcomm camp only used LDPC, and only Huawei's own scheme 1 was voted by polar alone, while the scheme 3 voted by LG, NEC and ORANGE used Turbo long code +LDPC short code, represented by ZTE, Xiaomi, Spreadtrum and MediaTek. At the 86th meeting, Lenovo voted for 1 instead of Option 4. Lenovo really deserves to be scolded for making political mistakes, but this meeting only confirmed the long-code LDPC. Objectively speaking, the advantages of long code LDPC technology are too great for polar to reach. The short code control code was postponed to the 87th meeting. At the 87th meeting, Lenovo lost its way, and both the short code and the control code were voted polar (I will release the recorded picture of the 87th meeting at the end). It's a pity that polar only won the control code, not the short code, but it's biased to follow suit and say that Huawei only lost one vote to Qualcomm because Lenovo didn't vote for Huawei, and Lenovo didn't have the ability at all.
In addition, there are not only China manufacturers, but also many European and American manufacturers such as ADI, Infineon and Broadcom. In the list supporting China manufacturers to adopt polarity codes for control channel short codes. This also shows that we can't simply think that polar regions are equal to China and LDPC is equal to foreign countries.
By the way, the electronic products I used, computers: Lenovo, MSI, aliens, Lenovo's heat dissipation is too poor, and it needs radiators and fans in summer, so it was eliminated. The game performance of MSI is ok, and the mold is rough. I have used my keyboard for more than half a year, but some keys can't be played. Shaped lights are cool, but expensive and heavy. Second-hand mobile phones: Apple 6, Huawei mate7, Xiaomi 8SE, Samsung note8 E8. Apple has used the system smoothly for several years, but the battery is so bad that it cannot be separated from the charging cable. Mate7 My father used 1 month for more than two years. He said it was ok, but it was too stuck, so he changed it. Xiaomi's time is too short. I don't feel anything at present, and the price/performance ratio is ok. Samsung NOTE E8E8, used for a year without card, but the price dropped too fast, and the low cost performance was not cost-effective.
Finally, post two 3gpp meeting minutes. PS: 2 code scheme is a long code LDPC+ short code polar coordinate scheme. If you are not familiar with English, you can look it up in the dictionary or ask your friends to help you look at the pictures and see 87 winning tickets. Personally, I don't support the American Emperor Conscience Garbage Enterprise Association, but it's not Huawei licking dogs. I just think that many people are joking just because of hearsay, so I send out the information I spent time reading officially from an objective angle. If you have different opinions, we can discuss the information slowly. When you open your mouth, there is no one to accompany you. Patriotism is very important, as an individual, independent thinking is equally important.
The 5G standard war has come to an end, and the distribution of patent fees has basically settled. In the future, when using 5G technology in mobile phones, we should submit it to several R&D departments such as Qualcomm, Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia. The above companies may also pay each other patent fees.
Among them, Qualcomm's patent fee is charged like this:
1) A mobile phone that uses the necessary patents of Qualcomm standard and only supports 5G will be charged a patent fee of 2.275%.
2) Mobile phones supporting 3G/4G/5G will be charged a patent fee of 3.25% if they use the necessary patents of Qualcomm standard.
3) Use Qualcomm standard essential patents plus non-standard essential patents, only support 5G mobile phones, and charge a patent fee of 4%.
4) Use Qualcomm standard essential patents plus non-standard essential patents, support 3G/4G/5G mobile phones, and charge a patent fee of 5%.
It can be seen that in the future 5G era, if any mobile phone manufacturer in the world uses Qualcomm's 5G technology, it will need the patent fee of Jiaotong University. Huawei is no exception.
Some people say that Huawei has developed its own 5G technology, and I will use my own technology in the future. Why should I pay royalties to Qualcomm? Because Qualcomm, Huawei, Ericsson and Nokia all had the share of 5G technology in the global unified 5G scheme voting last year. For example, if the long code specifies Qualcomm, then all manufacturers in the world must use the long code from Qualcomm, and this part of the patent fee will be collected by Qualcomm. Huawei cannot violate this decision.
Huawei can also charge royalties. Some media reported that the patent fee for using Huawei's 5g technology is 4%, and the official has never come forward to admit it. Therefore, it is impossible to determine specific standards. But it's already very good. For example, in the future, Huawei will charge a 4% patent fee for a 4000-yuan 5g mobile phone, and will earn 160 yuan.
With association, there is no hope for mankind.
Di Mei conscience
Traitor Liu Chuanzhi
Huawei also needs to pay royalties to Qualcomm, because Huawei's chips also need to support the basic network of 2g3G, so in this case, it must pay royalties to Qualcomm.
But unlike other mobile phone companies, Huawei will pay less patent fees. Because Huawei has many technology patents, it will form such an agreement with Qualcomm, so Huawei will pay less patent fees than other companies.
Of course, we don't know exactly how much it will cost, because the contracts signed by Qualcomm and various mobile phone companies are confidential.
However, according to information disclosed by Qualcomm, Huawei pays Qualcomm about 8% of Qualcomm's income every year.
Qualcomm's publicly disclosed algorithm is 5% of the retail price of mobile phones. Suppose the price of mobile phone is 1000 yuan. You need to pay Qualcomm an authorization fee of 32.5 yuan.
Because Huawei's shipments are particularly large, it sold 200 million mobile phones this year, so in this case, it only accounts for about 8% of Qualcomm's revenue, indicating that Huawei has paid less than other mobile phone companies.
That's the truth. Qualcomm is a scoundrel in patents.
The above is just my personal opinion. If you have different opinions, please discuss them and leave a message in the comment area.
Qualcomm has obtained the standard of 5G, so will Huawei pay the patent fee to Qualcomm for the 5G mobile phone manufactured in the future?
Let's just say that as long as you mix in CDMA, you can't avoid Qualcomm, that is, you have to pay royalties to Qualcomm. That is to say, no matter what communication technologies such as 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G are, as long as they are in the CDMA field, there is still no way to bypass Qualcomm. If you say that it is more difficult to open up new communication fields, Qualcomm now wants patent fees and does not produce mobile phones.
Now all patents of 5G are divided into two core patented technologies and non-core patented technologies. In the long run, although the number of patents in Qualcomm is not as much as that in Huawei, the number of core patented technologies in Qualcomm is much more than that in Huawei. According to the data, among 5G patents, Huawei accounts for about 20% and Qualcomm accounts for 15%, so even so, Huawei still has to pay the patent fee to Qualcomm.
In fact, among many communication vendors, each vendor has its own core patent, so everyone has come up with a way, that is, cross-authorization. It's very simple. I use your patent, and I also authorize you to mine. Everyone cooperates happily, but this is only in the case of their own patents. If some small companies don't have patents, life will be hard. Moreover, after obtaining the standard of 5G, Qualcomm announced the charging standard of 5G, so as long as it is 3,000 yuan, it needs to pay Qualcomm nearly 100 yuan.
This can explain why the United States has suppressed Huawei so much, because only first-class companies are the standard setters and others are the executors. So don't hesitate to support Huawei. What's your different view on Qualcomm's 5G standard? Please leave a message below and discuss it together!
Everyone must remember not to buy Lenovo's products. My family used to have a Lenovo computer, so I smashed it. Many of our Lenovo products are not sold now! Kill this traitor, everyone! Many articles like this let all China people know what shameful things Lenovo has done!
Huawei's 5G standard accounts for one third, and after the exchange with Qualcomm, it needs to pay this part of the patent fee to Qualcomm. Qualcomm Snapdragon chips are sold all over the world, using one-third of Huawei's standard patents, and Huawei's other patents account for half of the world, so Qualcomm needs to pay 50% to 70% of the patent fees to Huawei! ! If Qualcomm doesn't pay, Huawei can charge all mobile phone manufacturers! ! !
Hey. As soon as I saw this article, the whole person became soft. Is it too irritating? Finally, it was destroyed by our own mobile phone. China, we can't fight for breath. Can't you be cruel for once! I'm talking about what you think you look like in the eyes of America. You are just a miscellaneous brand. That's hilarious. This is Qualcomm in the United States. Qualcomm, USA. The purpose of the United States has been achieved, and Ren's family should be fine. The ending together is the perfect ending.
If I am not mistaken, Lenovo has opened the back door. Okay, I'm done. Next, we slowly look at how Lenovo is declining step by step.
I remember that villains or traitors are not profitable. An enterprise that has no bottom line for a long time must not exist.