Northern wolf
That makes sense. Pricing is generally based on asset appraisal (intangible assets and intellectual property appraisal).
Then issue a report.
But I think this is a form, and it does not achieve the purpose of correctly evaluating the patent value.
At present, I think these evaluation agencies are still very amateur.
The evaluation report it made was just a half-procedure to go to the industrial and commercial bureau.
It may cause inconvenience to both parties in the future. (Possibly, it hurts the interests of both parties)
If you really want to make an evaluation (the purpose is to invest in technology, not just to go to the industrial and commercial department for approval), you need to consider at least the following aspects.
1, technology development cost (labor and cost)
2. Technology licensing fee (patent application fee, official service fee)
3. Promotion expenses
4. Analyze the position and market prospect of this technology in this field.
5. What is the service life of this technology? The authority of the utility model is only 10 years, yours is 2006, and there should be X years. How many years can this technology actually be pure in the market?
6. Consider the annual patent fee.
7. Are there a series of patents? With the support of a series of patents, greater benefits can be collected.
8. Is there a technical secret match (if there is a technical secret match, an extra charge is required)
9. Is there any labor service for technical service?
Wait a minute.