Accurate answer:
The following information is all from the Internet. If there is any falsehood, I will not be responsible for it. It is your own discretion. I don’t want to enter the class room. I just sorted out the information on the Internet. It is not me. point of view, so Lenovo doesn't want to get my attention.
Reasons for American imperialism:
First: Lenovo’s computer prices with the same configuration are more than 30 yuan cheaper in the United States than in China. This is what many online netizens say. Bringing back a few Lenovo laptops from the United States will save you money on round-trip travel expenses and even travel expenses. Of course, Lenovo also explained this, saying that it was because of China’s tariff issues and it was directly blaming the government^_^. I won't make any comments, as long as everyone knows it.
Second: 3GPP5G
Voting, this incident completely angered the people in China. Even though I contacted Liu Chuanzhi to come forward to clarify, it was of no avail. Many self-media on the Internet broke the news about the scene at that time. I summarized it Drawn from multiple self-media articles. Lenovo is the only Chinese company to support Qualcomm in the 5G data channel, and the self-media especially emphasizes it! ! Lenovo lobbies other companies to support Qualcomm! ! We are firmly opposed to using the Huawei-Qualcomm method for 5G data channels. The implication is that Lenovo hopes that Qualcomm of the United States will dominate the data channel. In the end, Lenovo lost 2 votes, and Huawei lost 24 to 27, narrowly losing to Qualcomm. If Lenovo gave two articles to Huawei, it would have won 26 to 25 against Qualcomm.
The 5G control channel was given to Huawei because of Huawei's technology that stymied Qualcomm. Lenovo gave it to Huawei this time. This is why Lenovo has always insisted that it voted for Huawei, but never mentioned the matter of voting for Qualcomm for the 5G data channel and even lobbied other countries to vote for Qualcomm. Data channel patents are the most common. Qualcomm took away 70 patents. Someone online analyzed the reasons why Lenovo acquired Motorola. Although it is said that business does not speak out on politics, if a multinational company has problems in key areas and puts its own corporate interests first and national interests second, the company has actually completely changed its character and can even be described as scary. . I don't care how big the backer is behind Lenovo. What I just want to say is to leave it to the Chinese intellectuals to consider. I, a bastard, have no time to speculate on this egg. I remember that Trump in the United States emphasized more than once that those multinational companies in the United States must swear loyalty to the U.S. government. During the 5G voting, all European and American companies in the data channel voted for Qualcomm. No American company voted for Huawei. However, another company in our country said that technology has no borders and gave it to Qualcomm. Trump in the United States also said that technology has borders. This slap was not an ordinary slap.
Third: Lenovo has been uploaded on other websites to engage in samurai activities or donate computers to the US military in order to gain recognition from the Japanese. I think these are harmless. I think the second 3GP voting is really not just a simple voting issue, it reflects the loyalty issue of domestic enterprises. I hope that the top leaders of the central government will take it seriously.
I remember an authoritative financial expert said that multinational companies are often not in their own country due to sales and taxes, so what is considered a domestic company? One criterion is where the company’s headquarters is. The second is whether this company puts national interests first when it comes to major issues. Three: Whether the state can still control it. I hope the country will enact laws as soon as possible. For example, the President of the United States can easily turn domestic and foreign companies into a piece of waste paper with a ban without having to lose money. These domestic entrepreneurs must be allowed to identify with their own country and have a certain deterrent effect, instead of allowing these enterprises to grow bigger, act recklessly, be arrogant, and forget about the redundancy and interests of the motherland.
For entrepreneurs like these, the country should strengthen patriotic education. It is best to conduct patriotic education regularly every year to strengthen it ideologically! This is my only suggestion! ! ! The United States often conducts patriotic education and provides eye drops to multinational companies. It will not interfere with their operations, but requires them to maintain their bottom line.