Russian patent protection

There is a news about Russia these two days. Generally speaking, Russian courts refused to ban the sale of Apple phones nationwide. When it comes to Russia and Apple, many netizens are also busy coming to watch. Some linguistics is not good, and they shout loudly. Russia is a real "macho man". At first glance, there seems to be no problem, but when you look closely, the problem is big.

It's time to test the level of Chinese. Many people's reaction when they first saw this content was that Russia banned the sale of Apple phones, but in fact the title meant that Russia rejected the lawsuit filed to ban the sale of Apple phones. Those netizens who misread the meaning, go back and reflect and learn Chinese well.

Closer to home, the actual situation of this message is that Russia is dissatisfied with Apple, and then filed a lawsuit in the Russian court, hoping to ban the sale of Apple nationwide. However, this request was not recognized by the court, and the Russian court still supported Apple.

The person who brought the lawsuit is a Russian scientist. He is an expert in emergency telephone and has some related patents. Be able to call or text for help in an emergency. The inventor thinks that one of Apple's functions, SOS emergency call, infringes his personal patent right and causes a lot of losses. Therefore, a complaint was filed with the court, asking Russia to ban the sale of Apple mobile phones with this SOS emergency call function.

Speaking of the trial process of this case, it is quite troublesome, because the courts of first instance, arbitration and appeal failed to pass the appeal of scientists. It shows that after the arbitration in the first instance, the scientist still refused to accept the appeal and was rejected. Even the Supreme Court didn't support the scientist in the end.

Sounds a little distressed for this scientist. But we can't doubt that the Russian court is giving Apple a green light. From the perspective of a passerby, we have to believe that this is fair. So we don't need to make a fuss about this matter, but we can think about it. Apple seems to have never been worried, or has never been banned on a large scale. In short, it seems that no country will impose sanctions on Apple. Why?

Take China for example. I won't say much about how miserable Huawei is under US sanctions. Not only in the United States, but also in China, because of the chip. Britain and the United States can punish Huawei unscrupulously because of its technological advantages.

At this time, many people asked. Apple has such a big market in our country. Wouldn't it be hard for the United States if China also sanctioned Apple not to sell in our country? If you really think so, it's too simple. There is a reason why China doesn't sanction Apple.

First of all, global trade has trade agreements. We should at least abide by the rules of the WTO. The reason why the United States sanctioned Huawei is because the United States is shameless and has created a reason for itself, that is, the "security theory." China wants to sanction Apple, and it also wants to create a reason for Apple. But we don't need it, because China is not an American, and the obvious purpose will cause discomfort and rebound in the market. Americans are used to bullying and have strong comprehensive strength, so they can ignore the rules and do whatever they want. However, we have always paid attention to credibility and disdained to do such a thing. Now it is a critical time for development, so we have not smeared a company at will or even sanctioned it like America.

On the other hand, the reason is the actual interest relationship. When we say that the United States sanctions Huawei, it actually has a great loss of interest for itself. However, China's sanctions against Apple will also cause certain losses to China. You know, every time Apple sells a mobile phone in China, it has to pay the corresponding tax. It is said that you can get hundreds of billions by paying taxes on apples every year. At the same time, there are many factories in China, and the existence of these factories has solved the employment problem of our population to some extent. If we really want to ban the sale of apples, it will definitely have a certain impact on our country.

Finally, banning the sale of apples is not in line with our development philosophy. The development of our country is to seek common ground while reserving differences and strive for cooperation. Instead of targeting and sanctioning like the United States before, I don't want to become what I hate most. Therefore, we should maintain our good quality and carry forward China's spirit of fairness and justice, which is the road to sustainable development.

The United States imposed unfair sanctions on Huawei in China, but China did not answer blows with blows, and used the same means to deal with Apple. This comparison, high and low judgment. Our country is taking the route of sustainable development, and we should use science and technology to hit America in the face. Therefore, sanctions against Apple are not that important.