Which institution is better to apply for a patent in the near future?
The conclusion is in the front: don't care about the price, just look for Unitalen. If you care about the price, find a small firm and a partner who is a senior employee of the original patent office or audit association, and the professional direction matches the technical field you apply for. The following reasons are given: First, a large firm like Liu Shenjindu of the Hong Kong Council for the Promotion of International Trade is engaged in foreign-related business and litigation-related business, but the price is too expensive and uneconomical compared with its peers. Unitalen is a rare patent pedigree, and then the development process is a big order from the domestic application business, and the professional categories are relatively complete, and then the total number of people leads to a relatively complete agency process system. When I say complete, I mean not only the application process management ability, but also the business processing and quality inspection ability, and even the unexpected aftermath ability. In fact, there are a number of top 50 research institutes with acceptable quality, but I'm too lazy to give examples one by one. The characteristics of these institutes are not so easy to generalize. There are also a number of original trademark offices that are now rushing into the patent industry. Although marketing is good, they can also spend money to recruit good agents. However, after all, system construction takes time, which may lead to your risk because of the different agents assigned to you. Some are well written and some are not well written. So, if you don't care much about the price, and there are many inventions and applications, and don't consider professional matching, then find Unitalen. Second, if you care about the price, you have to pay some screening fees yourself. There are some small companies with high cost performance in the market. The reason is that those small firms in the start-up stage and development stage are willing to take some high-cost and low-return jobs, because people in these small firms are willing to sacrifice their short-term interests for their development goals. The problem is that it is difficult for you to find these people. If there is no credible introduction channel, only those who care more about evaluation and past experience will do a good job in service quality. From this perspective, the old people who resigned from the patent office and the examination association are more concerned about their own reputation. If something goes wrong, their reputation will stink in the circle, so they care more about the quality of service. This is one of the main reasons why I recommend you to find a small firm. The partner's resume proves that he has the background of patent office and audit association. In addition, people with the background of patent office and trial association are simple, boastful and not good at marketing, and their technical background can be found through the original department. It is rare for you to meet that kind of high-sounding agent, who will ensure that you can write any case as soon as you come up. Finally, judging from the staff size, professional processing capacity and quantity of small firms, it is best for a partner to bring no more than four internship agents, which can basically ensure that this partner has the energy to be responsible for the writing quality of the following agents. You should know this. You don't really think this partner helped you write all the cases. As above, tell me where you want to go 2592 157 198.