Since the iPhoneXR series, the function of fingerprint unlocking has been completely removed from all iphones, which means that the iPhone8 is the last generation of iphones with fingerprint unlocking. As for why Apple is so willful that it directly unlocks and cuts off fingerprints and only supports face unlocking? I think there are several reasons. First, fingerprint unlocking takes up too much space and doesn't conform to the beauty of design.
Now is the era of full screen, and the higher the proportion of front screen, the better, while iPhone has always liked to set fingerprint unlocking on the home button. Now, due to the impact of the trend of full-screen mobile phones, the home button of the iPhone has been cancelled. If the fingerprint is unlocked and set on the back of the iPhone, it will affect the Apple logo on the back of the iPhone, and it will also affect the design of the back of the iPhone. Apple designers will directly unlock the fingerprint and cut it off. Second, Apple's technical confidence
Many domestic mobile phone manufacturers are also supporting both fingerprint unlocking and face unlocking under the trend of popular face unlocking. Few mobile phone manufacturers dare to support face unlocking without fingerprint unlocking directly, because:
However, Apple is confident in face unlocking. Although Apple's face unlocked and overturned at the press conference of releasing the first generation of iPhoneX, Apple has improved the success rate of face unlocked through a large number of data checks by the R&D team, and the rollover rate is lower than that of most Android phones. Moreover, according to my own experience of unlocking the face of the iPhone for several years, I almost never rolled over, which is technical confidence! Third, face unlocking is more convenient than fingerprint unlocking.
This is for iPhone. I believe many iPhone users have already experienced the speed and accuracy of face unlocking. Taking it out of their pockets-automatically brightening the screen-unlocking, the whole process is done in one go, both the unlocking speed and the unlocking accuracy are very fast. In recent years, my experience is that there is no mistake in face unlocking. Otherwise, iPhone users have long vomited and abandoned it. Fourthly, the booking volume of the iPhone12 series proves the acceptance of face unlocking
The booking volume of the iPhone12 series only on the self-operated e-commerce platform in JD.COM is close to 1.5 million, which is enough to show the popularity of the iPhone 12 series. At the same time, it also shows that iPhone users recognize that the iPhone only supports face unlocking, and they don't care whether fingerprint unlocking can assist unlocking.
Recently, the iPhone12 series mobile phones began to be sold, and the phones that Apple began to sell were no longer equipped with headphones and charging heads, which was hotly debated by netizens, while the iPhone responded for environmental protection. I also hope that other mobile phone friends will follow suit. Apple has been leading since Steve Jobs, leading the whole mobile phone industry with technology, and now Apple still has a proud pedigree!
even many people use iPhone to think that they have arrogant and unique capital. Since the launch of the full-screen iPhone, there has been no fingerprint unlocking on the iPhone, and the face ID and password are used to unlock it. After the fingerprint is unlocked on the previous physical button, Apple has never unlocked the fingerprint again, although Android phones have also launched a series of fingerprint unlocking schemes, such as back fingerprint unlocking, side fingerprint unlocking, and off-screen fingerprint unlocking popular among major mobile phone manufacturers!
Off-screen fingerprint unlocking is a very good solution for full screen. However, iPhone does not use back fingerprint unlocking on iPhone, nor does it use off-screen fingerprint unlocking. Now there is no fingerprint unlocking on iPhone12. If iPhone adds fingerprint unlocking at this time, the back is impossible, because the back is too ugly, which Apple does not want to see. If the fingerprint unlocking scheme under the screen is used, it is estimated that many people will say that Apple imitates Android phones, which is contrary to Apple's word-of-mouth value!
Although Apple has learned some aspects of Android's layout in the interface over the years, it has always adhered to its own concept in the appearance of mobile phones. This time, the iPhone12 series has also changed its sleek and fashionable design, adopting the tough cutting design before the iPhone5s, which is also the design style introduced by Jobs since the iPhone4! It is also very popular among fruit fans.
Perhaps Apple hopes to arouse the hearts of many users of old mobile phones by remembering the local design of the iPhone5s, and hopes that the iPhone will return to part of the design, so that many users can easily like the iPhone. This is also a strategy to save Zhao from the siege, but there is no way to see how much progress Apple has made in appearance design, and more of it has its own design language! All the people have said, why else? It's just to save costs! IPhone hopes to save a little cost and lower the price of mobile phones, so as to have better pricing space in the mobile phone market, so as to really PK with Android series mobile phones. I think it is quite reasonable!
why doesn't iphone 12 add fingerprint unlocking? Not only does the iPhone12 have no fingerprint unlocking, but it has been used to unlock the iPhone X since Apple released it in 217. The iPhone 8 series released in the same year was the last one to unlock the phone with fingerprints. After that, the iPhone deleted the "Home" button and the fingerprint unlocking (Touch ID), all of which were based on the Face ID scheme. However, it is reported that the next generation iPhone 13 will re-enter the fingerprint unlocking, and it is still the off-screen fingerprint unlocking method commonly used by Android phones at present. Biometrics
Biometrics, as an advanced means of identity verification, is widely used in many fields such as finance, information security and telecommunications. At present, there are two main mobile phone biometric technologies: fingerprint recognition and face recognition. Since iPhone X was equipped with Face ID, face recognition technology was once considered as the future development direction, and fingerprint payment will be gradually eliminated. Why? Why did Apple cancel fingerprint unlocking and use face recognition to unlock it?
after years of iterative development, at present, the mainstream fingerprint technologies mainly include capacitive fingerprint technology, optical fingerprint technology and ultrasonic fingerprint technology. But before face recognition technology was used in mobile phones, the traditional fingerprint technology was to use capacitive fingerprint technology.
why did apple use face recognition to unlock it? First of all, Face ID is a face recognition technology developed and designed by Apple itself, which is more secure than fingerprint recognition technology. Second, it is more convenient to use the brush face to unlock, and the user only needs to light the screen facing the face to unlock it. Thirdly, Apple conducted differentiated marketing. At that time, smart phones generally used capacitive fingerprints to unlock. If Apple used face-brushing to unlock, there would be more differences compared with other mobile phone brands. For users, face-brushing to unlock sounds will also feel high-tech and cool. IPhone13 is likely to add the off-screen fingerprint unlocking function
With the popularity of the concept of full-screen mobile phones, mainstream Android phones have begun to adopt the off-screen fingerprint unlocking scheme. Off-screen fingerprint identification technology is a technology to unlock fingerprints under the screen glass. Apple is very likely to add the off-screen fingerprint unlocking function to the next generation iPhone 13.
It is reported that Apple has obtained a new patent, which is a new fingerprint identification technology under optical screen. In this year's epidemic situation in COVID-19, there is an obvious shortcoming in face brushing recognition unlocking, that is, users need to take off their masks before they can unlock their faces. This year's iPhone 12 was designed before the COVID-19 epidemic, so this special situation was not taken into account. Therefore, off-screen fingerprint unlocking may appear on the next generation iPhone, and it will be used together with face-brushing unlocking. What uses off-screen fingerprints instead of voltage fingerprints?
At present, most mobile phones are full-screen, and full-screen is also a major trend in the development of mobile phones. Because of the characteristics of capacitive fingerprint unlocking, a button similar to "home" is needed, which will occupy the position at the bottom of the screen, restrict the size of the display screen, and does not conform to the trend of full screen, but the fingerprint mode under the screen does not have this shortcoming, which conforms to the trend of full screen. Conclusion | Technical Ape Little Yellow Map | From the Internet
Why not add fingerprint to unlock? The answer is obvious, because if you add it or not, you should buy it. To put it bluntly, you are used to it.
So many answers can explain the problem. No matter what Apple is like, a group of people will come out to wash the floor, and the earphone charger can be saved. Isn't it reasonable not to add the screen? Or is it true that some people think that not sending chargers is for environmental protection?
facial recognition is really good, but it also has limitations. For example, it is easy to unlock when you wake up unkempt, and you will be paralyzed directly after wearing a mask. Although the off-screen fingerprint is not as easy to use as the face, one more solution can solve the embarrassment when the face strikes, and the off-screen fingerprint is not limited to unlocking, but can also be used as a shortcut to quickly open the wallet or other application functions, which is definitely beneficial and harmless. The only drawback is that Apple has increased the cost.
In a word, no matter what Apple does, fruit powder won't care whether to buy or not, so why should Apple bother to increase costs to cater to consumers?
Apple has always gone its own way. On Android, the scheme of face unlocking and fingerprint unlocking has long been implemented and is very mature. Why does iPhone always miss fingerprint unlocking? Let's analyze it from several breakthrough points. 1. cost factor
once the iphone 12 was released, the behavior of "not distributing chargers" was criticized, which was euphemistically called for environmental protection, but in fact, in the final analysis, it was still a cost issue.
Apple is a company that knows how to "make a living". If it feels that things are unnecessary, it will definitely not take them out. Anyway, it will save money. Regardless of whether users can accept them, they think, "You should adapt to the iPhone, not let the iPhone adapt to you."
The fingerprint unlocking function has already matured, and Apple is absolutely capable of integrating this function under the screen. Unfortunately, the iPhone only supports face unlocking and conventional unlocking methods. Whether it is for environmental protection or saving money, analyze it by yourself. 2. security factor
there are many ways to unlock fingerprints. The "cracker" has long been damaged by people. It used to be bought casually online, but now it seems that it can't be searched, but it's not difficult to buy it. Just like e-cigarettes, if you don't sell it online, can't you buy it? A truth.
to some extent, fingerprint unlocking is not as safe as face unlocking, but it is quite safe to unlock iPhone's face, at least I haven't heard of any problems with iPhone's face.
Apple has always attached great importance to the "security and privacy" of mobile phones, and so has the unlocking method. Although the fingerprint unlocking is mature now, it is not safe in Apple's eyes. Combined with the "cost problem" mentioned above, I am also dubious about Apple's remarks. 3. Brand factor
Apple's mobile phone used to be a model for Android to emulate, but now it has been surpassed in various functions, and it is uncomfortable to let go of pride. Only by differentiating in some places can it highlight its "personality".
First, we gave up the headphone jack, then gave up the fingerprint unlocking, and this time we gave up the charger plug. It can be said that continuous subtraction has advantages and disadvantages, which is beneficial to saving costs and disadvantages for users. But Apple did this because it is Apple, a particularly proud brand.
Some of Apple's actions can be said to be quite willful, but the IOS system, ecology and A-series chips give Apple the qualification to do what Android does not dare to do. After all, from the two important components of mobile phones, they are absolutely different from Android, which is why Apple dares to be so unscrupulous. It is preliminarily predicted that in the future, even the iPhone will not be given the box, and there will be a lot of people to support it, I said. Summary
The reason why iPhone 12 didn't consider users' demands and added fingerprint unlocking is cost, security and brand. Generally speaking, it is spoiled. More than 9% of the profits of global smartphones have been earned by Apple and Samsung. What does this mean? Are they in large quantities? No! They are tough enough, typical businessman thinking, not a compliment.
It's because the fingerprint on the screen will increase the cost of Apple's mobile phone! No one buys it at a good price! It's not embarrassing to say that the technology is immature. It's not too convenient to go out and wear a mask to unlock fingerprints on the screen this year! ! ! Who will take off the mask and sweep the face for a long time! There is also a high probability that Apple's face-sweeping equipment will be broken, and too many of them can't be recognized, and the recognition success rate has dropped after falling over the mobile phone! And it's not cheap to change it!
just look at Android. Unless you don't stick a tempered film. When the adhesive toughened film is attached, the fingerprint on the screen will be useless. It's all the same with or without it. Don't talk about soft film, it's hard to use and it's not useful. PS: What I have now is m3p. I have experienced it personally. Now, I use the edge glue toughened film, and then turn the face upside down. The disadvantage is that the screen will be bright when I wipe the phone. Before using soft film, fingerprints were easy to use, but it was very uncomfortable to use. And once I fell to the ground and smashed the screen directly through the film. (There is also a UV toughened film. It is a fully bonded tempered film, and the film seems to need ultraviolet light irradiation. This doesn't matter, but after the film is broken, it needs ultraviolet light to be removed. It's too much trouble for me to be careless)
Because facial recognition is easier to use
Because I don't want to increase the cost
The fingerprint unlocking technology suitable for full screen is not mature, and the current experience of fingerprint unlocking with reference to Android screen is still not good enough.