The original poster made a serious statement.
If you ask me, saying that Oriental Gardenia copied Miku is simply an insult to my great Miku-don.
In fact, the idea of ??plagiarism was the psychological imbalance of some netizens when Dongfang debuted. Well, this is understandable, right? When a new thing comes out, some people will say this is not good or that is not good. Just like when Miku first appeared in people's field of vision, many people also said it was not good. Undoubtedly, there are many bad things about Oriental Gardenia, but specific issues such as sound sources, systems, and human settings are rational and complex. No one can understand these things in detail, so these people just say "Touhou plagiarized Miku". Everyone can understand plagiarism, right? Just to squirt better.
A spray may feel good for a while, but what you say depends on the consequences. Let’s take a look at Oriental Gardenia’s original character design and compare it with Miku. Wow, can I say it’s ugly?
Another reason is that the sponsor of Oriental Gardenia is Tencent! ! ! ! Link: /view/8483711.htm?fr=aladdin (Introduction - Official Development)
The next step is the comparison between Chinese products and Japanese products. This is what everyone likes to see the most. A representative incident is this link to "Oriental Gardenia Tokatsu Hatsune Miku": /news/201307/97201_9.html
Actually, this was posted by someone for fishing. These are all high-end blackmail, no Do you know why so many people don’t understand that they are all virgins?
After all, what I want to say is that the essence of this issue is not who copied or did not, or who copied who.
The essence of this problem is that Oriental Gardenia is not doing well.
If it is done well and everyone likes it, will anyone criticize it? Will anyone say plagiarism?
Will anyone say that The Romance of the Three Kingdoms plagiarizes the Romance of the Three Kingdoms?
Copy a lot of articles from around the world, let’s see if you can copy them.
Being better than the original is a good copying method.
For someone like Tencent to simply package a concept and then walk away after taking the money, it is simply a misuse of our country’s resources. Because the resource "China's first virtual idol" is gone once it is used. You used it like this for me, do you think you should hit me or not?
Who knows about Oriental Gardenia now? Is Luo Tianyi more popular? Why? Because Luo Tianyi did better. I don’t know why so many people are here to defend these companies that abuse resources, and are they paid?
I know that many patriotic netizens want to complain here. Why do they say that the East is not good? Because it’s just not good. It's not "because you are Chinese, you should say nice things about her". I would like to ask, can the production company of Oriental Gardenia represent China? Can it represent China’s full strength?
If you don’t do well, just admit it honestly and change it. Hatsune wasn’t that good at the beginning. The second character design of Oriental Gardenia is an example. The image has been changed, and some loving fan clubs have made a lot of modifications.
Of course there is no need to complain. The growth of a new thing requires a process. Which child is perfect from birth?
I support our country learning excellent foreign technologies.
I support our country’s technological progress.
I hate that certain forces abuse concepts and take advantage of the pure patriotism of netizens.
Above.