Funding AIDS patients can reduce the source of transmission.
If a person has a relatively infectious disease, it is a very dangerous potential source of infection without treatment. Because these infectious diseases are highly contagious, the state must take compulsory treatment and help these vulnerable groups with a certain amount of money, so as to control the spread of diseases and reduce the viral load.
Although HIV cannot be completely cured at present, it is also very feasible to reduce the infectivity of the disease through the treatment expenses given by the state. The drugs provided by the state to AIDS patients are generally only drugs that can reduce the viral load, but some free drugs will have certain side effects because they are cheaper. But for AIDS patients, it can play a very good role in prolonging life.
The burden on the country is not big, and patients have hope of living.
If you don't take medicine, many AIDS patients will probably disappear in the world, but at the same time, some malicious AIDS patients may deliberately spread the virus to others. If the country is willing to give this medicine to AIDS patients, it will greatly reduce their possibility of becoming a source of infection, and secondly, it will bring hope to other patients by safeguarding the health and life of AIDS patients. At the same time, AIDS patients also pay taxes and social security normally. Results In fact, the drugs given by the state to AIDS patients are less than 100 yuan a month, because most of these drugs have passed the patent period. The cost is relatively low, and part of the cost comes from the international fund. Therefore, the state's investment in this disease is not particularly huge.
In fact, in addition to helping these patients, the state also subsidizes AIDS drugs in order to promote the research results of AIDS more quickly. This disease has greatly affected the health of young people. If the country can control the impact of AIDS without any impact, then in fact, in terms of investment, the cost performance is relatively high.
Free drugs play a bottom role in saving confused patients.
From an economic point of view, although the protection provided by backward and cheap drugs is not perfect, it is acceptable to at least some people in the early stage of infection, and even plays a very important role.
Some AIDS patients may be in a confused period, or even have nothing just left the society. If they can't take free antidepressants, then there may not be those AIDS patients who can choose better treatment programs on their own. In the process of state subsidies, patients will work hard and will not infect others. From the perspective of decision economics, patients will also choose a less extreme way to coexist peacefully with this disease.