Is the disclosure of invention patent the final result of patent examination?

Disclosure of invention patents is the final result of patent examination? The disclosure of invention patent is an important process in the process of patent application, and the process of applying for invention patent is the longest. The invention patent goes through several stages: application, acceptance, preliminary examination, substantive examination and authorization. The disclosure of invention patents is reflected in the preliminary examination of patents. After the initial application is successful, you can directly announce to the whole society that the patent needs protection, and then enter the patent substantive examination stage to see if there is any objection. The disclosure of invention patents is the final result of patent examination. Patent disclosure is a unique procedure of invention patent application, which means that the patent application is made public on this day, but it does not mean that the public can use the patent at will. Open patent is a procedure to examine the application for a patent for invention, and its purpose is to let the public know that someone wants to apply for an open invention. Before publication and authorization, anyone can submit materials to the Patent Office that can prove that the published patent application is not novel or creative. The purpose of this should be to use the power of the public to examine patent applications. After the patent application is published for a period of time, the Patent Office will conduct a formal review of the patent application, such as whether the patent claim is clear, whether the specification is fully disclosed, whether the invention has three characteristics, and whether there is oneness between multiple inventions in the same application. After the application meets the above requirements, the patentee may be authorized not to think that the publication of the invention patent is successful, which is only a prelude to the patent application. What really makes the patentee happy is that the patent has passed the substantive examination, which is the patent. Of course, after the review, some people put forward other meanings, such as patent invalidation; Therefore, from the perspective of long-term intellectual property protection, it is necessary to have a professional person in charge of intellectual property management, such as acting as an agent for intellectual property management through trusteeship.