2. Purchase the original patent and conduct research and development on the basis of the original patent.
3. Introduce high-tech talents (look for high-tech talents with ideas but no funds to realize R&D through headhunting companies)
Comparison of three methods:
The first disadvantage is that it consumes a lot of time and money, and it is not suitable for mass production after easy investment.
The advantage is that the patent is reliable, and the whole research and development can effectively avoid the unnecessary disputes caused by the later patent disputes and large-scale interests.
The second shortcoming is the advantage of the first one, which puts forward higher technical requirements (re-innovation) for our R&D team.
Compared with the first one, the investment time is less and the income is higher. At present, many companies adopt this method for research and development.
The third method is not recommended because the quality of talents is uneven at present. Don't use this method unless you are absolutely sure. This method has the nature of gambling, and if it produces benefits compared with the first two methods, the input-output ratio is very considerable; If it can't produce benefits, it is likely that the investment will be wasted.
Compared with the three methods, it is suggested to use the second method and find talents through the third method. Although gambling is great, you can also find talents who are suitable for this direction (it is most important to know the roots).
If it is a large group, or it is specialized in exporting benefits to R&D, it is suggested to use the first method, which can avoid most of the future troubles.