The subject's question is: "What do you think of Huawei's Qualcomm ranking above 460th and 83rd?"
Qualcomm and Huawei are big companies familiar to netizens. Qualcomm's strength depends on the pursuit of smart phone performance and the patent monopoly of some communication industries.
Huawei's brilliant achievements stem from the accumulation and silent cultivation of technology over the years, which can be seen from Huawei's top 500 rankings over the years.
20 1 1 year, ranking 352nd.
20 12 ranked 35th1.
No.315 in 20 13 years.
20 14, ranking 285th.
20 15, ranking 228th.
20 16, ranking 129.
20 17, ranking 83rd.
From the ranking of Huawei's top 500 companies over the years, we can see that Huawei's achievements are gradually accumulated step by step, and this accumulation is the long-term development of the enterprise.
In terms of business volume, Huawei is also a leader among global enterprises. Not to mention information and communication technology, which is its advantage. In recent years, the mobile phone terminal business is also very popular. HONOR, its sub-brand, kills competitors in the mobile phone market, and its latest mobile phone product, Glory 9, has also achieved a good result of 28 days of millions of sales.
Qualcomm's Opteron processor almost monopolized the processor market of high-end mobile phones. Why use almost?
Because the HiSilicon Kirin developed by Huawei has broken Qualcomm's monopoly on the high-end mobile phone processor market! Have you noticed that Samsung, which supports half of South Korea's national economy, can't abandon the use of Qualcomm Snapdragon even if it develops the mobile phone processor Orion?
So, why is the high-end processor market in Qualcomm? Not only because of Qualcomm's patent monopoly in the field of communication.
The disadvantage of Qualcomm's dependence on patents is also obvious. From the sky-high fine of 6 1 100 million by the China government to the daily fine of 660,000 dollars recently drawn up by the European Union, Qualcomm is beset with lawsuits. This behavior of living on patents has led many extreme netizens to label Qualcomm as a "patent hooligan". No wonder Meizu refused to pay unreasonable patent fees to Qualcomm.
In terms of baseband patents, this is Qualcomm's traditional advantage, and its monopoly has also been broken by Huawei. In the future 5G era, patent standards will no longer be monopolized by Qualcomm. Among them, Huawei's PolarCode scheme has defeated Qualcomm's LDPC scheme and become one of the standards for future 5G.
Revolutionary victory should be reflected in enterprise value, and the world's top 500 companies are just the tip of the iceberg. In the foreseeable future, Huawei will only get farther and farther away from Qualcomm.
First of all, Huawei and Huawei mobile phones are different.
Huawei can't reach the 83rd place only by mobile phone, while Qualcomm is only a manufacturer of communication technology research and development and chip design.
Huawei's advantages lie in its powerful communication technology, base stations, switching, routing and mobile phones. Just as Samsung Electronics is just the tip of the iceberg of Samsung Group, Huawei's mobile phone is only a small part of Huawei.
Huawei's main business is communication, and its mobile phone business depends entirely on blowing and navy. If it's just a mobile phone business, it's estimated that the top five thousand in the world can't get in.
Huawei killed Qualcomm? That's ridiculous. This comparison is extremely unfair and irresponsible. It is a typical self-satisfaction. According to you, Wal-Mart ranks first, killing all companies.
The Fortune Global 500 list has always been the most famous and authoritative list to measure the world's major companies, and is known as the "ultimate list", which is published once a year by Fortune magazine. In the latest Fortune Global 500 list released on July 20th, 2007 from 2065438, Huawei ranked 83rd, far higher than Qualcomm.
First of all, we need to know the criteria for Fortune magazine to select the top 500 companies. In fact, it is very clear to look at the list. The top 500 companies are ranked according to their income. Look at these top companies. How many are there in the oil industry? If you rank Apple by profit, it is estimated to be the first. If you rank Apple by patents, it's a different story. There will be different rankings according to different standards, and different industries will have different rankings at different times.
Let's look at Huawei's revenue structure. 55.7% is operator business, 34.5% is consumer business and 7.8% is enterprise business. These three bgs are Huawei's main businesses.
Qualcomm's income comes from two parts, one is the income from equipment and services, that is, the sales and services of various chips, and the other is the income from patent authorization. Needless to say, Qualcomm is a famous patent hooligan, and what really coincides with Huawei is the chip. According to the ranking of the top ten fabless factories in the world published by IC Insights 2065 438+07, Qualcomm ranks first, Huawei HiSilicon ranks seventh, and Qualcomm's revenue is four times that of HiSilicon.
If Qualcomm can ship five times as much as Hayes.
Qualcomm is obviously superior in all fields. The mid-range business, carrier business and enterprise business are completely out of the business scope of Qualcomm, so this comparison is irresponsible. According to this statement, Wal-Mart and PetroChina really killed Huawei. I don't think you agree with this statement.
The value lies in that only one enterprise in China is truly internationally competitive and can represent China. Huawei is at least 10 Huawei than Japan and at least 30 Huawei than the United States. It takes 15 years to produce a Huawei. How many Huawei can there be in China at present? The core competitive enterprises in Europe, America and Japan are all engaged in technology and technology, and even energy, finance, electricity and telecommunications are engaged in the international market. China is a state-owned enterprise that we have and will only be beaten everywhere abroad to monopolize and collect money, and we also have a lot of real estate. . . China is still far from being a world economic power. . . Seeing the reality clearly and recognizing the reality clearly is the greatest value.
How do you think Huawei lags far behind Foxconn in the world's top 500 rankings?
This shows that Huawei's patent, technology and quality control-R&D is much worse than Foxconn?
No wonder the quality of mobile phones produced by Foxconn is better than that of Huawei!
No wonder Apple Xiaomi is looking for Foxconn instead of Huawei!
Oh, by the way, it is estimated that the retarded navy can't even find Foxconn!
I use Huawei, which is the flash door. I just changed it. Not to brag, to the point, if there is no Huawei, then I will not support domestic production! Nine times out of ten it will be an apple. As the leader of radio communication, Huawei has an unshakable position in the industry. Ericsson, Alcatel-Lucent, Nokia Siemens and Motorola! Huawei has done all this. I'm really proud to have such a private enterprise in China, just like all your relatives are big officials. Can have such a position in the world industry! I want to take Miss Dong's Gree with me.
In addition, Huawei and Qualcomm should not be put together! Is it because of Huawei's Kirin? Obviously, Qualcomm is more professional! You can't even compare with Samsung's processor. Do you think it's okay if the Apple processor is used on Android? Obviously, no! The system is eating the processor, not the other way around. To extend a small topic, there was once a manufacturer whose processor was also famous. It is estimated that everyone has basically forgotten that it is Texas Instruments. I hope Huawei has more R&D of its own! Don't run too hard, this process is essential, after all, the annual research and development expenses are an account!
It is wrong to ask this question. Rice noodles will say that Huawei's mobile phone has nothing to do with Huawei, and they don't want to face the fact that Huawei is powerful. Even if Huawei's mobile phone department is taken out, it is better than the whole Xiaomi, but at least Huawei's mobile phones are also among the top 500, not as good as Huawei's head office's 100. I just want to ask, without the achievements of Huawei's mobile phone business, can the head office enter the former 100? Somebody else's is somebody else's, just because you don't deserve it, you make excuses, right? Huawei lost in the mouth of rice flour, which means that Huawei has gone too far, making one of its own departments as big as others' Xiaomi company. Rice flour can't accept this fact, so they try to lower the status of Huawei's mobile phone, but when they suppressed Huawei with Samsung, they didn't separate Samsung's mobile phone from other Samsung departments, and all the screens and flash memories were with Samsung's mobile phone. If it's not for you, why should Xiaomi allocate funds to the mobile phone department to fuck you? Now people's goal is apple.
This problem is very difficult and naive. The field of communication is much larger than the chip. Huawei ranked first in the world in the field of communication a few years ago, and its mobile phone is also very brilliant. At most, Qualcomm ranks in the top three in the field of chips. Remember that Huawei is a global network service company, not a Huawei mobile phone!
Surpassing is certainly a good thing in China and a proud enterprise, but the comparability between the two is not too great. Huawei does not mainly rely on the chip business. It can be said that Huawei's chip business is only used to serve itself, not the market. Qualcomm is in the market, which limits Qualcomm's model.