Problem description:
Evaluating Qin Shihuang in a slightly concise language ~ ~ requires that the language has charm, not that kind of rigid exposition, and must not be transferred to others ~ ~ If it is good, you can get extra points ~ ~
Analysis:
Qin destroyed the six countries, unified the whole country, caressed the four seas and shook the world. In Xia and Zhou Dynasties, the old ceremony was abolished, and the new law of rejuvenating the country was adopted. Can be the first.
Every time I look at the Three Kingdoms, I see the first sentence at the beginning: "It is said that the general trend of the world will be combined for a long time, and it will be divided for a long time. . . "This is not classic. The quotation here is to prove the greatness of the first emperor.
The achievements of the first emperor are in the future.
As the emperor of the earliest feudal dynasty in the world, every measure taken by Qin Shihuang was historic and creative. For example, the Qin Dynasty established Jiuqing, which was followed by later generations for thousands of years. Although every dynasty and generation has changed, the basic framework has been determined.
This is creation.
-Create history and miracles.
Although there were outstanding emperors in later generations, they reformed the country. But the power of the first emperor lasted for a long time.
Defending Beiguan and fighting against South Guangdong, Qin Shihuang showed the world the strength of the Chinese nation with supreme national strength, and the last time of the second millennium was the Sambo fleet's voyage to the West in the 5th century.
Later generations have slandered the emperor for being cruel and not thinking of the people.
But I don't know, when it comes to belligerence, Liu Che, the emperor of the Han Dynasty, is the best.
Speaking of cruelty, Yang Guang, Emperor Yang Di, is absolutely unwilling to lag behind.
As the first emperor to eat crabs, Ying Zheng has done well enough.
As for thinking of the people,
-Which king really supports the people like his parents,
Politics has never been a toy for most people.
The world is certain and the space is unstable.
The founding emperors of past dynasties really wanted to take iron and blood measures.
Don't wait until the rebels in Enemy at the Gates, the country, that is a drop in the bucket?
Qin Huang was wise to abolish Confucianism and respect the law.
Later generations can't die well, but they are revived.
Suppose, under certain conditions, that one day China or a certain country will unify the earth.
So what should this country do?
Qin Shihuang gave us a good inspiration:
First, develop transportation.
Second, unified measurement.
The Qin Dynasty built dry roads and waterways and spread them to the whole country with Xianyang as the center.
The Qin dynasty abolished the vassal system, strengthened centralization, and there were no more heavy troops stationed at the local level.
In ancient times when communication was underdeveloped, road construction played an irreplaceable role in exterminating bandits and eliminating rebellion.
Even in modern times, high mobility is still the development direction of armies in various countries.
-The reason why the United States can dominate the world militarily is largely related to the extremely high mobility of its army.
Did you notice that when Saddam attacked Iraq, his troops were disarmed in an instant?
As for the sporadic resistance of Iraqi guerrillas, is there any hope for even the people who lack resistance? )
Speaking of unified measurement:
Since the establishment of the Bretton Woods system after World War II, the world began to use the US dollar as the designated reference standard. It was not until the later economic crisis that Asia and Europe re-emerged that the dollar began to decline.
America in the forties and fifties was a copy of the Qin Dynasty.
The most powerful country, the most violent organ, and the most powerful state machine. . .
The middle of last century would not have been a nightmare for the whole world if the cultural differences between different ethnic groups were not too great, and the Americans who flaunted freedom were under the banner of non-interference with other ethnic groups, and if the history was pitiful and there was no particularly long and splendid civilization.
Qin Huang's contribution, although not unprecedented, is absolutely unprecedented, even compared with aliens:)
Some people say that he is a tyrant, but I can't fully agree with him. Although Comrade Zheng Gang's work attitude is worth discussing, his specific atrocities are still unfounded, which is mainly based on rumors. Who can tell his cruelty?
What? It wastes people and money to build the Great Wall in Wan Li, which is proved by the legend that Meng Jiangnu cried the Great Wall through the ages? And the cruel historical fact that he burned books to bury Confucianism? What about the fact that he built the mausoleum and Epang Palace?
Okay, that's it? These facts exist, we can't deny it, but I want to say a word for Comrade Zheng Gang: He didn't do anything completely wrong in these matters. Don't believe it? Let's analyze these facts and see if he has done anything wrong.
First of all, this comrade wasted money to build the Great Wall of Wan Li. I don't think it is his fault. On the contrary, it should be a great achievement for him. This is not to speak for him, nor because the Great Wall he built is still the pride of our motherland today, but because it is indeed the case. As we all know, when Qin Shihuang unified the six countries, Xiongnu, a nomadic people in the north, was always a worry to the people in the Central Plains of China. They burned, robbed and raped, cruel and stubborn. Comrade Zheng Gang guaranteed the life safety of the people in the Central Plains, and ensured that there would be as few wars as possible. Organizing the construction of this active fortification to avoid war as much as possible is related to the great cause of national defense construction in the Millennium. Its practice is desirable and its spirit is commendable! What? What does this comrade mean by forcibly recruiting civilian workers? So many people broke up, and there was a tragic story of Meng Jiangnv crying at the Great Wall. Here, I want to talk about it. Think about the situation at that time: the six countries were unified at the beginning, but the people's hearts were not completely unified. Is it possible to seek the cognitive unity of hundreds of millions of people in the country at that time? Besides, the people's ideological consciousness at that time was not as high as it is now! It is absolutely impossible to call on the people to volunteer to participate in national defense projects as they are now calling for the war to resist US aggression and aid Korea! In addition, it is uncertain whether Comrade Zheng Gang was a forced civilian worker at that time. Maybe he meant well, but his officials misunderstood him. Also, Comrade Zheng Gang himself advocated the rule of law, which was originally a tough measure. He realized that as long as the national defense goal was achieved, all legal means were desirable. Here, I especially want to criticize Comrade Meng Jiangnv. As a member of the people, it should be glorious for her husband to sacrifice for national defense! Complain again, and the 800-mile Great Wall won't cry. You know, the 800-mile Great Wall is the crystallization of many people's blood and sweat! Moreover, your situation, I believe, was not in the majority at that time. Many people in this country can tolerate it. Why are you crying? Hum, don't cry foul, of course, I also know that you are sad about your husband's death, which is understandable! But you have to think about it. People can't be resurrected after death. Can you Meng Jiangnv take it out on the Great Wall that your husband worked so hard to build?
Ok, let's talk about Comrade Zheng Gang's second question, about his cruel and merciless accusation of burning books and burying Confucianism. This point, although recorded in history, is still the same sentence: concrete analysis of specific things. As is known to all, Qin Shihuang completed the first unification in the history of China. Comrades, in the barbaric era at that time, reunification was not a simple matter! Not only should the country be unified, but more importantly, the ideology should be unified. You know how difficult it is. We must correct a few remarks and scholars who hinder the unification of ideas. As I said, this comrade advocates the rule of law, which means ruling the country according to law. Therefore, it is understandable for the comrade to take extremely decisive measures against these remarks that are not conducive to national reunification and a few lawless scholars! Besides, we don't know whether there was an education policy for these people at that time, or whether they repeatedly angered Comrade Zheng Gang. As a monarch in the great cause of complete reunification, he must have extreme personality, powerful means and extraordinary courage, and don't be afraid of being discredited by future generations. This comrade has done a good job, and there should be no more controversy.
Finally, the last question raised by Comrade Zheng Gang is that he built the Mausoleum and Epang Palace, which is an indisputable fact. To be honest, I don't agree with this either, but I don't have too many reasons to object, but one thing is worth affirming: it's not worth emulating! Why don't you agree? As we all know, we can't seek personal gain from public interests, nor can we seek personal gain from national wealth. Why aren't there too many reasons to object? This should be put in the circumstances at that time: it was a feudal society. "The world is big, is it the land of kings?" Is leading the land king? "Under this idea, this comrade, as an unprecedented monarch, built an extraordinary mausoleum and a luxurious villa for himself. What's there to say? Although the tombs and villas are a little big, they are still suitable for their identity! Have you noticed? It is said that a small village official built himself a tomb no less than a grave. This happened in a society that advocated cremation and severely punished corruption. What can we say to Comrade Zheng Gang? Here, I want to criticize people again, and I criticize people very severely. Who do you want me to criticize? Ha, can't guess? I want to talk about Xiang Yu, the overlord of Chu, who burned the Epang Palace in 800 miles with a fire. Don't you know that the construction of Comrade Zheng Gang is not easy? If you don't like it, you shouldn't destroy it with fire. We should also advocate utilitarianism! This comrade is still a noble family, and he has no vision or dignity at all. He should be severely criticized! I think the handling of Epang Palace should be handled properly if it is handed over to Comrade Liu Bang. He should keep this hard-won cultural heritage wisely. However, the situation at that time did not allow him to deal with these things, so I won't say it here. Okay, digression, but it's over.
Finally, to sum up Comrade Zheng Gang of Qin Shihuang: On the whole, this comrade is good, and his contribution definitely outweighs his mistakes. If the merits and demerits are counted separately, it should be at least 82 points, that is, eight points must be kept.
All right, that's it. Do you have any comments on Comrade Zheng Gang? Please raise your hand if you have any questions, and welcome different opinions to participate in the discussion!