1. Do you distinguish these products?
Regarding the Samsung GALAXY Tab tablet and Apple's iPad, when Apple's lawyers asked them to distinguish the two on the spot, Samsung's lawyers couldn't tell the difference at first.
"Apple lawyers have produced a lot of evidence, and a large number of online shoppers mistakenly buy Samsung products as Apple products."
2. Unless you take drugs
After Judge Gao received a 75-page briefing from Apple asking the court to allow Apple to summon 22 witnesses to testify in court, Judge Gao was forced to ask Apple's lawyers if they were taking drugs.
Judge Gao: Unless you take drugs, you should know that we will never let these witnesses appear in court!
Li Hao, lawyer of Apple: Your Honor: First of all, I want to make it clear that I have never taken drugs, and I can assure you of that.
Without us, none of the iPhone can be sold.
Samsung executives accused Apple, "It was 20 years after Samsung began to develop mobile phone technology that Apple's first iPhone went on the market. If you don't use Samsung's patented technology, Apple can't even sell an iPhone. "
Step 4 navel
Samsung lawyer: I wonder if you have heard that some children say that the Home button of iPhone looks like a belly button?
Phil schiller, Vice President of Apple: There is no such thing!
Don't say these products.
Samsung said: Galaxy Nexus has a small sales volume and is not suitable for reference … ..
6.iPhone design is very general
As early as the beginning of this lawsuit, Samsung lawyers have complained to the judge: the design of iPhone is the general trend, and there is nothing special.
Itay Sherman, another expert who was brought to court by Samsung, once again expressed the same view: the designs of iPhone and iPad are very "obvious" and should not be protected by law.
7.a bowl of water
Senior Samsung designers testified in court that they had applied for the design patent of F700 from June 5438 to February 2006, earlier than the earliest release of Apple iPhone. More importantly, the designer said that this device was inspired by a bowl of water, not an Apple patent.
8. admit defeat in advance
Michael Wagner, a Samsung witness, said: Apple made a serious mistake in calculating the loss of profits. In fact, Samsung's profits from products that are suspected of copying iPhone and iPad designs or infringing other Apple patents are only $520 million, far less than the more than $2 billion calculated by Apple.
9. You must live.
Before reading 109, Gao told all the jurors: The following people should stand up every once in a while, and I want to make sure that you are still alive. In addition, cheer up, I ask you to read every one of these materials carefully, including me!