What are the benefits of utility model patents? Advantages and disadvantages compared with invention patents

What are the benefits of utility model patents? Advantages and disadvantages compared with invention patents Statistics on weaknesses of utility model patents Like invention patents, utility model patents are a kind of patents, but often everyone is familiar with invention patents. So what are the benefits of utility model patents? What are the advantages and disadvantages compared with invention patents? What are the benefits of utility model patents? Advantages and disadvantages compared with invention patents What are the advantages of utility model patents? Compared with the invention patent 1, the utility model can be authorized more quickly. Inventions usually take 1.5-3.5 years to get authorization, while utility models usually take 6- 10 months to get authorization, which has obvious advantages. 2. The utility model application fee and annual fee are more favorable. The official cost of the invention application stage is 3450 yuan, while the utility model only needs 500 yuan; As far as the annual fee after authorization is concerned, the utility model is also lower than the invention. 3. Because the utility model does not need to go through the substantive examination procedure, it is easier to obtain authorization. Although the newly revised Guide to Patent Examination requires examining its novelty, it still fails to examine its creativity, so it is easier for a utility model to be authorized, provided that the project meets other requirements for the authorization of utility models. Where an invention and a utility model are applied for the same project at the same time, the utility model shall be authorized first, and the invention may be rejected due to lack of creativity; However, this does not mean that the authorized utility model can also be declared invalid. See the analysis below for details. 4. The patent right of utility model is more stable and not easy to be declared invalid. The conventional view is that the patent right of utility model is unstable, because it is easily declared invalid without going through the substantive examination procedure and directly authorized through formal examination and simple novelty examination. The instability of the utility model is actually only aimed at those projects that are not novel and creative. Such a project should not be authorized from the beginning, similar to the junk patent that people often say, and it is easy to be declared invalid. However, if a project does have its innovation, then the utility model will be more stable. This is because in the process of invalidation, inventions and utility models are different in creative judgment criteria: first, the field of existing technology is narrowly limited to utility models, and generally does not extend to similar or related fields; Secondly, the number of existing technologies. For inventions, many existing technologies can be cited, but for utility models, they are limited to one or two items. Generally, many existing technologies are not cited to evaluate their creativity. In other words, if a project applies for an invention, it is more likely to be invalid after authorization, because the cited documents are wider and more numerous; If the application is a utility model, the scope of the comparison document is narrow and the number is small, and the possibility of being declared invalid after authorization is even smaller. On the other hand, when the same project applies for invention and utility model at the same time, the invention application can be rejected by citing three or four comparative documents; For an authorized utility model, it can't be declared invalid because it can't usually quote three or four comparison documents. Here also embodies the more stable characteristics of the utility model.