In the Han Dynasty, the South County and Nanyang County were bounded by the Han River (the folk historians in Xiangyang in the Eastern Jin Dynasty learned to pick their teeth: "South County is from the south of the Han Dynasty and Nanyang County is from the north of the Han Dynasty", which can be confirmed by ancient books and documents). Wollongong is located 70 miles outside the west gate of Wancheng, the county seat of Wanxian County. Wollongong is called Nanyang Zhuge Lu (Tang and Liu Yuxi).
Wollongong in Nanyang was called Longzhong in history. Ye Ming Zhang Gui's Collection of Wuhou: "Jiajing in the dead of winter, I was ordered to visit Nanyang, Tang Dou and worship Wuhou Temple in Wolonggang in my spare time. The hills in the southwest of the county can be ten miles, with bamboo forests rustling and dense ancient trees. The terrain in the front four sides of Yingsi Temple is slightly lower, but the hills are uplifted, so it is called Longzhong, covering Nanyang. " The predecessor of Xiangyang Gulong Middle School is the commemorative garden landscape "Ten Scenes in Longzhong" built in the Kangxi period of Qing Dynasty. 1893 (Guangxu period of Qing Dynasty) was renamed as "Gulongzhong" and a stone archway with the same name was built.
Nanyang County governs the area north of Hanshui River in Xiangyang City. Now Xiangyang Gulong Middle School is located in the south bank of Hanshui River, and the Han Dynasty belongs to the south county, which obviously has nothing to do with Zhuge Liang's "cutting Nanyang". The first edition of Atlas of Historical Geography of China. The Eastern Han Dynasty edited by Mr. Tan Qixiang strictly followed this historical fact. However, in his later years, Mr. Tan stood on the side of Xiangyang Longzhong and verbally overturned this demarcation. At the invitation of Xiangyang, he wrote an inscription to the effect that Dudahan Water Management Middle School was located in Dengxian County, Nanyang in the Eastern Han Dynasty, so "farming Nanyang" was really unclear in Xiangyang Longzhong.
Why are there long-standing disputes, and one of them is almost false?
For example, at some time in the last century, Koreans organized a "Xianshan World Heritage Application" to package the place names and landmarks in Xiangyang, Hubei Province, such as Xianshan, Lumen Temple, overseas Chinese in Taiping, Daughter City and Monument to Tears (even Li Bai's "Xiangyang Song" was once sung as one of the Korean national quintessence "Twelve Songs of the Li Dynasty"). Why is this happening? Because there is a Xiangyang County in gangwon, South Korea, which is said to be the breeding ground for the descendants of Xiangyang Voucher Army in the Southern Song Dynasty, these overseas Chinese have kept the place names and landmarks of Xiangyang, China, the hometown of Xiangyang Voucher Army, in South Korea for hundreds of years and become a part of local history. It's like a family secret recipe changed its name and became famous after applying for a patent. The original creator can only sigh.
The controversy over farming is similar to this. Zhuge Liang told himself that he had been ploughing in Nanyang. Almost 170 years later, Zhuge Liang's iron powder and Xiangyang people in the Eastern Jin Dynasty learned to gnash their teeth. While acknowledging that Nanjun County and Nanyang County are bounded by the Hanshui River, it is suddenly said that Zhuge Liang's home is in Dengxian County, Nanyang (north bank of Hanshui River), and it is twenty miles west of Xiangyang City (south bank of Hanshui River), which is called Longzhong, which is obviously contradictory. A phantom. However, it is such a "Longzhong" that has become the main card of Xiangyang narrators in later generations. After years of processing and deduction, Longzhong, 20 miles west of Xiangyang City, officially settled in its current site (Gulong Middle), which was transformed from "Liangjia was in Dengxian County, Nanyang" to "plowing in Nanyang", so the dispute over cultivated land occurred in Ming and Qing Dynasties.
Fortunately, Gu Longzhong, who is known as the first scene in Xiangyang, Hubei Province, was born in a large class, but he didn't come. He was cloned in Xiangyang County, South Korea, otherwise there would be another "Korean theory" in the dispute over cultivated land.
Personally, I guess, at least until the end of the Southern Song Dynasty, there was no real scene called Longzhong in Xiangyang. At that time, the voucher army had no memory of Longzhong, and overseas Chinese could not be resettled. Yuan Haowen, a scholar and poet at the end of the Song Dynasty and the beginning of the Yuan Dynasty, wrote "Nostalgia for Fengshan", lamenting that "Yanjing cherishes good luck and Wolong rises in the dragon". The "dragon" in the poem obviously refers to Wollongong in Nanyang.
Xiangyang, China and Xiangyang County, South Korea, although the original versions, like overseas Chinese, bear some of the same historical memories and proud cultural values, so do Wollongong in Nanyang and Gulong in Xiangyang.
The title master and disciples endorsed Gulongzhong with the so-called "final conclusion" and branded it with the words "legal documents", trying to make banners as a cover to block the crowd. This is "Xiangyang". Suggest writing something well-founded and insightful. Wouldn't it be quick for everyone to collide?
The column "Learning Power" 20 19 10 2 "Daily Cultural Map" of the Propaganda Department of the Communist Party of China introduces Nanyang City, Henan Province, and calls Nanyang "the land where Zhuge Liang, the Prime Minister of Shu and Han Dynasties, plowed the fields"-Ask a question: Is this the most authoritative conclusion in the country?