Is there any requirement for IELTS score in csc application?
Details of csc Conditional Audit \x0d\ Scoring Rules for Scoring Items \x0d\ 1. The comprehensive quality of the applicant. Including the applicant's professional foundation, academic performance, scientific research interest, experience and ability, comprehensive performance, international communication ability (including foreign language level), development potential, etc. \x0d\ Weight: 20% 8- 10. ① Excellent academic performance, solid professional foundation \x0d\ ② Strong interest in scientific research, rich experience in scientific research, and participation in major international scientific research cooperation projects, major national projects, major key research projects (special projects), state key laboratories, key research bases of humanities and social sciences of the Ministry of Education, and national projects (technologies) \x0d\ ④ Outstanding performance in all aspects, high comprehensive quality, great development potential \ x0d \ ④ Excellent foreign language proficiency; Have foreign exchange experience \x0d\ 5-7 points ① Good grades and good professional foundation; \x0d\ ② Have certain interest in scientific research, have certain experience in scientific research, have participated in international scientific research cooperation projects or general scientific research projects in this field \x0d\ ③ Have certain research ability, have participated in international academic conferences \x0d\ ④ Have high comprehensive quality, have certain development potential \x0d\ ⑤ Good foreign language level; Have certain international communication skills \x0d\ 1-4. ① Average academic performance, weak professional foundation \x0d\ ② No scientific research experience, weak scientific research ability \x0d\ ③ General quality, little development potential \x0d\ ④ Poor international communication ability and poor foreign language proficiency \x0d\2. The research level of the study destination country and the study unit in the selected disciplines and professional fields \x0d\ Weight: 20% 8- 10 Score ① The research level of the study destination country is in the leading position in the world, and the study units are world-class universities and authoritative institutions. Or the research level in the field of studying abroad is very high \x0d\ ② The research conditions are good \x0d\ 5-7 points ① The research level is somewhat different from that in China, and the research level of the units studying abroad is relatively advanced in China \x0d\ ② The research conditions are good \x0d\ 1-4 points ① The research level is similar to or worse than that in China. \x0d\ ② Limited scientific research conditions. \x0d\ ③ Overseas institutions with bad records \x0d\3. Foreign tutor \x0d\ Weight: 20% 8- 10 Score ① Foreign cooperative scholar or tutor is a world-renowned professor or authority in this field and has strong academic influence \x0d\ ② Rich experience in scientific research/teaching, active in the frontier field of this subject all the year round, with strong scientific research strength. In recent years, there have been high-level articles published or scientific research achievements exported (determined according to the professional field) \x0d\ ③ Close contact with the applicant's domestic tutors and units, and the research topics are the same, and the cooperative research project \x0d\ ④ The foreign tutor's major is highly related to the applicant's domestic major \x0d\ 5-7 points \ ① The foreign cooperative scholar or tutor's level is good \x0d\ ② He has certain scientific research/teaching ability, and is engaged in scientific research in this field. There are high-level articles and achievements in recent years (determined by the professional field) \x0d\ ③ There is a certain connection with the applicant's domestic tutors and units, and there is no experience in cooperative research on topics or projects \x0d\ ④ The foreign tutor's major is highly related to the applicant's domestic major \x0d\ 1-4: ① The level of foreign tutors is the same as or worse than that of domestic tutors x0d \ ② Teaching. There are no articles or achievements in recent years (determined by professional field) \x0d\ ③ The research direction of foreign tutors has nothing to do with the applicant's domestic major (research direction) \x0d\ ④ There is not enough time and energy to guide students, such as being older or enrolling too many students in that year. \x0d\4。 The major of studying abroad \ x0d \ weight:15% 8-10 \ ① belongs to national major projects, major projects, cross/blank disciplines or key technologies urgently needed by the country, and frontier disciplines with national key development \x0d\ ② has not been developed or just started in China. There is a big gap between its development level and the international level \x0d\ ③ The major (research direction) to be studied abroad is closely related to the major studied in China \x0d\ 5-7 points ① It belongs to provincial and ministerial projects and topics; There is an urgent need for cross/blank disciplines and frontier disciplines at the provincial, ministerial or university level \x0d\ ② There is a big gap between the domestic development level and the international development level \x0d\ ③ There is a certain convergence between the major of studying abroad and the major of studying abroad \x0d\ 1-4 points \x0d\ ② There is no need to study abroad; The applicant has no relevant professional background \x0d\5. Necessity of studying abroad and feasibility of studying abroad plan \ x0d \ weight:15% 8-10 points ① The applicant's major and current research direction are closely related to the major (research direction) of studying abroad, and the goal of studying abroad is very clear \x0d\ ② The applicant or his unit/tutor is very familiar with the countries, institutions and partners to be visited and has established a long-term relationship. X0d \ ③ The training plan jointly formulated by domestic and foreign tutors is concrete and feasible \x0d\ 5-7 points ① The applicant's major and current work are closely related to the major (research direction) of studying abroad \x0d\ ② The applicant has a deep understanding of the countries, institutions and collaborators to be visited but has no cooperative relationship \x0d\ ③ The study abroad goal is clear and the plan is basically feasible \ X0d1-4 ① The applicant's major and current work are quite different from the major (research direction) of studying abroad X0d ② The applicant doesn't know about the countries, universities and partners planning to go to X0d ③ The goal of studying abroad is unclear, and it is difficult to complete X0d 66. The recommendation attitude of the applicant's unit and the evaluation of the selection unit on the applicant in the school evaluation stage \x0d\ Weight: 10% 8- 10 score ① The overall evaluation of the applicant by the school experts is high \x0d\ ② The overall evaluation of the selection unit on the applicant's ideological and moral character, study and scientific research is excellent, and it is actively recommended \ x0d \ 5. X0d\ ② Generally recommended by the selection unit, basically in line with other inspection standards of the selection unit for the applicant \x0d\ 1-4: ① The overall evaluation of the applicant by the experts in the school is generally \x0d\ ② The recommendation attitude of the selection unit is not positive or not recommended, which does not meet the inspection standards of the selection unit for the applicant.