Huawei is a company and the United States is a country.
Domestic enterprises involved in 5G mainly include Huawei, ZTE and Datang Telecom.
Qualcomm, Cisco and Intel are the major companies in the United States participating in 5G.
Huawei and Qualcomm compete for the global 5G standard
There are three scenarios in the 5G standard * * *: eMBB, mMTC and URLLC!
Huawei won one-third of the standard-setting rights in eMBB scenario voting, while Qualcomm won two-thirds. Huawei could have won two-thirds of the standard-setting rights. Without Lenovo and its subsidiary Motorola, Huawei won the vote in Qualcomm by one vote. However, in order to get the right to launch Qualcomm chips, Lenovo took Motorola to vote for Qualcomm, which made Huawei lose to Qualcomm by one vote. That one-third of the decision-making power is that Lenovo voted for Huawei when Huawei is significantly ahead of Qualcomm, which can be said to be accommodating and irrelevant. However, Qualcomm still gives Xiaomi the right to launch Snapdragon chips, not Lenovo. Therefore, China brand mobile phones will give Qualcomm patent fees every year. The relationship between Huawei and Qualcomm is mutual patent licensing, and Qualcomm does not produce mobile phones, so Qualcomm gives Huawei very little patent fee.
The other two scenes did not start voting.
On the 5G core patent,
All enterprises have contributed their own patents and adopted them. Huawei contributed 17% of the patented technology to 5G technology. At present, it is the enterprise that contributes the most patents. Among them, Huawei, ZTE, Cisco, Ericsson, Qualcomm, Samsung and Datang Telecom are all core patent contributors of 5G technology.
The United States suppressed Huawei and ZTE.
On the one hand, the United States wants to protect the interests of its own enterprises (mainly Qualcomm and Cisco). Second, the prism project in the United States needs to use the back door of American company equipment and chips to send user information back to the United States for information analysis. Huawei chip inSE security protection module prevented the US from asking for information.
Due to the economy and the prism plan of the United States, the current suppression of Huawei by the United States has become the focus. Compared with ZTE, Huawei is stronger and more difficult to deal with.
To sum up, if we only talk about 5G technology, a company is better than a country, of course it is a country. The author has no exact information about the comparison between companies. However, the overall revenue of Huawei is much higher than that of Qualcomm and Cisco.
5G (fifth generation) technology refers to the fifth generation communication technology. The whole world uses a 5G technology, the United States and China are the same, and there is no essential difference. However, the pattern of countries mastering 5G technology is changing. Before 5G technology, 4G and 3G were dominated by western enterprises, including Cisco and Qualcomm in the United States, Ericsson and Nokia in Europe. Enterprises in China have always been weak in communication technology and have no right to speak internationally.
In 5G, a Huawei suddenly appeared in China. Huawei is in a leading position in 5G technology and holds a large number of patents. Recently, Ren Zheng Fei said in an exclusive interview with the BBC that he is confident that "the world will not leave us because we (5G communication technology) are more advanced."
The 5G technology in the United States is also relatively advanced, but it is not as dominant as the 3G and 4G eras. On April 9, 2065438, CTIA released a report, which clearly pointed out the development status of 5G technology in various countries, among which the United States not only lags behind China, but also lags behind South Korea (mainly Samsung) in 5G technology, ranking only third.
If you think this report is inaccurate, you can look at Huawei's orders on 5 G. Globally, Huawei's 5 G orders have reached 32 orders, far ahead of competitors. This is still an achievement made under the containment of the United States. If there were no obstacles from the United States, the number of orders would definitely be more.
Huawei's 5G equipment has entered the era of "blades". On 20 1918, 19, Huawei's "Development and Large-scale Application of Next Generation Blade Base Station Solution" won the first prize of National Science and Technology Progress in 20 18. Huawei's blade 5G equipment, including blade 5G Microwave, blade 5G AAU and blade 5G Base Station, allows customers to build 5G facilities like building blocks. This also marks that Huawei's 5G equipment has fully entered the "blade" era.
"The West is not bright, and the United States cannot represent the whole world." In an exclusive interview with BBC, Ren, the founder of Huawei, responded to the US containment of Huawei. "The United States only represents a part of the world. Even if the United States exerts pressure, it will not destroy Huawei. It will only allow Huawei to upgrade its products and services. " He said.
Ren Zheng Fei said frankly: "There are very few countries in the world that can do 5G, and Huawei is the only one in the world that can combine 5G with the most advanced microwave technology." Therefore, Ren thinks this is our advantage. If only some members of these countries disagree, then we can negotiate. If it rises to the national level, we won't sell them.
As far as 5G network technology is concerned, the United States is definitely not as good as Huawei.
By the end of 18, Huawei had 1970 5G patents, while Qualcomm only had 1 146 patents. In terms of quantity, Huawei has great advantages. But if you count the core patents of 5G network, Huawei is still much less than Qualcomm. After all, Qualcomm has been leading in technology since the 2G era, and has more experience in construction than Huawei.
Thankfully, Huawei recently completed the Indian test of 5G network in Italy, with the highest network speed of 2.7G per second and network delay of 1 ms ... several people are happy and worried. Recently, American telecom operator AT & amp； T's 5G network test seems to be unsatisfactory. The highest speed is only 24.36Mb/s, and the network delay is as high as 77 ms In this way, Huawei's 5G network is several times ahead of the United States.
I don't know what you think of Huawei 5G? Please leave a comment below to let more people see your opinion. Thank you!
Huawei in China, Qualcomm in the United States and Ericsson in the European Union are actually the same technology, and they all participated in the formulation of the 5G standard. However, at this stage, the emphasis and progress on 5G are different, and Huawei has a slight advantage (except for the basic communication patent Qualcomm, Huawei has advantages in 5G patents and 5G base stations, and there is not much difference between 5G baseband and mobile phone processors). Next, it depends on how their business is progressing.
A company sounds unfair compared with a country's 5 G technology, but in fact, the United States is not as good as Huawei in 5 G.
Let's take 5G communication equipment as an example. The world's four largest communication equipment manufacturers are Huawei, Ericsson, Nokia and ZTE, two in China, two in Europe and none in the United States.
Qualcomm in the United States is quite strong in 3G, but in 4G, China and the European Union began to unite to deal with it. With the arrival of 5G, Qualcomm's position in the field of communication has further declined. Although Qualcomm can continue to collect patent fees in the 5G era (because 5G mobile phones should also be compatible with 4G/3G/2G), Qualcomm's patents will expire sooner or later, and Qualcomm has long lost its former glory in 5G communication technology.
Although Huawei is only a company, it is indeed the first in the world in 5G technology. But at the same time, we should not underestimate it. Although the United States has no advantage in 5G, it is still ahead of us in the fields of chips, operating systems, military and high-end manufacturing.
Don't be conceited and don't sell yourself short. This is our objective attitude towards the development of China.
Who is better in their respective 5G technologies, Qualcomm or Huawei?
Having said that, we should actually talk about the issue of 5G voting, because Huawei and Qualcomm have tried their best to compete for the dominant position in the formulation of standards for 5G networks. As far as industry standards are concerned, everyone wants to fight. After all, if the standard is set by ourselves, then our technology is naturally the most advantageous, but it is still a pity that we lost to Qualcomm by one vote.
However, in the battle for 5G, Qualcomm accepted the formulation of long code and short code, and Huawei won the standard of control code by its own strength. Although it seems that Huawei is losing money, on the whole, Huawei has a relative advantage because of its communication business.
The difference between the two
Unlike Qualcomm, Huawei has not only mobile phone business, but also self-developed processor and communication business. More importantly, Huawei is also a patented technology export-oriented enterprise. In this case, Huawei naturally has the right to grant patents. It is reported that up to now, Huawei has 74,307 independent patents, and the number of applications is increasing at a rate of 1300 every year. This alone is enough to "crush" many large technology companies. Even well-known brands such as Apple and Samsung pay hundreds of millions of dollars in patent licensing fees to Huawei every year, which really makes our own brands proud!
Of course, in the previous era of 2G, 3G and 4G networks, Qualcomm of the United States mastered a large number of necessary patents of industry standards, occupying an absolute dominant position in the industry. However, in the 5G era, China technology came from behind, which is inseparable from Huawei's efforts. Ren Zhengfei, president of Huawei, once said: "Qualcomm's patent fee is as high as 5%, which is equivalent to letting all mobile phone manufacturers work for it!" According to the shipment of China's own brand mobile phones last year, Qualcomm got about $2.6-3 billion in patent fees from China manufacturers! Therefore, in order not to be controlled by others, Huawei's investment in technology research and development can be described as "regardless of cost", with a huge capital investment of nearly 90 billion yuan per year; In addition, Huawei has invested more in technology research and development in the field of 5G than Qualcomm. In any industry, whoever sets standards will have the opportunity to master the right to speak and stand at the top of the global industrial chain. In the end, Huawei's efforts paid off, and its 6 1 5G standard patents accounted for 22.93% of the world, ranking first in the world! Really let China's patented technology master the right to speak in the world.
abstract
Although it is mentioned in the above description that Qualcomm has many patents in the 2G/3G/4G era, Huawei also has many patents in 5G, so there is not much difference between them. In addition, the cross patent between Huawei and Qualcomm is now the Internet of Everything. At present, Huawei has 23 orders for 5G, which is a boom.
In fact, there is another enterprise in China, namely Shinco Group, which was established in Wuhan in July this year. Up to now, it has 38,000 employees, and the estimated annual income can reach 60 billion. Most importantly, Shinco Group is a state-owned enterprise, and there will be no shortage of funds and talents. The registered capital is 30 billion. It can be said that it is backed by the state and Wuhan talents. No wonder it can achieve something once it is established in 5 G.
So generally speaking, although Huawei is currently the number one supplier of communication equipment in the world, although it has great advantages compared with other brands such as Nokia and Ericsson, compared with national enterprises such as Cisco, its advantages are actually not great, so the follow-up depends on the development of several companies.
Huawei's 5G technology is world-class, which is comparable to that of the United States. The incident and the lobbying and containment of President Fu and the Secretary of State around the world have become strong evidence that Huawei's 5G technology has completely surpassed the United States and has been admitted by the US government in disguise. Meng Wanzhou incident, ZTE incident, and lobbying by the US President and Secretary of State to contain Huawei will all become classic cases and be included in the courses of world-renowned universities. The first-class gold-lettered signboard in American science and technology could have been used to bluff for 20 or 20 years. The Trump administration did the stupid thing of shooting itself in the foot. This signboard is not so valuable anymore. I wonder what the CEOs of Qualcomm, Yahoo and Apple will think? What will the major shareholders think?
This self-proclaimed expert on international issues is not an ordinary "two", but "two" makes the universe invincible. Huawei's revenue is 9 billion? You yourself said it was a profit of 9 billion. You're crazy, you know that? The actual situation is that in 20 18, Huawei's revenue exceeded108.5 billion, which is more than 700 billion RMB (the predicted profit is about 60 billion, and the profit rate is over 8%). 50 billion R&D expenses account for about 7% of revenue. Do you mean Huawei God Operation? Learn some elementary school math knowledge yourself before spraying.
A: Huawei's 5G technology can smash several streets in the United States. The "5E" service marketing in the United States is a conceptual game, which is misleading. It is slightly faster than the original 4G, but it is not a real 5G. Experiments show that China's 5G is 25 times faster than the so-called 5G in the United States.
How to compare C9 19 with Boeing?