Second, in terms of performance and system fluency, Apple is still ahead, especially in terms of performance, and domestic mobile phones cannot surpass it for the time being. The previous generation of A 13 has been able to hang Snapdragon 865, and now there is A 14, which makes Apple not want to upgrade too much on A 14, because it is really wasteful.
Do you know why the iphone always has a fast charge of about 20-30w? Why is Android fast charge always 120w?
The answer is no, you can only use your own 20W fast charging protocol.
Why has Apple been obsessed with using its own charging interface instead of unifying it with the TYPE-C interface of Android phones? TYPE-C is a patent of other companies. If Apple uses this interface, it will have to pay a fee. Apple, like an iron cock, doesn't want to spend a penny more, so it always insists on using its own charging interface. But it also shows that Apple believes that it can do better without being controlled by others.
IPhone has always been charged red, not for anything else, because Apple has to earn mfi certification fees … ..
The two core advantages have been firmly grasped by Apple. Why should Apple spend more money to build a perfect mobile phone? This is unnecessary.
Maximizing profits is the last word!
But then again, Apple uses more than 20w charging power, which is basically above 80% in an hour or so, that is, it will slow down charging after 80. ...
When domestic mobile phones support 66w, 100w or even 120w, Apple's latest model is only 20w, but a large number of old users are still Wufu Anyan. Take glory as an example. Glory 50Pro supports 100w super fast charge, and glory Magic3 supports 66w super fast charge. At this point, Apple still has to work hard!