What's the difference between YONEX's AT900T and AT900P?

AT-900-P steel grade type: racket handle: 7-bit photoetching steel grade; Table buckle: 8-bit photoetching steel grade material: ultra-high strength carbon fiber +gForce Ti composite titanium armor alloy racket handle material: high strength carbon fiber +NiTi memory alloy (ultra titanium /Ultimum Ti) Weight: 3U (85-89g), 4U(80.0-84.9g) Length: 674mm (racket handle length:/kloc-0 Horizontal line: 3U: 22-25kg; 4U: 2 1-24 lbs; Suitable for players: professional level, advanced application technology: 1. The "gForce Ti" special titanium armor alloy on the top of the composite racket frame can produce a greater gravity effect than carbon fiber and improve the hitting energy of the racket. GForce Ti is a special metal compound, which can produce twice the gravity effect of carbon fiber. GForce Ti is set at the top of the racket frame in the first third of the badminton racket, which improves the inertia moment of the racket and increases the energy of hitting badminton. 2. The innovative racket head edge compression structure improves the stability of the racket face by 3%. GForce Ti is a special metal composite titanium armor, which can effectively resist the distortion of the racket frame and improve the ball control ability with the edge compression structure at the top of the racket frame. While enhancing the stability of 3% racket face, it also brings a crisp and solid "metal impact feeling". 3. Higher tension of stay wire. Through the repeated improvement of the durability of the racket frame, the recommended tension of the racket line of ARMORTEC badminton racket has been greatly improved, which meets the needs of some players who like high tension today. However, it must be noted that the high tension of the racket string will cause bad hidden dangers and even injuries to the players' wrists, elbows and shoulders. 4. The titanium armor of the racket head enhances the gravity effect and increases the limit smash speed by 4%. GForce Ti's titanium armor technology combined with the unique cross-sectional compression structure at the top of the racquet frame not only inhibits the distortion of the racquet frame under high load, but also enhances the lightweight and flexibility of the racquet frame, creating a racket with a unique "head-weight effect" and improving the spike speed by 4%. Higher speed, more flexible handling performance and distinctive titanium armor series have become the best weapons for badminton to play quickly. 5.YONEX has developed a new C.S.CAP precision-guided grip cone cover by analyzing the special grip modes of top doubles players, which provides players with faster swing flexibility and adapts to the increasingly rapid doubles confrontation. Compared with the traditional handle cone cover, the new handle cone cover plane of ARMORTEC badminton racket has expanded the practical area by 88%. The innovative cone cover shape and wider contact surface make it easier for the thumb to hold and control the racket and make the high-speed backhand swing faster and more accurate. 6. The racket frame is ISO square, which enlarges the hitting dessert area of the racket face. Compared with the traditional racket, the square racket head can provide 32% more effective hitting area (hitting sweet area), and it can maintain the corresponding accuracy and speed even if it is continuously smashed away from the central area of the racket spool. 7. The internal connection between the racket frame and the racket shaft adopts a built-in T-joint structure to transmit greater hitting power. When hitting the ball vigorously, the torque of the racket frame is transmitted to the T-shaped position of the racket, and the T-shaped position bears huge mechanical load. T-shaped alloy joint with carbon fiber inner layer is embedded in the joint between racket frame and racket shaft, which makes all carbon fiber rackets produced by YONEX high-precision two-stage process perfectly connected into a high-strength integrated racket. This well-known built-in T-joint connection structure is the exclusive patent of YONEX in the world, which makes YONEX racket have both powerful strength and accurate ball control performance: performance characteristics: compared with NS9000s, it is not the same type, NS9000s pays attention to speed, softness and rigidity, and AT900p is characterized by attacking above all else. User comments: 1, but AT900 is not specially designed for doubles, but is named after strength and ball control, and can be used in both singles and doubles. It is said that AT900-P is the image spokesperson of the powerful star Dānlín, while 900-T is an excellent ball control Taufik. 2, AT700 is a good attacker, but it is difficult to get started. AT900 is comprehensive, but it is also an out-and-out offensive racket, which inherits the characteristics of AT series as a whole, but also incorporates NS nanotechnology, thus ensuring excellent performance. Personally, I think it's faster, slightly less powerful than AT700, but better than any NS, and suitable for all-round offensive players. Suitable for the crowd: 1, suitable for golfers who like to kill the ball; 2. Golfers who think the best defense is attack; 3. golfers who like to overwhelm their opponents head on. Comprehensive evaluation: the backcourt is relaxed, the ball is powerful, the control is accurate, and the hand feels solid, giving people a murderous feeling. 900P also has a feeling of wrapping the ball, which is very stressful and will kill 900 p. 900P has the momentum of burning ships on the court, taking you to attack and attack again. It's a cross the rubicon, and the twelve passes of Qin will eventually return to Chu. AT900P compared with AT700 (old model): AT900P(3U, G4, CH, produced in 2007) and AT700 (old model) (3U, G4, CH, produced in 2005), in order to compare NBG95, 23-25 lbs, YY AC 1008. First, the appearance From the appearance point of view, AT900P and AT700 are based on the same design idea, both of which are box-type racket frames and classic "power armor system" design. The difference is that the top of AT900P is made of reticulated titanium armor, while that of AT700 is gforce-ti, that is, coated titanium armor. From the picture, the two beats are very similar, similar to brothers, but personally, AT900P seems to be further beautified on the basis of AT700. The red and black stripes give people a flame-like passion, and the word "power" on them is more like an ancient totem pattern on samurai weapons, which vaguely contains a mysterious power; AT700, on the other hand, gives people a more dignified feeling, more like a simple combat knife, but who can guarantee that something that looks ordinary will not bring great surprises to people? Overall appearance, the personal score of 900P is higher than 700. Second, the weight and balance point are all 3U beats. Holding AT900P in one hand and AT700 in the other, you can feel the weight of AT700. Swinging two beats with the same hand is more obvious on the wrist, and the inertia of AT700 is greater. In the static state with fulcrum balance, the balance point of AT900P is 29 1mm, and that of AT700 is 298mm, with a difference of more than 5mm, which shows that there are still differences in the setting of balance points between the two rackets. Third, the hardness of the racket shaft According to the data provided by YY Company, the hardness of the AT900P racket shaft is greater than that of the AT700, the AT900P racket shaft is shorter than that of the AT700 10mm, and the handle is longer than that of the AT70010 mm. The structural differences lead to different hitting feelings (see below for details). Fourth, shock absorption From the actual use experience, due to the special shape of the box frame combined with the titanium armored racket head, the feel of AT900P and AT700 is still very solid. If carefully distinguished, the hitting feel of AT900P is softer (probably due to the SFC material), while the ball feel of AT700 is slightly clear, which is slightly shocking when hitting the sweet spot, but it is by no means the feeling of shaking hands. In addition, because the AT900P adopts the design of single-line hole, its sweet area is a little larger than that of the traditional AT700. V. Experience (1) It is obviously easier to play golf with AT700 than with AT900P. Because AT series rackets can use the inertia generated by the weight of the head, the hitting point of the golf ball is closer to the bottom line. However, according to my measured service point, under the premise of the same service point and landing point, using AT700 will save some effort than using AT 900 P; When returning the high ball in the middle and backcourt, the hitting point of AT700 ball is deeper than AT900P under the same strength. I think there are three reasons: First, the AT700 racket head is heavier; Second, the bending point of AT700 extended pat is relatively backward; Third, it is softer than AT900P p, so before hitting the ball, the racket shaft bends greatly and the racket face angular velocity is large, which can bring more hitting energy. To be sure, AT700 has some advantages over AT900P in playing high and far balls. (2) When putting the ball in front of the net in the middle and back court, AT900P benefits from the elastic titanium material, and the racket is more elastic than AT700, and the released ball is closer to the front of the net. In the frontcourt, when the opponent is fighting for the ball in front of the net, the bald advantage of AT900P is also reflected. The quality of technical balls such as return and hook is better than that of AT700. Before touching the net, AT900P has an advantage over AT700. When picking the ball in front of the net, including forehand and backhand, the two rackets feel similar, but the elasticity of AT900P is slightly better, but the key is to control the strength of picking the ball, otherwise both rackets may pick the ball out of bounds. In picking up the ball, I think AT900P has a slight advantage. (3) Backcourt backhand is really difficult, so far I can't master it well. It will be the focus of my concentrated practice and compensation in the future. No matter AT700 or AT900P, the return of the ball is passive, but in actual combat, it feels that AT700 is better than at 900 p. When passively returning the ball, the inertia and elasticity brought by the weight and length of the club head of AT700 will make up for the lack of strength of some users. (4) Killing the ball is definitely the focus of the comparison between the two beats. Who is stronger in the same school and city derby? The killing of AT series must be based on the advantage of heavy weight and heavy potential. According to my practical experience, the main differences between AT700 and AT900P are: 1, and the sound killing is different. AT900P's killing sound is very strong, slightly lower; The sound of AT700 killing the ball is "spicy", that is, it is crisp, loud and penetrating. This difference occurs when the feather line, the number of pounds, the type of racket frame and the user are all the same. I think the biggest difference may be related to the different materials of the racket frame and the racket shaft. 2, hitting the ball feels different. When AT900P kills the ball, it feels that the racket "wraps" the ball, which means that the direction of killing the ball can be controlled by 100%, and the landing point is more accurate. When AT700 kills the ball, it feels like it will be killed at the power explosion point. After killing the ball, I feel very fulfilled (of course, it's just a feeling, not necessarily a slap in the face). Although it can be called accurate, it feels not as accurate as at 900 p.3. The killing speed and power are different. Comparing the killing speed of AT900P and AT700, although there is no exact data record, it seems that AT700 kills the ball a little faster and the effect is better, because the success rate of killing the ball for the first time with AT700 is obviously higher than that of AT 900 P. When describing the ball killed by AT700, golfers feel: "The racket is often too late to be fully in place, and the ball killed has downward force. I think the reason still lies in the greater angular velocity and hitting power brought by the heavy racket head and the lengthened racket shaft. 4. The ability to kill the ball continuously is different. In actual combat, I feel that the combo ability of AT900P is better than that of AT700, because the relatively light racket head and lengthened racket handle design of AT900P make the racket swing more flexible, which is conducive to the rapid return of the ball in the combo. Although the lengthening of AT700 bat is beneficial to increase the hitting power, it loses some flexibility. Therefore, to kill the ball with AT700, we should try our best to pursue the effect of killing with one blow. AT900P and NS9000X: 1. Appearance from the appearance, at 900 p looks stronger, probably because of the box racket frame. The light gray-blue word "force" on the top of the racket frame is in harmony with the silvery white background. Seen from a distance, it looks like a pattern. The red and black bottom frame is reminiscent of flame, and there is always an impulse to kill the ball vigorously. The titanium armor on the top is also very delicate. It can be seen that YY's design is not only reflected in the racket technology, but also spent a lot of thought on the appearance of the racket. If the full score is 10, it is not a problem to get 8-9 points for the design of AT900P p. Under its dazzling appearance, NS9000X fully embodies its design idea, which is "speed". The racket frame adopts the broken wind design and bald head design, which improves the swing speed. Coupled with the shiny gold, it must be very cool to play. The unique "stone" pattern and blade pattern of racquet samurai give people a sense of speed and accuracy. The slightly weak racquet rack (with seconds, the weight and balance point are all 3U, and the maximum difference in weight is within 5 grams. I shouldn't be able to simply distinguish by hand. However, when holding AT900P in one hand and NS9000X in the other, you can obviously feel the weight of AT900P's head, and the feeling on your wrist is more obvious when you wave two beats with the same hand, and the inertia of AT900P is greater. In the static state with fulcrum balance, the equilibrium point of AT900P is 29 1mm, and that of NS9000X is 290mm, which shows that there are still differences in design concepts between them. Iii. Hardness of the bat According to the information provided by YY Japan website, the hardness of AT900P, AT900T, NS9000X, NS9000S, AT700 and NS8000 bats from hard to soft is: ns 9000x & gtns8000 & gtat900p = at 900t & gtat700 & gtns9000s. She reflected that AT900P felt a little shaky and NS9000X felt softer. This is basically consistent with my feelings. The racquet shaft of NS9000X is harder than that of AT900P, and both racquet frames are made of elastic titanium. The only difference is that NS9000X also has a real sense frame kernel. Is this the role? In actual use, the feel of AT900P is solid and the ball feel is clear, but in contrast, the feel of NS9000X is delicate. V. Experience (1) It is obviously easier to play high-altitude ball with AT900P than NS9000X. Due to the inertia caused by AT900P's head weight, the high-altitude ball is closer to the bottom line. Judging from my actual service landing point, under the premise of the same strength and service landing point, AT900P service landing point is on the high ball at the bottom line, and NS9000X service landing point is generally on the service line after doubles; When the ball returns to the high ball in the middle and back court, it will fall deeper than before, and sometimes it may be out of line. In the singles match with my golfer, I seized many opportunities through golf. It seems that for ordinary amateurs, AT900P has some advantages over NS9000X in playing golf. (2) AT900P and NS9000X both benefited from the elastic titanium material when putting the ball before the net in the middle and back court. The elasticity of the two rackets satisfied me, and the released balls were close to the net, with no obvious difference. When the opponent plays in front of the frontcourt, the advantages of NS9000X, such as bald head and high speed, can be reflected, and the ball can better realize its tactical intention with delicate and high-quality backswing and oblique hook. At 900P, when the ball in front of the net changes quickly between attack and defense, the inertia caused by the weight of the head directly affects the release effect in front of the net, and it is easy for the opponent to catch the ball or cross the corner in front of the net. On the whole, NS9000X has more advantages than AT900P before touching the net. (3) Picking the ball in front of the net (including forehand and backhand), the elasticity of the two strokes is outstanding, and the ball can be picked out of bounds with a little effort. The characteristics of rackets are basically similar. Controlling the strength of picking up the ball is the key. In picking up the ball, I think they are tied. (4) Backcourt backhand is really difficult, I can't master it well. No matter whether NS9000X or AT900P returns the ball passively, there is no obvious difference in actual combat. But in theory, AT900P may be better than NS9000X, and the inertia and elasticity brought by AT900P's heavy-headed thin rod may make up for some users' lack of their own strength in passive backhand return. (5) Killing the ball is the focus of comparison. I like the carefree feeling that badminton shoots at the opponent's court like an arrow that leaves the string. Personally, killing the ball is not only a technique or scoring method, but also a realm of seizing fleeting opportunities and killing with one blow. In other words, the line in Longmen Inn: "You must kill the ball or you must kill it with one blow." (The original line was "Top players only hit when they have to or have to hit"), so I laughed. Let's start with the killing of NS9000X x. The first time I used NS9000X, I felt quite lethal, but the ball I killed had neither strength nor speed. After a period of use, I gradually became familiar with the performance of the racket. I found that the main reason for the lack of killing power is that the swing speed of NS9000X is slightly faster than that of yy racket used in the past. When I first used it, I didn't master the swing rhythm and missed the best time to kill the ball, so I didn't hit the power explosion point. As we all know, the power to kill the ball is directly proportional to the speed and strength of the swing. NS9000X has the advantage of swing speed, hard racquet frame and stable racquet face. The ultra-hard racket shaft effectively transfers most of the hitting force to the racket face. Therefore, when using NS9000X to kill the ball, there is a feeling that the ball will be shot out as soon as it touches the racket face (just like the feeling of slamming the table tennis with the wooden glossy surface of the table tennis racket). However, I always think that the main reason why NS9000X kills the ball quickly is that the contact time between the ball and the racket face is short (probably because the racket face and the racket shaft are less deformed and rebound faster than other rackets with large deformation), not the power of hitting the ball. The sound of NS9000X killing the ball is very clear. The power of AT900P to kill the ball mainly comes from the heavy design of its "titanium armor" The lethality is heavy, and the sound of killing the ball is also very strong. Although not as crisp as NS9000X, the sound is obviously bigger and more imposing than NS 9000X. When killing the ball with AT900P, there is obviously a feeling that the racket "wraps" the ball, that is, the killing direction can be controlled by 100%, the ball speed is faster (after all, it is the characteristic and selling point of AT series) and the landing point is more accurate (compared with AT700). The carefree feeling after killing the ball is stronger than NS9000X, that is, I feel that I will kill the ball at the point of power explosion. Comparing the killing effect of NS9000X and AT900P, the same thing is that the balls killed by both kinds of beats are fast and the landing point is more accurate. The difference is that AT900P has a stronger sense of killing the ball and a stronger killing sound, but it needs to consume more physical strength; NS9000X consumes less physical strength, but requires higher hitting skills for users. Inappropriate metaphor, if NS9000X is the sword of leaning on heaven, then AT900P must be the dragon slaying way. The above points basically describe my initial experience. Because I haven't used it for a long time, I feel that my level and the performance of the racket need to be further adjusted. I believe that after a period of time, I will have a deeper understanding after the meeting, and then I will communicate with you golfers. AT-900-T steel grade type: racket handle: 7-digit photoetching steel grade; Handle: 8-digit photoetching steel, hitting feeling: hard material: ultra-high elastic carbon+soft titanium alloy+Yonex mesh titanium armor, bat material: high elastic carbon+elastic titanium, weight: 3u (85-89g), 4U(80.0-84.9g), length: 674mm (bat lengthening10 4U: 19-22 lbs; Horizontal line: 3U: 22-25kg; 4U: 2 1-24 lbs; Suitable for players: professional level, advanced application technology: 1. The "gForce Ti" special titanium armor alloy on the top of the composite racket frame can produce a greater gravity effect than carbon fiber and improve the hitting energy of the racket. GForce Ti is a special metal compound, which can produce twice the gravity effect of carbon fiber. GForce Ti is set at the top of the racket frame in the first third of the badminton racket, which improves the inertia moment of the racket and increases the energy of hitting badminton. 2. The innovative racket head edge compression structure improves the stability of the racket face by 3%. GForce Ti is a special metal composite titanium armor, which can effectively resist the distortion of the racket frame and improve the ball control ability with the edge compression structure at the top of the racket frame. While enhancing the stability of 3% racket face, it also brings a crisp and solid "metal impact feeling". 3. Higher tension of stay wire. Through the repeated improvement of the durability of the racket frame, the recommended tension of the racket line of ARMORTEC badminton racket has been greatly improved, which meets the needs of some players who like high tension today. However, it must be noted that the high tension of the racket string will cause bad hidden dangers and even injuries to the players' wrists, elbows and shoulders. 4. The titanium armor of the racket head enhances the gravity effect and increases the limit smash speed by 4%. GForce Ti's titanium armor technology combined with the unique cross-sectional compression structure at the top of the racquet frame not only inhibits the distortion of the racquet frame under high load, but also enhances the lightweight and flexibility of the racquet frame, creating a racket with a unique "head-weight effect" and improving the spike speed by 4%. Higher speed, more flexible handling performance and distinctive titanium armor series have become the best weapons for badminton to play quickly. 5.YONEX has developed a new C.S.CAP precision-guided grip cone cover by analyzing the special grip modes of top doubles players, which provides players with faster swing flexibility and adapts to the increasingly rapid doubles confrontation. Compared with the traditional handle cone cover, the new handle cone cover plane of ARMORTEC badminton racket has expanded the practical area by 88%. The innovative cone cover shape and wider contact surface make it easier for the thumb to hold and control the racket and make the high-speed backhand swing faster and more accurate. 6. The racket frame is ISO square, which enlarges the hitting dessert area of the racket face. Compared with the traditional racket, the square racket head can provide 32% more effective hitting area (hitting sweet area), and can maintain the corresponding accuracy and speed even if it deviates from the central area of the racket spool. 7. The internal connection between the racket frame and the racket shaft adopts a built-in T-joint structure to transmit greater hitting power. When hitting the ball vigorously, the torque of the racket frame is transmitted to the T-shaped position of the racket, and the T-shaped position bears huge mechanical load. T-shaped alloy joint with carbon fiber inner layer is embedded in the joint between racket frame and racket shaft, which makes all carbon fiber rackets produced by YONEX high-precision two-stage process perfectly connected into a high-strength integrated racket. This well-known built-in T-joint connection structure is the exclusive patent of YONEX in the world, which makes YONEX racket powerful and accurate in ball control performance: suitable for players: 1, golfers who like ball control and defense; 2, like to control the ball, cooperate with the players who pull the assault; 3. golfers who like to control the rhythm of the game with four or two strokes. Performance characteristics: the defensive type not only adopts the elastic titanium technology in NS9000, but also adopts the latest soft technology. User comments: However, the AT900 is not specially designed for doubles, but is named after strength and ball control. Both singles and doubles can be used. It is said that AT900-P is the image spokesperson of the powerful star Dānlín, while 900-T is an excellent ball control Taufik. Star selection: Comprehensive evaluation of Taufik's ball control skills: It feels a bit strange, different from the previous racket, unlike the tough feeling of 9x, as if it were the kind of combination of rigidity and softness. Unlike 700, I hold it in my hand, although there are thousands of people, although the lethality is no less than 700. If 9x is a gold mace with a back, Qin 700 with an iron frame is holding a dragon crescent moon blade, and the 900T of a horizontal knife immediately should be able to write small mountains and rivers, sing great rivers and red flowers, and wield a spear of ritual spring to break through the 900P lacking in Helan Mountain, that is a beat. Personally, I think it is an improved version of the old 7, with reduced hardness and weight. The middle pole is slightly less elastic and faster to get started! P is a thick box tee, and T is a series of wind-breaking tees, so T is faster than P in swing and better in stability. Personally, I think P is faster than T and easy to feel! On the middle stroke, T's swing is slightly harder and harder than P's, and T's swing is slightly harder than P's. The two are almost the same, and P's ball is more accurate than T's! Overhand golf. It is easier for P to hit the ball flat, and it is easier for T to hit the ball with a slightly flat arc. T feels better in front of the net than P, and it is easy to make a ball that sticks to the net! T is better than p in defensive backcourt. I can do a lot of blocking with t, but it's hard with p. Both of them are difficult in passive ball. Compared with Ti 103 generation, MP LTD! Summary: I think people with strength will be more violent when using T, and the AT style with moderate distance in P is more stable! P attack, the racket frame is a box design. This design improves the stability and durability of the racket, that is, there is no need to fall. T is technology, and the racket frame is a wind-breaking design (that is, streamlined). This design improves the swing speed, but it is not as powerful as the box design. P kills the ball better than T. T kills the ball better than P except in front of the net and in the backcourt. In addition, both kinds of rackets are relatively heavy, but the racket head of P is a little heavier than that of T. At 900-P: At 4-5 o'clock and at 7-8 o'clock, nano-titanium fiber is added to the racket shaft. Like AT-800/OF, the racket frame is box-shaped to increase durability. AT900-T: racket frame 1-2,10-1,and nano-titanium fiber is added at the racket shaft. Like AT-800/DE, the racquet frame adopts air flow design, which improves the swing speed. P stands for strength, T stands for strength, T stands for skill, and AT900 is technology. All the beats of Yonex use the most technical ones. The biggest difference between P and T is the racket frame structure near the tee except the color. P is the classic box racket frame of AT series (square in cross section), and T is the broken racket frame (similar to diamond in cross section). The box racket frame has great lethality and good continuous killing effect. Break the wind, the racket frame is flexible, the ball is good, and the ball is good. After all, the T of AT series is difficult to get started. Once used, it's easy to use. P's single kill is not as good as AT700, but the serial kill is very good.