Common mistakes in writing patent application instructions

A. not writing according to the eight required parts. Beginners can easily bring their original professional habits into the writing of patent documents before they master the correct writing methods. If someone writes a statement by writing a paper. Generally speaking, writing a thesis is based on theory, supplemented by experimental devices and products, and focuses on establishing a theory, while the patent specification is based on specific technical schemes, and the theoretical explanation is optional. It is also wrong for some people to write patent specifications by writing product specifications.

B. incomplete disclosure. The disclosure of invention and creativity in the specification is to show that the content of the application is novel, creative and practical. The patent office may decide whether to grant the patent right according to the contents given in the specification. Therefore, the contents disclosed in the specification should support the claims, otherwise, the patent right cannot be granted. Some instructions usually explain the functions of products and methods, but do not disclose substantive technical contents, such as the structure of products, the steps of methods, etc. This is not allowed, and it is also impossible to apply for patents.

C. the description does not support the claim. The wording and description of the features used in the claims shall be completely consistent with the specification. Some applicants use a variety of words for a feature at will when writing the specification, which will inevitably lead to the specification not supporting the claim.

D. The tasks and contents of the present invention do not conform to the principle of oneness. Applicants often ignore the principle of "one invention, one application", and it is easy to write the results of a whole process of scientific research into an application, which is also one of the common mistakes.

E. use advertising language, inappropriately belittle the existing technology, and exaggerate one's invention without foundation. In addition, it is not allowed to write many words unrelated to the invention.