You have to understand this well... and say it well... because if the definition of money is not set well... you will definitely lose... because money is not everything (everyone agrees on this). Without money It is absolutely impossible (this sentence must not be used!!! If you use it, you will lose!!! It means this, but you cannot use this sentence!!!)
Rich: understood as having Sufficient funds (be careful to avoid the word money. Use funds instead.)
Leisure: understood as having plenty of time
This understanding is not absolute. This is also part of the debate. The big feature... What does the opponent want to emphasize... You have to analyze the opponent... I can't help you with this... I can't finish what I want to say...
I can only Two points:
1. Under the current circumstances, having enough funds is easier to succeed than having enough time
(Example: China has many patents, They are all inventions and creations of leisurely people, but how many of them have been transformed into products that benefit society, not many, because there are no funds (pay attention to funds!!!). Find some data to explain!)
2. Follow what the other person says. It’s good to have time, and you can do whatever you want, but it’s better to have money. If you win, it’s better. It’s not that the other person’s point of view is bad. You must pay attention to this.
There is actually a lot of information you can check online...but I suggest you just look at it...don't use it raw...use what you understand..
< p>3. Remember one thing from beginning to end. You can follow what the other person says. But you must absolutely believe in your own point of view (even if you don’t believe it in reality. Believe it when you say it. Otherwise, don’t go. Lose) (!).. The purpose of following the other person’s words is to elicit your own point of view...4. You must not say that the other person’s point of view is wrong. At most, you can only say that it is not one-sided. It's not comprehensive enough. In fact, it means that having leisure is right. Having money is a little bit more right. I have always insisted on this point of view.
The debate actually contains a lot of content. It can only be learned and accumulated slowly. Yeah...I used to do this when I was in school. I miss it!!
Come on!
------------- ----------------
After reading some of the views above, I need to remind you. The views are good, but they cannot be used in debates, such as It is useless to say that there is no money for medical treatment. This is because the debate must be active and healthy. This is a basic requirement. If you don’t want to lose, pay attention to your examples and arguments.
There are too many things to pay attention to. .I can’t finish what I have to say, so let’s do this!