The answer is a magical lawsuit

A strange lawsuit

Liu Yanmin

In 1968, a man from Nevada, USA The little girl named Edith knew the first letter "O" of "OPEN" on the gift box. This surprised my mother and asked her how she knew him. Edith said: "Miss Wei La taught her."

After the mother praised her daughter, she filed a complaint against Laura III Kindergarten where Miss Wei La was educated. Because she thought that before her daughter knew "O", she could say "O" as round things such as apples, suns, footballs, eggs, etc. However, since Laura III Kindergarten taught her to read 26 letters, Edith This ability was lost. She held the kindergarten responsible for the consequences and compensated Edith $10 million for her mental disability.

After the complaint was submitted, there was an uproar in Nevada. Laura III Kindergarten thinks the mother is crazy, some parents think she is making a mountain out of a molehill, and her lawyer disagrees, calling the lawsuit a waste of energy. However, the mother insisted on fighting the lawsuit, even if it cost her everything.

Three months later, the case was heard in Nevada State Court. The outcome was unexpected: Laura III Kindergarten lost the case because the 23 members of the jury were moved by a story the mother told in her defence.

She said: I once traveled to a country in the East and saw two swans in a park. One had its left wing clipped, and the other was intact. The one with its wings clipped was left free. In a larger pond, an intact one was released in a smaller pond. I was very puzzled at the time and asked the administrator there for advice. They said this would prevent escapes. I asked why? They explained that those who had one wing clipped could not maintain their balance and would fall off after flying; those in the small pond, although their wings were not clipped, did not have the necessary gliding distance after taking off, so they had to stay in the water. inside. I was very shocked at that time, shocked by the intelligence of Oriental people. But I also feel very sad, sad for the two swans. I am fighting this lawsuit today about my daughter because I feel like Edith has turned into a swan at Laura III Kindergarten. They clipped one of Edith's wings, an imaginary wing, and people had long thrown her into the small pond where there was only ABC.

This paragraph of defense later became the basis for Nevada to amend the "Citizen Education Protection Act". Now the U.S. Civil Rights Act stipulates that young children have the right to play in school. It is unknown whether the inclusion of this right resulted from the mother's lawsuit, but one thing is very clear to Americans: this provision has kept the United States at the forefront of the world in science and technology, and has also led to the emergence of more Other countries have far more young millionaires.

[Appreciation of Excellent Works]

This article describes a weird and bizarre case: more than 40 years ago, in Nevada, the United States, a mother learned the alphabet just because her three-year-old daughter "O" took her daughter's kindergarten to court. The case ended with the kindergarten losing, and the mother receiving $10 million in damages. In fact, the case also contains a strange meaning. After reading this article, we will understand that its social benefits have already far exceeded the value of 10 million US dollars.

This strange lawsuit may seem ridiculous on the surface, but it actually makes sense. Before a child recognizes the letter "O", he can describe "O" as round things such as apples, suns, footballs, and eggs. However, since the kindergarten teacher taught her to read 26 letters, this child has lost this ability. of this imagination. The child's mother believed that the kindergarten teacher had clipped the wings of her daughter's fantasy and caused the child's mental disability, so she took the kindergarten to court.

Logically speaking, what is wrong with teachers teaching children real knowledge? However, what this mother said is not unreasonable. Kindergarten has indeed deprived her daughter of her imagination. This is the fact! When everyone thought this lawsuit was unbelievable and unanimously opposed it, this mother remained steadfast. It was true that "the whole world was drunk but she was alone"! The court is all about evidence. In her defense, the mother used her own personal experience as a factual basis and told a story that shocked and moved everyone.

She vividly compared her daughter to the swan with its wings clipped in the story - those were the wings of her daughter's imagination! This story is conclusive enough to convince the entire human race! Obviously

it is natural for her to win the case.

After reading this article, we can’t help but be impressed by this mother’s outstanding insight. She has shown a unique maternal love for her daughter. What she cares about is definitely not the compensation of 10 million US dollars. It’s about the loss of her daughter’s imagination and future development. From this mother, we see the huge differences between Chinese and American cultures: We value early education and often overemphasize children’s basic education. For example, we focus on how many Chinese characters a child can recognize, how many ancient poems he can memorize, and how many pops he can play. What kind of pictures will the music draw... But we have just ignored one important aspect: that is, suppressing or even depriving children of their imagination.

Recently, the author had the honor to listen to an academic report titled "The Relationship between Modern Literature and Chinese Education" by Mr. Kong Qingdong, a famous contemporary scholar and professor at Peking University, and was quite enlightened. Mr. Kong made this reflection on China’s education. He believed that China’s contemporary education is not “elite education” but “national education”, and unified teaching materials have become a tool to create a generation of “integrated citizens”. For example, after primary school students enter school, what they learn about "heaven, earth, man, knife, mouth, and hands" seems to be a "happy education" on the surface. In fact, it is similar to a "foolish education". "Style education", and it has become a way to strengthen the country. Therefore, we have to adopt such an educational method. It is gratifying that the promulgation of new curricula and the implementation of quality-oriented education in primary and secondary schools across the country have brought infinite vitality and vitality to education in our country. However, the educational customs formed over thousands of years cannot be changed overnight. It seems that quality education focusing on ability cultivation has indeed become the direction and focus of my country's contemporary education reform.

Let our children grow the wings of imagination and soar in the blue sky of the motherland!

[Exploration exercise]

1. Write the idioms in the article according to the meaning of the sentence.

① Get rid of all the family property. ( )

② Metaphor for big disputes or trends. ( )

2． Please summarize the content and purpose of this article in concise language.

3. What is the "strange" reason for filing this lawsuit?

4. What do you think are the differences between Chinese and American education? Why is there such a difference?

5． What are the characteristics of this article in terms of material selection? Please give a brief summary.

6. How did the mother in the article convince the judge to win the lawsuit and draw public attention to this issue when no one supported her?

7. What do you think after reading this article?

[Reference Answer] 1. ① Go bankrupt ② Uproar *** 2. Content: Edith’s mother sued the kindergarten for teaching literacy to stifle her daughter’s imagination. After winning the lawsuit, Edith’s mother’s defense became the basis for Nevada to amend the Citizens’ Education Protection Act. Purpose: ① Cultivating children's imagination during play is more important than imparting knowledge. ② It is more important for children to develop imagination during play than to learn knowledge. ③Do not impart knowledge to children too early, as this will restrict the development of their imagination. 3． ① Qi Qi is suing for damage to his daughter’s imagination. ②Qi Qi was sued for teaching students to read letters in kindergarten. 4. Difference: my country attaches great importance to early education and often overemphasizes children's basic education but ignores the cultivation of children's abilities; the United States does not pay attention to basic education but focuses on cultivating children's imagination and creativity. Reason: Education in our country is shackles of "exam-oriented". Schools focus on increasing the enrollment rate, teachers focus on imparting knowledge, and parents focus on scores. Everyone hopes that their children can get into a good school. 5. The selection of materials in this article is novel and unique, typical and accurate. The specific manifestations are as follows: ① The selected examples are small things that are very common in teaching life; ② See the big from the small, and gain insight into the chronic diseases of teaching concepts from small things; ③ Point out the importance of imagination cultivation and the fruitful results it brings—— "The United States has always been at the forefront of the world in science and technology, and it has also produced many more young millionaires in the United States than other countries." ④ Describing the conflict between two educational concepts, it opens up the subject matter of legal literature and gives people A refreshing experience.

6. The mother told a story in court, cleverly using metaphors to explain the truth in a popular way, and making the argument poetic. The clipping of the swans' wings and the confinement of the swans in a small space allows us to see the cruelty of the "manager", which leads to the similarity between the "management" of the "little girl" in the kindergarten and the situation of the swans with mutilated wings and under house arrest. , shocking people's souls - this essential connection made everyone suddenly aware of the negligence and cruelty in this habit. Winning the case is reasonable and winning is significant. The last paragraph is a full explanation of the significance of this lawsuit. 7． It is an open question, as long as it makes sense. Should the relevant civil litigation be terminated after the administrative litigation case is filed?

After the administrative litigation case is filed, the relevant civil litigation and civil disputes can be applied for collective settlement and should be terminated.

"Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China"

Article 61 Involves administrative licensing, registration, expropriation, expropriation and adjudication of civil disputes made by administrative agencies In administrative litigation, if the parties apply to resolve relevant civil disputes together, the People's Court may hear them together.

In administrative litigation, if the People's Court believes that the trial of administrative cases needs to be based on the judgment of civil litigation, it may rule to suspend the administrative litigation. Litigation cases generally have to go to court several times from the submission of a pleading to the conclusion of the case.

Theoretically, at least twice.

A case is filed once and the court is opened once. If the court session goes smoothly, the case can be concluded in court. . . . Seek civil litigation cases

The facts and laws are in your favor, but you have no choice but to lose the case if you don’t understand the procedures

Author: Admin Release time: 2007-6-21 Read: 353 times

Mr. Wang is friends with the boss of a company in Shenzhen. In November 1999, Mr. Wang signed a purchase and sales agreement with the company. The agreement stipulated that Mr. Wang would be responsible for product sales in the Shandong Province market. Mr. Wang agreed with the Shandong customer After the sales contract is signed, the company will deliver goods to Shandong customers based on the contract information sent by Mr. Wang. The Shandong customers will remit the payment to the company's account, and Mr. Wu will draw a 5% commission for each transaction. After the contract was signed, Mr. Wang began to be responsible for the company's sales work in Shandong Province. As of March 2005, Mr. Wang had been working for six years. During this period, some customers in Shandong Province owed the company a total of 210,000 yuan in payment.

Questioner: Should I repay the payment owed by Shandong customers?

Lawyer: First, let’s analyze the agreement you signed with a company in Shenzhen in October 1999. The agreement is actually an agency contract. You are engaged in agency behavior within the agency license. , the sales risk is borne by the agent, and purchase and sale is a buying and selling behavior. After the buyer receives the goods and continues to sell, the sales risk is borne by himself.

Questioner: The name of the agreement we signed is a purchase and sale agreement. How can it be recognized as a supply and sale agreement?

Lawyer: According to the provisions of the "Contract Law", the nature of the contract is not determined based on the name of the contract, but the substantive content of the contract. Therefore, based on the content of your appraisal agreement, it should be determined to be an agency contract. The two parties have an agency relationship.

Consultant: In February 2005, the company issued a statement for me to sign. It has been done before, but this time the company made a note on the statement, which read: Mr. Wang, a customer from Shandong A certain person owed the company 210,000 yuan in payment for goods. Because it had been done before, I signed the contract without looking carefully.

Lawyer: Arrears are actions based on facts. Since there is no basic fact of arrears between the company and you, your signature on this statement An act is an act of misunderstanding and can be undone.

Questioner: But the company sued me based on this statement, and the court ruled that I lost the case. Why? You see this is the verdict.

Lawyer (after reading the judgment): The judgment holds that you have no evidence to prove that there is no purchase and sale relationship between you and the company, only an agency relationship. Excuse me, have you submitted the agreement to the court?

Consultant: I brought all the materials with me to the court session, but the other party’s lawyer said that they would not allow cross-examination.

Lawyer: Have you received the court’s notice for producing evidence? There is a deadline for producing evidence on the draft notice.

Questioner: What is the notice of proof and the time limit for proof?

Lawyer: The time limit for producing evidence, also known as the time limit for producing evidence, refers to the time limit within which a party must submit evidence to the court or the other party within a specific period. Otherwise, corresponding liability will arise if it is exceeded. During the course of the lawsuit, the court will serve you with a notice of production of evidence and inform you of the time limit for production of evidence. You must submit evidence within the time limit for production of evidence.

Consultant: I did not receive the notice of proof! This is the material the court gave me. Please take a look.

Lawyer (after reading): Isn’t this a notice to produce evidence?

Consultant: The court gave me so much material, but I thought it was useless!

Lawyer: The court has served you with a notice of production of evidence. You did not produce evidence within the time limit specified in the notice of production of evidence. When the court opened, your production of evidence exceeded the time limit for production of evidence. Since the other party did not agree to cross-examination, so, The court ruled that you had no evidence to prove it. This is why you lose the case because you don’t understand the procedures.

Consultant: This is so unreasonable. I have reason and evidence, but just because I did not meet the deadline within the stipulated time limit, it is so unfair that I lose the case!

Lawyer: Our country has established a time limit system for producing evidence in order to prevent parties from taking advantage of the program to carry out surprise attacks. Delaying litigation is an improvement. In the past, during civil trials in our country, parties could do whatever they wanted during the entire first-instance litigation process. Proposing "supplementary evidence" or "new evidence seriously affects the seriousness of the law, the authority of the judge, the legitimacy of the parties' evidence-producing actions, and the timeliness and orderliness of the proceedings. Now that there is a time limit for the production of evidence, these issues can be resolved Overcoming it can better reflect the fairness and impartiality of the law.

Members of the voluntary legal service team of "Baoan Daily": Guangdong Shenbao Law Firm

Lawyer: Wei Hanping

-------------------------------------------------- -----------------------

Creditor lost lawsuit due to improper use of program

July 13, 2005< /p>

1. Brief introduction to the case On June 22, 2000, the plaintiff Li Yi was on his way home from school while climbing a 10 kV high-voltage electric pole for fun. He was injured by an electric shock and severed his right arm at a high level. After forensic examination, He was diagnosed with a second-level disability and required the preparation of prosthetic assistive devices to compensate for some of the functions. In order to claim compensation, the plaintiff Li Yi filed a lawsuit with the Xiangfan City Intermediate Court on March 6, 2003, requesting an order against the defendant Laohekou City Power Supply Bureau (hereinafter referred to as the Power Supply Bureau) compensated 1.18 million yuan for the prosthetic limb.

2. Trial Situation i Hubei Province Xiangfan Intermediate Court based on the "Prosthetic Limb Certificate" issued by the Xiangfan Prosthetic Limb Station provided by the plaintiff, estimated that the prosthetic limb cost before adulthood was 25. Ten thousand yuan per device, combined with the total cost of prosthetic limbs after adulthood was 1.18 million yuan, the defendant was ordered to pay 80% compensation of 945,160 yuan to the power supply bureau.

The verdict of this case aroused strong repercussions in the society. "Xiangfan Evening News" once reported in the article "Sky-high Compensation". Later, CCTV also made two corresponding reports.

The defendant, the Power Supply Bureau, ruled that the cost of the prosthetic limb was seriously excessive. Gao Weiyuan appealed and requested that the verdict be changed.

The Hubei Provincial Higher People’s Court held a hearing and found out that the prosthetic fee standard determined in the first instance was the price of foreign products. A mediation agreement was reached: the defendant Power Supply Bureau compensated the plaintiff Li Yi for the loss of 300,000 yuan in the electric shock accident.

3. Lawyer’s Comment: This lawyer did not participate in the first-instance proceedings, but represented the defendant Power Supply Bureau in the second-instance proceedings. After reviewing the case, it was believed that the focus of this case was to accurately define the amount of prosthetic limbs based on the principle of foreseeability of compensation, and based on this starting point to start agency work, it was found that the prosthetic limbs specified in the "Prosthetic Limb Certificate" issued by Xiangfan Prosthetic Limb Station. The price of French maternity prostheses does not comply with legal regulations.

Because according to Article 4 of the "Interpretations of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Trial of Personal Damage Compensation Cases for Electric Shock": "The cost of disability equipment must be calculated based on the cost of domestic popular equipment with a hospital certificate", Xiangfan The prosthetic station issued a "Certificate of Prosthetic Limbs" that cost 250,000 yuan per device for smart prostheses, which was the price of a prosthetic limb made in France, while the price of a domestically produced prosthetic limb was 26,000 yuan per device. The original judgment used the price of a prosthetic limb made in France as the amount of damage. The basis is contrary to the provisions of the judicial interpretation on defining losses based on the price standard of "domestic popular appliances".

While the first-instance verdict of this case was passive, the second-instance firmly grasped the key points of the original verdict’s improper admission of evidence and incorrect prediction of the cost of prosthetic limbs, and carried out agency work, ultimately leading to a mediation agreement, which resulted in the settlement of 945,000 yuan. The high compensation fee of RMB 300,000 was reduced to RMB 300,000, which has achieved the expected effect of the power supply bureau’s appeal.

1. Introduction to the case.

The defendant Dai Fengyong was an employee of the plaintiff Suizhou Vehicle Factory and had been in charge of the sales work of Nanfang Film for the plaintiff. From 1995 to 1997, the defendant handled *** shipments worth 2.03 million to customers of Nanfang Film Duoyuan recovered more than 1.5 million yuan, leaving 540,184.13 yuan uncollected.

Previously, the plaintiff internally formulated a "Sales Management System", which stipulated in Article 7 that sales personnel handle external shipments. If the payment cannot be recovered, the sales personnel will compensate. Accordingly, on June 10, 1998, the defendant issued a "Repayment Agreement" to the plaintiff for the unrecovered money, promising to repay 540,184.13 yuan. After being urged by the plaintiff, the defendant failed to repay the debt on time, so the plaintiff filed a lawsuit in Suizhou Intermediate People's Court to assert the creditor's rights.

2. Trial situation.

Hubei Suizhou Intermediate People’s Court, as the court of first instance, accepted the case for trial and made a judgment (2003) Suiminchuzi No. 20, deeming the repayment agreement to be legal and valid, and ordered the defendant to repay the debt in accordance with the agreement. Repay 540,184.13 yuan and bear legal fees of 12,000 yuan.

The defendant was dissatisfied with the first-instance judgment and entrusted our lawyer to represent him and appealed to the Hubei Provincial High People’s Court. After hearing, the Provincial High Court held that the civil dispute between the two parties was not a civil dispute between equal parties. The plaintiff's claim should not be supported, and the (2005) Eminzhongzi No. 11 ruling was made: the first instance judgment was revoked and the plaintiff's lawsuit was directly dismissed. So far, the repayment agreement held by the plaintiff still cannot realize its creditor's rights.

3. Lawyer’s analysis.

The reason why the plaintiff lost the case and failed to realize the 540,184.13 yuan claim was because it improperly characterized the legal relationship and made an error in the selection process.

After accepting the entrustment, our lawyer formed an agency view after investigation and research, that is, the claim claimed by the plaintiff is not a property relationship between equal subjects, but a labor dispute arising from the implementation of internal systems, which is not appropriate. The case shall be accepted directly by the People's Court. The reasons are as follows: The defendant is a staff member of the plaintiff and is responsible for the sales work (delivery and payment collection) in the southern region. The two parties have a labor relationship that manages and is managed. The rights and obligations of the labor relationship, except for the labor contract signed by both parties, , the employer's rules and regulations bind workers on the premise that they are not illegal, and are essentially an integral part of the labor contract. In this case, Article 7 of the plaintiff's "Sales Management System" stipulates the liability of sales personnel for compensation.

It can be seen that the payment obligations determined in the "Repayment Agreement" formed later are essentially the implementation of the liability for compensation in the "Sales Management System". In other words, the defendant is assuming the responsibilities in the labor contract.

According to the spirit of the Supreme People's Court's "Reply on whether the court will accept disputes arising from long-term outstanding debts of employees performing official duties at the unit", in this kind of labor relationship with personal attributes, the claims formed due to the performance of duties Debt disputes do not belong to property relations between equal subjects, but to labor relations. Disputes arising from labor relations should follow the procedural principle of arbitration first and trial later. If the plaintiff directly files a lawsuit without arbitration, it does not comply with the procedural provisions and the lawsuit should be dismissed.

In the second instance, the Hubei Provincial Higher People’s Court adopted the above point of view and finally dismissed the plaintiff’s lawsuit directly from the program.

July 2, 2005

Excerpted from Hualu.com

The above are all from How to check Internet litigation cases

Go Check with the filing division of the court to see who the judge is, and ask for the judge's number and contact the judge

What is a "monkey lawsuit"?

In his scientific masterpiece "The Origin of Species", Darwin used the theory of evolution to overturn "creationism" and completed a leap in mankind's understanding of the natural world. However, in the 66th year after the publication of "The Origin of Species" and the 43rd year after Darwin's death, in the United States, which is known as the most developed country, a ridiculous "ape lawsuit" occurred.

The defendant was put on trial for explaining Darwin's theory of evolution in class and was eventually fined $100.

In the early 1920s, an anti-evolution movement led by Democratic politician Bryan arose in American society. This trend had such a great impact on American politics that in 1923 Florida Congress passed a resolution stating that "Darwinism, atheism, and agnosticism" should not be taught as truth in the state's public schools. The 1925 Tennessee law more clearly declared: All universities, normal schools, and other public schools at all levels in the state, if any of their teachers teach any heresy that denies the biblical doctrine that God created man, will be punished as illegal.

As this trend spread, on May 7, 1925, Bryan, together with the local police in Dayton, Tennessee, filed a lawsuit in court, accusing Scopes, a young local biology teacher, in class. Teaching evolution is a violation of state law. The indictment read: "If humans evolved from apes, then what did God do?" The Dayton Town Court decided to open a hearing on the case on July 10.

This case shocked the entire United States. On the day of the trial, many prestigious professors and scientists came to the court to prepare to defend the defendant. More than 100 reporters swarmed in to cover the event. Fundamentalist believers from the mountains near the town of Dayton came to cheer Brian on. The small town with a population of only 1,500 people suddenly became excited.

The plaintiff's main lawyer is Bryan, the leader of the anti-evolution movement. He is an eloquent speaker and has been elected as the presidential candidate by the Democratic Party three times. The defendants were represented by three prominent lawyers. The lineups on both sides were staggering, but the jury was dwarfed by them. Among the 12 jurors, three had never read any books except the Bible, and one was actually illiterate.

The next day, the prosecution began and the court summoned witnesses. Two of Scopus's students timidly testified that Scopus had taught them evolution. But the two added that they had not been poisoned. At this time, Brian brandished a biology textbook and condemned the scientists who came to Dayton to defend the defendant: "The Bible will never be driven out of the court by experts who have come from thousands of miles away."

At noon on the third day, it was the jury's turn to make a verdict. The jurors gathered in a corner of the lawn and deliberated quietly for nine minutes before the judge finally announced the verdict: the defendant Scopes was fined $100 and had to pay all trial costs. $100 was a lot of money at the time. This is a classic lawsuit in the history of American science and law—the "Ape Lawsuit." Defendant in a civil lawsuit

Reading answers to determine whether magical cloning is possible

Cloning is the transliteration of the English "clone" or "cloning", and the English "clone" originated in Greece The original meaning of the word "Klone" is to use seedlings or twig cuttings to cultivate plants through vegetative or vegetative propagation, such as cuttings and grafting. In mainland China, it is translated as "asexual reproduction", while in Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao, it is generally translated as copying, transcolonization or group reproduction. Chinese also has more precise words for cloning, "asexual reproduction", "clonalization" and "pure lineation". Cloning refers to the asexual reproduction of organisms through somatic cells, and a population composed of offspring individuals with identical genotypes formed by asexual reproduction. Biotechnology is usually used to produce individuals or populations that have exactly the same genes as the original individual through asexual reproduction. The answer to the magical Tiankeng and Earth Fissures

The World Wonder Tiankeng

The Earth Fissures Scenic Area is located in the southern mountainous area of ??Fengjie County, west of the Three Gorges of the Yangtze River.

It borders Qutang Gorge of the Three Gorges Scenic Area to the north, Hubei Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture to the south, and Wushan Longgupo Ancient Human Cultural Site to the east. It is 37.5 kilometers long from east to west, 19.5 kilometers wide from north to south, and covers an area of ??340 square kilometers. It governs five major scenic areas: Tiankeng and Ground Fissures, Longqiao River, Maze River, Jiupan River, and Maocaoba. The lowest altitude is 236.4 meters, and the highest altitude is 2084.2 meters. The section from Tianjingxia Bridge to Huituishi that has been developed in the ground crack is about 5 kilometers long. There is a plank road from Luojiaping down to the ground crack, forming a loop. It is dotted with scenic spots, with many strange cave shafts and countless legends. The rocks on both sides of the bank are in various shapes. On the rock walls, the jungle blocks out the sky and the sun, and the forest is dense and dense. The gap between the tiankeng and the ground is a long and colorful scroll, with stone forests, caves, depressions, shafts... everything that can accommodate eternal treasures.

The Tiankeng is located in Xiaozhai Village, Jingzhu Township, Fengjie County. The maximum diameter of the mouth is 626 meters, the minimum diameter is 537 meters, the maximum diameter of the pit bottom is 522 meters, the vertical height is 666.2 meters, and the total volume is 11934.8 meters. Ten thousand cubic meters, it is the karst funnel with the largest depth and volume in the world. The entrance to the Tiankeng is surrounded by cliffs, which are as majestic as an ax chopping with a knife. There are countless deep and unpredictable caves and a surging underground river in the pit. Chinese and Western explorers have explored the tiankeng many times and discovered that the underground river in the tiankeng flows to the Maze River through the outlet hole. It is speculated that the underground river in the tiankeng comes from a mysterious crack in the earth.

The gap between the Tiankeng and the ground is a colorful scroll. Here, you can see the various karst landscapes. Stone forests, peak forests, karst caves, depressions, natural bridges, falling water streams, blind valleys, funnels, shafts...it is all inclusive of Yongzhen. In particular, the Xiaozhai Tiankeng, which ranks first in the world, and the strange and mysterious ground cracks, make viewers fascinated and impressed, marveling at the miraculous craftsmanship of nature. At the same time, the clear blue trickling streams, primitive pastures and lush forests in the high mountains and ridges form a paradise on earth. At the same time, because it is more than 1,000 meters above sea level, it has become the best place to escape the summer heat and enjoy the snow scenery. Moreover, the mountain countryside style here is more like a rich Tujia love song, and its simple folk customs have attracted countless Chinese and foreign tourists.

The Tiankeng and Ground Seam Scenic Area is located in the south of Fengjie County, Chongqing City, at the western end of the Three Gorges of the Yangtze River. It is part of the Qiyaoshan Mountains and Wushan Mountains, covering an area of ??more than 400 square kilometers. The entire scenic area is divided into Xiaozhai Tiankeng , Tianjing Gorge ground fissure, Maze River, Longqiao River, Jiupan River, Taoyuan River, Longmen Bridge, Maocaoba, Qingyan, Jianshan and other ten major areas. The four areas we are going to visit this time are the Tiankeng, Ground Fissure, Maze River, and Longqiao River. They are the most exciting and officially opened parts of the entire scenic area. This scenic area borders Lichuan City, Enshi City and Jianshi County in Hubei Province to the south, Wushan County of Chongqing City to the east, and is about 50 kilometers away from Fengjie County.

Tiankeng is the common name for the funnel in karst geology in geography. There are so many sinkholes in this area that it is almost impossible to count them. There is one almost every few hundred meters away. Some sinkholes are as small as a tea cup, and some are as big as a golf ball. There is a very large sinkhole in Xiaozhai Village, Jingzhu Township, with the largest diameter of the sinkhole. It is 626 meters, the depth of the pit is 666.2 meters, and the maximum diameter of the bottom of the pit is 522 meters. It is the largest funnel found in the world. The crack in the ground is also a unique wonder that Chinese and foreign scientists are full of praise for. Between the two valleys, there is a mysterious deep valley shaded by trees. From a distance, it looks like a big gap in the earth.

Fengjie Tiankeng Ground Cracks (2 photos)

The most amazing thing is that the clear green stream has carved a magical and huge underground cave group in this limestone area. Professor Wan Xinnan of Chengdu University of Technology, who led several French explorers here, said that he has been to many scenic spots and feels that this is the most magical place, with various geology and strange caves. The entire scenic spot is almost " Full of holes." British and French explorers were full of praise, calling it "the world's first-class magical cave." Since 1994, explorers from China, the United Kingdom, France, and Ireland have visited Fengjie many times and discovered a huge underground cave system. However, after seven or eight explorations, they have only understood a corner of it. So far, they have discovered the world's largest funnel Xiaozhai Tiankeng, the Tianjing Gorge ground fissure with the widest to narrowest ratio in the world, and an underground river that has not yet been fully understood but is indeed a world-long underground river—— Longqiao River. It is still unclear how many caves there are in the tiankeng and the ground. It is still a mystery whether there will be any amazing world-class landscapes here.

The caves in the Tiankeng Dikai Scenic Area have attracted the attention of scientists and explorers at home and abroad. We believe that its mysterious veil will gradually be unveiled.

In August 1996 and December 1997, Mr. Andy, Secretary-General of the International Cave Exploration Association, personally led an expedition team to conduct an inspection of the Earth's Crevice. Due to the limitations of the exploration equipment, the underground caves in the Earth's Creation There are many changes, and the Sino-British joint expedition has only advanced a few kilometers in the cave. What other strange sights there are in this mysterious world? Whether the underground river in the gap is connected to the world's largest funnel Xiaozhai Tiankeng, and whether there are some strange creatures are still a mystery to be explored.

To go to Tiankeng and Difu, you can take a bus directly from Chongqing to Fengjie, or you can take a bus to Wanzhou and then take a speedboat to Fengjie, and then take a bus from Fengjie to Tiankeng and Difu, which takes 1 hour (starting at 6 a.m. There is a bus every hour from 1 to 4 p.m.). From Enshi, you can go to Sanjiangba or Fengjie. There are buses between 06.00 and 15.00, and they also go to Suobuya along the way.

The above content is taken from Baidu Encyclopedia. I am from Fengjie Triangle Dam, Chongqing. The above content is true and valid. Answers to the magical yurt reading

Evergreen forever, a green green *** flow

Dozens A polished wooden stick of the same thickness, connected with a cowhide rope, and a retractable mesh support.

An umbrella-shaped roof support supported by wooden sticks. Specific title

The biggest advantage of the yurt is that it is easy to disassemble and assemble, making it easy to move.

Make analogies, list numbers, make comparisons, give examples