Seven Gong Ping Ball, rational discussion.
MVP in the regular season and MVP in the finals have a lot of gold. But to compare carefully, the gold content of MVP is still greater than that of FMVP.
the highlight performance that lasts for a whole season is more difficult than a series. There are 82 games in a season, and the whole front line runs from October to April of next year, which lasts for half a year. Not only must there be continuous highlights, but also records, and more importantly, there must be extraordinary physical strength and body. Too many stars lose the qualification to compete for MVP because of insufficient games. Although FMVP is difficult and valuable, it is not as difficult as MVP in terms of time span. Looking at the winners of two honors in recent 2 years, we will find some interesting phenomena.
from this MVP form, we can easily find that all the winners were the first-line superstars at that time, and the lowest ones could rank in the top five of the league.
Although this FMVP form is also Starlight Glimmer, it is obvious that several winners were not the top stars in the league at that time, and some even failed to rank in the top 2 of the league. This shows that FMVP is relatively accidental. Therefore, comprehensively, the gold content of MVP is higher.
The gold content of MVP in the regular season must be higher than that in the finals. The former is an assessment of the performance of superstars throughout the year, while the latter is limited to the finals series, which has greater variables and subjective influence.
Counting all the players in naismith Basketball Hall of Fame, regular season MVP can almost be regarded as a stepping stone. Up to now, including all active players, the player who won the MVP in the regular season, but may eventually miss the Hall of Fame, I am afraid that Ross is the only one who broke his wings early. In contrast, the finals produced too many lucky people and wills.
for a long time, the controversy about finals MVP can be roughly summarized into two points. First, the gap between the two candidates is very small. In the 24 finals, the pistons beat the Zijin Army 4-1, and Billups and ben wallace also contributed. But in the end, david stern awarded the finals MVP trophy to Billups, making him the grassroots MVP at that time. In 28, the Big Three of the "Green Shirts" defeated the Lakers led by Kobe Bryant 4-2, and the data and role of Pierce and Garnett were also equal. But the drama of "The Return of the King" helped Pierce win the gold cup.
secondly, it is the lucky factor. In the 27 finals, when the west was strong and the east was weak, the Spurs swept the "first brother" knight 4-, and the one-sided game made Parker as fast as a horse, not Duncan. There is also the 215 finals. Iguodala won the MVP trophy as an Indiana Jones and pressed Curry with comprehensive data, which also reflected the uncontrollable nature of the award.
In contrast, regular season MVP requires superstars to play phenomenal performances against the other 29 teams in the league, and the performances of some focus campaigns will be magnified and examined. It can be seen that the gold content of regular season MVP is far greater than that of finals MVP. (Wen H)
As the highest honor hall of basketball in the world, the NBA is unique in terms of players' strength, wonderful games and commercial operation, and it is also very domineering in trophy design. Unlike our previous MVP trophy, it's like a fruit bowl.
When it comes to the contest between MVP and finals MVP, Jerry West, an ancient superstar logo man, Black Mamba Kobe Bryant, a recently retired superstar, and Stephen Curry, an active superstar, are always three characters that cannot be avoided. It can be said that the contest between MVP and FMVP has a great relationship with them.
MVP and FMVP are both very representative awards. It's really hard to say who can hold these two trophies. Kobe has only one MVP, but can you say that his post is lower than James's? As a pioneer in the era of small ball, Curry has two MVPs, but he is empty-handed on FMVP, but you can't deny Curry's greatness and influence. West, a tragic hero, is the only defeated FMVP in history. His strength conquered opponents and alliances. It varies from person to person, and it's really hard to say which is more sufficient, and individuals are more inclined to FMVP.
MVP represents a player's personal peak season, not only with super individual strength, but also with very good stability and good physical support. There are 82 games in the regular season, with a four-month schedule, in which the confrontation and loss can be imagined. The average player can't get good data at all and it lasts for a long time. It can be said that this is the patent of superstars. In addition, there must be a very high record bonus to prove the outstanding ability of leading the team, but also to have a good relationship with the media. The mvp voting is largely related to the media, and James has done a good job in leading the team and the media. This also allowed him to successfully get four MVP achievements, while Kobe Bryant had a hard time renting on the road of MVP because of the media and the Eagle County incident that year, but there was only one MVP in his 2-year career.
Winning the MVP doesn't necessarily mean winning the championship, while winning the FMVP means winning all championships except West. Moreover, FMVP is mostly the product of the core of the team, and the weight of the championship is higher than any award. You can ask Buckley and Malone whether they want MVP or championship, and Kobe sent him a text message after James joined the Heat. "Go, go after the next MVP, but we will win the championship" and Jordan mocked Warriors general manager Miles, so what if 73 liters? No championship is nothing. This is the attraction of FMVP and the championship.
Of course, there are exceptions. Wei Shao averaged three pairs per game, but only ranked sixth in the West, but he still beat Harden to win the MVP, but who knows that there are more emotional factors? More is an affirmation of Wei Shao's persistence. When FMVP was given to Iguodala, Curry's full face of questions was also speculated as a contest of sponsors. Now Durant has robbed Curry of two FMVPs, and Curry has not lost his eyes and made everyone feel distressed. Can he still win the FMVP trophy?
The same is true. You can't get there without the figure of the old rascal Jordan. The honor is just like that.
This can't be generalized, but generally speaking, the mvp in the regular season must be the player with the best comprehensive performance this season, but not in the finals. Some players were born for big scenes, won the championship with the team under certain conditions, and won the finals mvp because of their excellent performance in the finals, which is somewhat opportunistic. The specific analysis is as follows:
The MVP in the regular season needs to play a top level in 82 regular games and lead the team to rank at the same time.
The finals MVP only needs to perform well in four to seven games (best of seven) in the finals, and sometimes only needs to perform well in two or three games. Generally, it appears in the champion team, not necessarily the player with the best data. For example, Iguodala, the MVP of the 215 NBA Finals, is just a role player of the Warriors, not a big-name star, and the data is not particularly prominent. Therefore, the regular season MVP has more gold.
Thanks for inviting me. If we talk about the gold content, we can compare the number and number of MVP and FMVP winners first:
Up to now, the NBA has awarded MVP 71 times, with a total of ***38 winners, 23 winners once, 6 winners twice and 9 winners three times or more. Eleven consecutive MVP winners: Russell, Chamberlain, Jabbar, Bird, Moses Malone, Johnson, Jordan, Duncan, Nash, James and Curry.
Let's look at the FMVP awarded 48 times, and ***3 people won it, 2 people won it once, 5 people won it twice, 5 people won it three times or more, and 5 people won it twice or more in a row: Jordan, Dream, O 'Neill, Kobe Bryant and James.
MVP is more about the recognition of a player's stable state throughout the season, while FMVP is basically the ultimate winner in a more intense finals stage. Through the comparison of the above data, on the whole, the chance of obtaining FMVP once cannot be denied, but it is more difficult to obtain it continuously than MVP, so I personally think that the gold content of obtaining FMVP continuously is higher than that of obtaining MVP continuously, and the gold content of obtaining FMVP once is even worse than that of single MVP.
it depends on how you say it.
Those who have won MVP's Sanlian Village are Chamberlain Russell Bird, those who have won FMVP's Sanlian Village are Jordan O 'Neill. Jordan took it twice.
Jordan's MVP was robbed by Buckley and Karl Malone respectively after he reached the MVP three times in a row, but Jordan immediately nailed these two miserable MVPs to the position of no title for life with two 4:2 and two classic finals and two FMVPs. Do you think MVP is better or FMVP is better?
MVP is an important individual award, but the temptation behind it is far less than that of FMVP, because FMVP means that the team has reached the finals and won the championship. Of course, there are exceptions. For example, West robbed other people's FMVP as a loser, but this phenomenon is unique. After all, there are not many players who are as handsome as West and play the ball so well.
MVP provides an opportunity for those who can't win the championship as a whole, but the players are superior in personal strength. Like westbrook, harden, durant, etc. I specially pulled Thunder Sanshao out to show my face because their MVP really proved their superior strength, but Wei Shao and Harden are likely to have no championship. It is better for everyone to change a few FMVPs together and share the championship.
Therefore, if the gold content is money, that fool will choose FMVP. Because the finals are proof of the strength of the team. A typical example is the piston, which won the championship three times since the 198s, relying on the overall strength. Du Masi Thomas and somebody won the FMVP respectively. The regular season MVP has nothing to do with them. But who can say that such a piston is not an admirable team?
All bosses like this team. As long as it is well managed, it can continue to be a strong team for a long time.
An MVP is definitely more important than an FMVP. For example, Ross has a stronger historical position than Billups. But two MVPs are definitely not as good as two FMVPs, because FMVP has the bonus of the championship. For example, Nash's historical position is not as good as Leonard's. The higher the comparison, the stronger the FMVP is than the MVP. If Kobe adds an MVP, his historical position may not change much, and he is basically seventh to ninth, but if he adds an FMVP, Kobe will remain in the top five. This is the reason why FMVP is stronger than MVP.
regular season MVP has higher gold content.
The gold content here refers to the player's play.
why?
the regular season is 82 games, and the finals are up to 7 games. It's as simple as that.
the efficiency of 82 games is much more difficult than the efficiency of up to 7 games.
However, for top NBA stars, perhaps they care more about an FMVP.
why?
because it means winning the championship, which is the most important thing.
in 27, the MVP Nowitzki's performance in the regular season was impeccable. Being blacked out by the Jinzhou gang in the playoffs left behind a frustrated figure.
Nowitzki led the Mavericks to the finals in 211, and won FMVP in six finals with unparalleled performance.
which seems more successful and important?
Think about Buckley. Every time he opens his mouth, how do people retort?
"A person without a championship is not qualified to judge me."
Ordinary players need an MVP to prove that they are top players, while top players may prefer an FMVP to prove that they have won the championship.
MVP means that you are the best player in the league and your leading performance is excellent.
In NBA games, although there are two awards representing the most valuable players in a season, the difference of one letter makes the gold content of the two awards very different. Why do you say that? Because MVP represents the best player in the regular season, while FMVP represents the best player in the finals, of course, the premise is that the team represented by this player has won the championship. In contrast, there is a championship between MVP and FMVP, and whoever has high gold content will be judged.
In addition, the MVP is selected directly from more than 4 players in the whole league, and the whole environment is relatively complicated, because there may be several players of the same level at the same time, and there will be many disputes about who is elected. The FMVP is screened in four rounds of series until the team with the most outstanding performance standing on the highest podium is selected, and the threshold is gradually raised, so Excellence is such a truth. Therefore, MVP proves a player's personal strength, while FMVP proves that he has the strength to lead the team to win the championship. Who is more important? Obviously the latter.
According to normal logic, what is the goal pursued by basketball players? In addition to making enough money, getting on the top podium will be something they want to do all their lives. Therefore, regular season MVP will not be their focus. On this basis, FMVP is their goal. People's desire to get FMVP is far more important than getting MVP, because one they represent is to complete their dreams and the other is to be close to their dreams. From this point of view, the gold content of FMVP will undoubtedly be several times heavier than that of MVP.
In the history of NBA, there are many players who have won the MVP but not the FMVP. These players have the same characteristics, that is, they are unable to keep up with their careers and have no special historical position, but they are better than many players. If they can win another FMVP in their lifetime, the situation may be very different. So it can be said that MVP is a ticket for a player to enter the ranks of superstars, but FMVP is the ultimate weapon to make you a superstar. If a player has both MVP and FMVP, then a celebrity