A group of slow-witted people downstairs started an air raid yesterday. I watched the video so as not to lose an important ally in the Middle East.
Why did Russia bomb Syria at the beginning of the war?
For Russia's interests in the Middle East .....................................
As we all know, although the positions of the United States and Russia in Syria are opposite, they are consistent in combating IS extreme armed forces. Including France, it was also the first air strike against IS in Syria recently. Now it seems that Russia does not want to send troops on the ground, but it is also "speaking loudly" like the United States. In fact, it is Putin's cautious and limited intervention to avoid the expansion of the situation, and its purpose is only intervention. As for the effect, it absolutely depends on the needs of the situation and the reaction of the United States. This is definitely a political war.
The fight against IS in Syria shows that Putin is still very smart because it is an enemy of the whole world. There is no reason for the United States to interfere. On the contrary, we can only adopt an encouraging attitude, and Russia will naturally participate in the core of international hot issues. It means that Europe didn't think of a complete solution to the Syrian problem until it encountered a wave of refugees. It is impossible without Russian cooperation. I support the legitimate * * *, and you support the Syrian opposition. Although I support Bashar * * *, I have not attacked the Syrian opposition armed forces that you support. The only thing I play is. You can't say that air strikes against IS are your patent.
Therefore, it can only be seen from this point that the political significance of Russia's air strikes against Syria is far greater than the military significance. It is not to drive IS out of Syria or completely eliminate "* * * countries", but only to express the presence of Russia in solving international hot issues. Without Russia's cooperation, the west will not act arbitrarily.
Therefore, we can judge that Putin's air strikes against is in Syria are while the iron is hot. Since military intervention has been announced, certain actions must be taken. Putin has a firm attitude, does not drag his feet, and must do what he looks for. This is his character, resourceful. Therefore, he never frowns at Obama, because he has many clever ways to deal with it, and they are all big moves that are impatient and don't play Tai Chi, and you have to accept them.
Next, it depends on the attitude of the United States. I don't think the United States will react much, because the United States has the ability and doesn't want to get too involved in Syria, otherwise Bashar would have fallen. In the eyes of the United States, the reason why air strikes against IS are limited is to store its threat to the Bashar regime in Syria. In the next step, if the United States reacts violently because of Russia's open intervention in Syria, it will be easy to launch a military confrontation with Russia, which is absolutely not in the interest of the United States. I think the next step of the United States can only presuppose Russia's strong position on the Syrian issue and let Putin enjoy the repressed * * *.
Why did Russian air strike Syria by 20 points?
Support Europe and the United States against * * armed forces, military * * *, the relationship between Syria and Russia can be, but orthodoxy has fallen, and Western support for puppets is not good for them!
Why did Russia bomb Syria?
1, please America, fight terrorists. Russia's diplomatic breakthrough after the Ukraine incident.
2. Support Syria and fight against the Syrian opposition! Shocked other ethnic groups in Syria.
3. Show Russian weapons on the spot. .
Syria is a long-term ally of Russia, starting from the Soviet Union.
Why didn't Russia respond to Israel's air strikes against Syria?
Russia's main rivals at present are Syrian terrorist organizations and Syrian opposition armed forces! He won't lose watermelon and pick up sesame seeds because of an Israeli air strike!
How to treat Russian air strikes against Syrian China?
What is the official position? Go to the press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by yourself.
Why did western countries bomb Syria? Is it a civil war? ! ! !
The civil war was also provoked by western countries, the Spring of * * *.
The United States wants to imitate Libya and foster a pro-Western regime.
Syria, the land of five seas and three continents, has an important geographical position. Although the land area is not large, it is still relatively large in Middle Eastern countries.
Oil resources, the west wants to control. In today's era, resources are big. At the beginning, the military expenditure of western countries in Libya was $9 billion a day, but compared with the oil resources of several trillion dollars, this was nothing at all.
Assad doesn't like the United States and doesn't represent American interests. It is closer to Russia.
The game between America and Rolle. Form an encirclement and limit Russia.
Israel is next to Syria to ensure Israel's security. Israel is a loyal partner of the United States.
* * * countries have always had bad relations with the United States, and Saudi Arabia seems to be better. The United States wants to build more allies.
China supports the * * * army, that is, Assad. The United States opposes Assad. . .
In short, the national interest is paramount. . .
Why did Russia air strike Syria and pressure the United States not to interfere?
Remember this sentence! Great powers will never confront each other directly! Unless America and Russia are out of their minds! Dare to fight nuclear war!
How many extremist organizations have been killed by Russian air strikes in Syria?
As of yesterday, the Russian army has bombed: 7 1 armored vehicle, 30 other vehicles, 19 command post, 2 communication centers, 23 fuel and arsenal, 6 factories manufacturing improvised explosive devices and several training camps.
You can estimate the casualties yourself, such as the bombed command post, barracks and communication station, which will definitely be fatal. Heavy hair had been investigating here for several years before he shot. Putin comes from an intelligence background and attaches great importance to this major.
Da Mao also fought in Chechnya for many years before, and he has rich experience in how to deal with such guerrillas. You see, he mainly bombed fuel depots and command posts. He was paralyzed when he bombed. Instead, the barracks were not bombed. Anyway, the guerrillas are a bunch of thugs. If no one stops them and no one shoots them, it's the same as whether or not.
The day after heavy hair was bombed, Di Mei couldn't sit still. Think about it. It must hurt. That Russian is so evil that he blew up other people's communication towers. Guerrillas have no communication, so I don't know when they opened the door for villagers to pretend to be civilians.
It seems that more than 500 people across the street surrendered a few days ago. Such a high number of surrenders shows that the morale of the troops across the street in this area has collapsed. Personally, I estimate that hundreds, if not thousands, have been killed. Russians are still very evil, using expired bombs. It is said that Soviet-era stocks have been used, but they are not thrown away.
Moreover, it is said that with the current bombing scale, only 65.438 billion US dollars are burned every day, which is equivalent to paying only fuel costs. Expired bombs are not counted, and the money for destruction is also saved. He just blew it up, and it is estimated that China will reimburse him when the amount is large. In a word, if American brothers don't interfere, guerrillas can't survive basically under the present situation.
What are the benefits of Russian air strikes on China?
There is no benefit. Russian air strikes themselves are a spent force. To put it bluntly, it is necessary to save the Bashar regime on your own, and the result will inevitably be that you are deeply involved and it is impossible to solve the problem. Of course, it is not good for us, although it has no negative impact.