Google’s Android wearable device. This site provides you with more relevant information for you to understand this issue.
Introduction to the recent topic of Google’s Android wearable devices, I believe many friends are very interested in knowing about it. A good story can bring readers a lot of new things worth thinking about, and even < /p>
I believe many friends are very interested in learning about the recent topic of Google’s Android wearable devices. A good story can bring readers a lot of new things worth pondering, and even The reader's horizons can be expanded in an instant, so since everyone wants to know this kind of information now, today the editor will bring information about Google's Android wearable devices!
I don't know why, but yesterday was a day for Google peripherals. There are three or four pieces of news that are harbingers of future products you might be using with your Android phone. But with all the leaks out there, while it's easy to deduce what will happen with Android phones, it's still unclear what Google really plans to do with watches, smart glasses, or even Stadia controllers.
Google’s hardware division acquired smart glasses company North, following last year’s acquisition by Fitbit. This is a weird one! Google still makes Glass, but it has been earmarked primarily for industrial use. North is doing well in consumer smart glasses. I even reported two years ago that it even had patents from Intel's abandoned Vaunt project. But, like Vaunt, NorthGlasses' vision is clear and its business plan unclear.
It is worth noting that the Google person who announced the news is Google hardware director Rick Osterloh. So it might be more than just buying some IP. If you could connect a Fitbit and a North dot, rather than doing it under the auspices of the hardware department, you'd understand Google's plans better than I do. Two different products? One? Just an engineer who's good at making accessories?
Next, we announced Qualcomm's new Snapdragon 4100 processor, which will bring much-needed improvements to the next generation of WearOS watches. Qualcomm's latest smartwatch processor update doesn't speed things up at all, it just helps battery life.
About every year or so, I end up writing an article suggesting that it's going to take a while for Google to make WearOS more grounded than its other products. This was me in April 2018, October 2018, September 2019, and October 2019 after the Fitbit acquisition was announced. For now, WearOS is mainly a way for Fossil to enhance its brand image. It’s not a platform, it’s a billboard.
This is the same thing. Meanwhile, the Apple Watch is superb and sells well. Samsung's smartwatches aren't that popular. But they're capable, which is more than I can say for most WearOS watches.
Yesterday, we also saw Samsung's Galaxy Watch 3 software detailed in a new leak. I recommend the Galaxy Watch as the default smartwatch to Android users who absolutely want a smartwatch.
Anyway, please come back to this new Qualcomm4100 chip. It won't single-handedly save WearOS, but it's an essential foundation that will help future WearOS watches perform well.
Qualcomm's new chips use a new 12nm process, which will help improve speed and battery life. That's fine, but what WearOS needs is a hot-selling new watch with new features, good looks, and a smaller form factor that can take advantage of the new capabilities the 4100 offers.
I don’t know if Google has the desire or ability to make it happen this year. Of course, there haven't been any obvious rumors, and it will take a while for the Fitbit acquisition to produce actual results. I hate to say it, but the short-term outlook remains poor.
Even Google CEO Sundar Pichai thinks Google isn't doing a great job with watches, telling us on the Vergecast: "The areas I look at are maybe the work we haven't done, and maybe watches are a good example of that. We haven't done that." place."
Next, Google also finally made the Stadia controller do what it was supposed to do: work wirelessly with Android devices. I don't know if I still think Google should call Stadia a beta this year, but at least it's progressing in the right direction.
Last but not least, Google confirmed that its AirDrop competitor is finally here. By the way, this past time, Google did something to transfer files directly from Android rather than through a cloud service - hey, I also called Peripheral News because it was close enough.
Frankly, Google has not tried to create anything similar. It's still too difficult to transfer files from your Android phone to your computer, especially if you don't understand the current options. I think the assumption is that everything will go through some form of cloud sync, but for many workflows that's untenable.
I think the important thing to remember with all of the above is that you get a lot more early information about Google's plans than other companies. When you hear news about a new product transfer from Apple or Samsung, there's usually something to buy that's already around the corner. On the other hand, with these Google news, it will hopefully take months or even years to make improved products.
What appears to be slow development - the long time between certain news and the publication of results - will leave Google feeling that, despite years of effort, it's not good at hardware as a whole. However, when you see these puzzle pieces, I recommend adjusting your expectations. Additionally, if you're looking for examples of Google's hardware work not being planned yet, there's a lot better evidence.