There is no fixed format for the public content, and its purpose is only one: to write clearly and completely the technology you want to protect so that the agent can sort out the corresponding patent documents for you. There are five parts: technical field, background technology and invention content, which are the requirements for agents to write application documents, and are not suitable for inventors to write public contents themselves. Moreover, it is estimated that inventors who have never applied for a patent are not very clear about what these five titles mean, and what are the requirements of the patent law for each of the five parts. The requirements in the patent law are different from what most people understand.
Most inventors, especially those who haven't applied for a patent, often focus on how good my technology is, how much more advanced it is than others, and so on. In fact, although such content is necessary for the agent, it is not the most important.
The most important thing is what parts your product includes, what kind of connection between each part, whether they convey some information, what function each part performs in this product and what role it plays. Rather than this product is very convenient to use, simple structure and so on. . .
If your technology is method technology, then write what this method does first, then what it does, what it does finally, and what results it gets; Each step should be logically rigorous and clearly described, and the cart before the horse should not be put. It is necessary to write clearly what information each step is dealing with. It is not that this method is flexible and efficient to implement, and so on. . .
If the technology is complicated, you can use the product schematic diagram or method flow chart to help clear your mind and explain the text.
These are what the disclosure should focus on.