Text/talk about technology
Enterprises look at interests, and commercial interaction is only a commercial behavior based on commercial interests. Do you really think there is a great hatred between people? At that time, Xiaomi also released many products using Huawei Hisilicon processors, such as the following car recorder.
Xiaomi doesn't like to use some Huawei technologies because Xiaomi and Huawei have direct competition in too many fields, such as TV. Suppose Xiaomi uses a Hisilicon chip, there will be a situation-
You sell TV, I also sell TV, and then my TV will use the chip you developed, and I will promote it to you on the publicity page. Is Xiaomi full? Believe me, if you were Manager Lei, you wouldn't do such a thing.
Therefore, enterprises often choose a company that has no direct competition with themselves as the core supplier, such as Qualcomm, which only provides chipsets and does not directly manufacture mobile phones; Google only provides systems and does not participate in the research and development of mobile phones (Google's Pixel is not listed in China at all, and its size is very small).
Therefore, at this stage, as a referee and player, it is basically unrealistic for Huawei to ask other large mobile phone companies to actively support the HarmonyOS system, especially Xiaomi, because its major industries have direct competition with the HarmonyOS system.
Because what is the vision of HarmonyOS system? It is an underlying standard in the Internet of Things era. A simple understanding is to let all future home appliances have built-in HarmonyOS system core, so as to realize real intelligent linkage of the whole house (HarmonyOS system has good multi-terminal adaptability, covering KB-class, MB-class and GB-class equipment, and has ultra-low time research).
Xiaomi's AIOT strategy is the same. Recently, Xiaomi has indeed pulled out a set of Internet of Things system-Xiaomi Vela Internet of Things embedded system, which uses NuttX kernel. The essence of developing this set of Internet of Things system is to let other store brands access Xiaomi's AIOT ecosystem (that is, Little Love Intelligent Awakening). ).
The Internet of Things system developed by Xiaomi is obviously aimed at the HarmonyOS system, with a clear goal, because as we all know, in the post-mobile phone era, smart homes and new energy vehicles are the two biggest outlets, and Xiaomi will certainly not ignore them.
Moreover, from the perspective of product coverage and sales, Xiaomi's AIOT equipment is the leader in the domestic smart home industry, even stronger than Huawei. Therefore, it is definitely impossible for Xiaomi to give such a big opportunity to Huawei. Because as we all know, after the establishment of standards, it is lying down to make money, and it is making a lot of money. Who doesn't want to lie down and make money?
Not only Xiaomi and Huawei, but also many industry giants have laid out the Internet of Things system at this time. Google's Fuchsia OS, Amazon's AWS LOT system, Microsoft, Apple, Samsung and so on actually have related technical systems.
In other words, the Internet of Things has accommodated many players at this stage, and they are all competing on the same stage. As for who can stand out, it depends on the nature of this system.
The reason why the system can be called the existence of a standard is because the market of the system is prone to oligarchy.
The more users a system has, the more sound its ecology will be, and a sound ecology will consolidate the status of this system, and over time, it will form a monopoly and oligarchy, as is the case with Windows, Android and IOS.
Don't be afraid to see monopoly. Monopoly is only a description of a commercial phenomenon, and it is not necessarily bad. It is harmful to use monopoly position to implement monopoly behavior. (ALBB was investigated not because of his monopoly, but because it used its monopoly market position to implement monopolistic behavior. )
In fact, for our consumers, pure monopoly actually has more advantages than disadvantages.
Take the Internet of Things as an example. Now the Internet of Things system on the market is very fragmented. Every home appliance brand has its own set of standards, and the result is that it goes its own way. The Gree air conditioner I bought can only be operated by Gree's APP, and Midea's refrigerator can only be operated by Midea's APP. There is no effective interaction between the two devices. If you want to build a real smart home, you can only buy products under one brand. Is this experience really good? Not so good.
But if the Internet of Things system is unified, the result will be different, and all devices should be connected to the unified system. At this time, no matter what brand of home appliances you buy, you can control them through an entrance, and the equipment can also be linked. This kind of experience is real-"the Internet of Everything".
Therefore, if the HarmonyOS OS can unify the Internet of Things market in the future, Xiaomi can only access the HarmonyOS system, and has no choice.
Of course, if Xiaomi's VELA system is finally unified, it is normal for Huawei to fully embrace VELA, but now, Huawei's HarmonyOS system has a higher winning rate.
In short, Xiaomi VELA and Huawei's HarmonyOS OS are products made by our China company, which is the first time that our country has the confidence and ability to compete with international enterprises for the decision-making power of the underlying system standards. It is not easy to take this step. As for other aspects, let the market make the decision.
Business choice, not moral kidnapping.
This question is suspected of disorderly rhythm and should be approved first!
Who criticized Xiaomi? !
Are a group of "boiling" factory executives "going in the wrong direction"?
Since HarmonyOS System 2 (version 2.0 of HarmonyOS system operating system, hereinafter referred to as "HarmonyOS system") was officially released on June 2nd, early adopters have given a high evaluation. Generally speaking, the system is extremely smooth, more power-saving, less memory, more beautiful icon design and so on.
Therefore, many users are concerned about whether other domestic manufacturers will access HarmonyOS system.
For Xiaomi, accessing HarmonyOS system involves two aspects: mobile phones and watches, air conditioners, washing machines, tablets, televisions, routers and other equipment.
Let's talk about mobile phones first, and let's analyze them together.
It is reported that Android accounts for nearly 70% and iOS accounts for nearly 20%. It can be seen how influential Android is, with a huge number of Android devices and the largest number of Android application developers.
The emergence of a system is related to two aspects: one is the number of system developers, and the other is the number of patents owned by the system.
Obviously, Huawei's current system patent reserve is no problem. The question is whether we can win, the market survival line 16%.
For mobile phone manufacturers, it seems too risky to install HarmonyOS system now, especially for mobile phones sold abroad (almost all of them need to be equipped with Google's family bucket). A sudden switch to HMS will inevitably lead to the loss of foreign markets, which runs counter to Google. Can domestic mobile phone manufacturers resist Google?
Xiaomi's criticism is only the charging problem of the recent 200W mobile phone. In my opinion, the problem is not very big. On June 1 1 day, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the National Development and Reform Commission also organized 100 more than one diplomatic envoy to China to visit Yizhuang Xiaomi Industrial Park.
My analysis is:
1, some domestic old man-machine may be equipped with HarmonyOS system first, after all, their market is in China;
2, 2 years later or launch a mobile phone equipped with HarmonyOS system to test the water market.
It is understandable that they will not survive for their own enterprises for the time being, and there is competition among enterprises.
Second, ecological products.
165438+20201On October 5th, Xiaomi Company released Xiaomi Vela software platform at MIDC2020 developer conference. Xiaomi Vela software platform is an IOT software platform based on open source embedded operating system NuttX. Like HarmonyOS system, Xiaomi Vela software platform can also run on various chip platforms, focusing on the software platform suitable for IOT devices.
This is a little awkward. Everyone is trying to connect Internet of Things devices. Everyone wants to go to the front. Moreover, the number of IOT devices accessed by Xiaomi IOT platform has exceeded 276,543.8 billion +0 billion. Opal Lighting, Lei Lighting and other enterprises have opened their works with Mijia Zone, which can be connected and controlled through Xiaomi's Mijia APP.
In this way, Xiaomi will naturally not give up the current achievements. This is a waste of money, energy and brain power. Can you give up easily? As I said, Mijia is the independent property right of Xiaomi. If we change the HarmonyOS system again, we have to rewrite the program.
Therefore, judging from Xiaomi's smart devices, HarmonyOS system will not be installed in a short time.
So, will Xiaomi fall into the arms of HarmonyOS system?
It is possible, mainly depending on the development of HMS. If it is in an absolute monopoly position like Microsoft and Android, are there other domestic mobile phone manufacturers such as Xiaomi? Unless you carve up the world and gain a foothold in the market, you will follow others.
In fact, domestic mobile phones use HarmonyOS system in China, 70% of foreign export models are Android system and 30% are HarmonyOS system, and then the quantity is allocated according to the sales volume.
Not at this stage. Xiaomi will compete with Samsung, Apple and domestic oppo to help Huawei out of the predicament. China is not/kloc-China 0/00 years ago! HarmonyOS system: Xiaomi, oppo, Meizu and other domestic brands have all seen the high-tech future of China ... but China must endure these tortures! Because there is still a big gap between China's industrial base and advanced developed countries ... domestic mobile phones such as Xiaomi and oppo need to bear the burden of humiliation! We should not only cheer for China! And called Miou!
Where did you see Xiaomi being criticized? In addition, also based on ASOP system, MIUI has one more street than HarmonyOS system. With this advanced system, who will use the backward system? As for the Internet of Everything, Xiaomi is the boss of the industry. Will it move closer to a scum? !
Does it dare? I dare not at all. Last time Xiaomi added a rifle and vomited blood! If the United States really banned it, it closed down the next day.
I once joked with my friends that Huawei HarmonyOS system must cooperate with domestic mobile phone manufacturers. It will take at least five years to build this ecology by Huawei alone. If all China mobile phone manufacturers, Qi Xin, work together, it will instantly become the third largest mobile phone operating system in the world.
Other manufacturers will give benefits if they don't follow up, and they will be bombarded by crazy public opinion if they don't follow up.