1963, Australian doctor Bloomberg found something called surface antigen from a hepatitis patient. Later, in 197 1 year, a British researcher named Dan scanned the serum of hepatitis patients with an electron microscope and found that a large bubble was covered with a small bubble, which was wrapped with such a small circular DNA. Then he took another photo and sent it. However, it is very inconvenient for hepatitis patients to be examined by electron microscope, which leads to the relatively easy use of antigen-antibody testing methods in hospitals, which is also commonly known as the dichotomy test, which is essentially the same as the blood group test. Note that there is a premise that is often overlooked, that is, earlier doctors met "patients" who were obviously uncomfortable and needed help, that is, treatment. Hepatitis B virus was found in hepatitis "patients" with uncomfortable symptoms. Today, physical examination has become popular, and many units organize some healthy employees every year, in other words, healthy people without uncomfortable symptoms to have physical examination. From these healthy people, through antigen-antibody analysis, we also found "hepatitis B" patients with no inflammation of the liver. The diagnosis result of this physical examination obviously contradicts the objective facts. However, as a new phenomenon, medicine always needs to give a definition and explanation. Therefore, for people who have a physical examination, or people who have no symptoms of hepatitis in essence, the "virus" positive reaction found in this population by antigen-antibody detection method can not be called hepatitis B patients, but can only be called hepatitis B virus carriers. This definition or explanation is far from "hepatitis".
When the detection method based on antigen-antibody principle was introduced to China in 1970s, it was found that as many as ten healthy people would encounter a hepatitis B "patient". According to the understanding of medical theory at that time, if there is hepatitis B virus in the human body, it does not mean that the liver has inflammation. How terrible it is that one in ten healthy people is a hepatitis patient! However, it can be proved that this understanding is completely wrong at present. Because of the popularity of "1992" in China's health examination, a large number of healthy people with no inflammation of the liver were found, and they are now called hepatitis B virus carriers.
For example, you may easily understand that everyone has bacteria in their nasal cavity. It can be said that everyone is a "bacterial carrier", but can it be concluded that everyone is a rhinitis patient? The so-called hepatitis B virus is found in patients with hepatitis, and hepatitis is the premise. But healthy people's liver is not inflamed, and there will be no uncomfortable manifestations of liver inflammation. What big three yang or small three yang can not be used for physical examination to diagnose liver inflammation, such as premarital examination. Simply think again. If there is any discomfort, I guess I will definitely go to a tertiary hospital to see a doctor first and let the doctor solve this discomfort, right? Who will go to a health care hospital for premarital examination when they are not feeling well? Isn't the difference between a disease state and a healthy state that the former is uncomfortable? Think again that the principle of two and a half tests is the same as checking blood type. On the other hand, if you are type A blood, that is, A antigen positive, can you diagnose what disease it is? For people with O blood, both A and B antigens are negative. Can you say that people with type O blood are healthier than people with type A or B blood? Then what infection will happen if antigen A or B is positive? These are all common sense questions. I think you can simply get the correct answer.
However, this was not the case when hepatitis B virus was discovered earlier. At that time, the doctor wanted to explain why there were so many people in China. At that time, it was understood that positive surface antigen meant that there was hepatitis B virus in the body. So there are many deviations in the formulation of policies. For example, pre-marital examination found that hepatitis B virus carriers did not issue health certificates, so-called hepatitis B virus carriers had to be treated and cured, that is, they could only issue health certificates after the surface antigen was positive and negative. Of course, in those days, you couldn't even get married without a health certificate. Then there is the food industry, for example, employees in restaurants can't work without health certificates, and then there are kindergarten teachers and doctors in hospitals. As long as the surface antigen is positive and all of them have no health certificate, it means that they can't work. Even if ordinary people are found to have "problems", they will be given bowls and chopsticks to control the spread of hepatitis B virus that does not exist at home. Now, all the above wrong policies have been revised. But there is still a small tail left, that is, what hepatitis B vaccine to inject for the infection of non-existent hepatitis B virus. The idiom too big to fail is prophecy.
Let's take a look at how the evidence of hepatitis B virus, which is exaggerated by Putian Department as a strong ability to catch blood and seal the throat, came from. The "advertisement" of hepatitis B virus spread through blood has been deeply rooted in people's hearts. Advertising is famous for exaggeration, and it is not an advertisement without exaggeration. Whose advertisement is it? Vaccine companies are also American companies that abuse patents and are completely irresponsible. Obviously, there must be blood transmission in medical blood transfusion. However, case collection is problematic. Cases of being "infected" with hepatitis B virus because of losing the blood of hepatitis B virus carriers are easy to appear in the current harsh medical environment. The situation that blood containing hepatitis B virus can be transfused without being "infected" simply cannot be reflected. This only records the infected cases, but completely ignores the case collection, which is not contagious and can only draw wrong conclusions. It is "100%" that hepatitis B virus is transmitted to healthy people through blood. As for the later Putian family, hepatitis B virus was described as a highly contagious virus with the function of sealing the throat with blood. Eventually, hepatitis B virus became a sexually transmitted disease. The small advertisement of willow leaf disease, which was originally only posted in public toilets, was washed by "American high technology" and ran to the online public media. The corresponding reality is that in the 1980s and 1990s, when genetic technology began to be used, geneticists extracted the DNA of hepatitis B virus and injected it directly into healthy liver cells, but it was impossible to cultivate a complete hepatitis B virus particle. Then, where is the strong infectivity of hepatitis B virus reflected in the objective fact that it is difficult to cultivate hepatitis B virus? Half a century has passed since the discovery of hepatitis B virus, but virus experts still can't raise a complete hepatitis B virus pill. This is enough to prove how many non-communicable cases have been neglected in the collection of blood-borne cases for half a century. Then how to explain the objective facts collected in the case? It's simple. Just find a transgenic expert to explain how small the probability of stable expression of transgene is. Therefore, the collected cases are not infected cases, but transfection cases in the transgenic field at most. It seems that the advertising department of Putian Department has given the prince the trick of exchanging civet cats for flowers. For this reason, the benefits obtained by vaccine companies are obvious. China has an average of12 million newborns every year. What a big market it is to popularize hepatitis B vaccine. In fact, simply think about it, the principle of blood transfusion transmission and the principle of injecting hepatitis B vaccine are contradictory. If hepatitis B vaccine has an epidemic prevention effect, why can't the "blood contaminated by virus" imported during blood transfusion be the "attenuated" live vaccine in the 1970s? In this way, how can the case collection reach the perfect position of "100%"? At present, the first generation of genetically modified hepatitis B vaccine is made from yeast that makes wine and also from yeast that makes steamed bread. From this perspective, yeast is not a high-tech term. Everyone has yeast in their digestive tract. It can be said that everyone is a yeast carrier, but it cannot be said that everyone is an enteritis patient.
At present, the objective fact is that there is no international unit to describe the infectivity of the virus, and there is no international unit to describe immunity. Injecting hepatitis B vaccine in neonatal period violates the relevant precautions of vaccination in immunology (it is impossible to produce antibodies by injecting hepatitis B vaccine antigen when the neonatal humoral immunity is immature) and the principle of immune tolerance (immature humoral immune system is easy to produce immune tolerance to the antigen when stimulated by the antigen). Moreover, the statistics of big data of kindergarten physical examination show that 40% of children are injected with hepatitis B vaccine but do not produce antibodies, and 40% of them are estimated to be positive for antibodies in their fetuses without hepatitis B vaccine. The remaining 20% is weakly positive, which can be regarded as the embodiment of the effect of injecting hepatitis B vaccine, but it can not reach the golden goal of 30% which is statistically effective. The positive rate of adult surface antigen in premarital examination was 6%, and most couples were unilateral HBV carriers. If hepatitis B virus is highly contagious, it is more common for children born to single-positive couples with negative antibodies. In the intimate living environment of two or three years, the positive rate of surface antigen in kindergarten physical examination can be calculated as 1% or 2%, but the objective reality is 2 ‰. The effectiveness of hepatitis B vaccine has become an exaggerated advertisement and a virtual fairy tale without statistical data of unit percentage under the rhetoric of strong infectivity and low immunity of hepatitis B virus.
Explain why China has become a big country with HBV carriers. To be sure, the theory of hepatitis B virus infection is not the only explanation for this incident. Let's make another analogy. Cicadas shed their skin in spring, and snakes need to shed their tights in winter to grow. For a large number of molting cicadas or snakes, it can be explained by the theory of molting virus infection. The genetic codes of cicadas and snakes are quite similar, so it is entirely possible to find out the organic mixture particles of protein particles containing genetic material-molting virus. But no expert will write a big paper on this topic, which proves that cicadas infected with snake ecdysis virus or snakes infected with cicada ecdysis virus will lead to large-scale ecdysis infection. However, the Department of Viral Infectious Diseases has published a large number of papers. For example, the genetic similarity between chicken and human reached 74%, from which protein nucleic acid organic mixed particles were found, so a virulent infectious virus of chicken influenza virus was born; Then the genetic similarity between pigs and humans reached 83%, and protein nucleic acid organic mixed particles were discovered, so swine flu virus was born; The genetic similarity between orangutans and humans reached 98%, and the organic mixture of protein nuclear particles was discovered, so HIV and Ebola virus were born ... Animals are the source of infection of the virus. When people have fever symptoms, all unexplained diseases can be found in an animal in the animal kingdom. The mixture is a virus, which is transmitted to humans after the animals are unsanitary. Unfortunately, in the SARS in 2003, the so-called virus genes were found in bats and civets, but is the source of infection bats or civets? Why can't humans do animal experiments and transmit the so-called virus found in human body to animals? Then there is the temperature of 40 degrees when people have a high fever, but this temperature is normal in chickens. It is a simple common sense in organic chemistry that similar temperatures, similar biochemical reactants and finally similar biochemical products are produced. It can be inferred that the so-called organic mixed protein particles of avian influenza are created by the human body when it has a high fever, and have nothing to do with chicken avian influenza virus infection. Because of this, chickens can be healthy carriers of avian influenza virus, but in humans, they will get sick and have a high fever. It seems that if we continue this research, it is really possible that molting virus will be born in a big paper at any time.
With the progress of the times, the differences between urban and rural buildings are becoming more and more obvious. The simplest thing is that there are many fields in the countryside and many roads in the city. There will be no heat island effect in rural areas, but the urban heat island effect is obvious. Relatively speaking, the days of bacteria in rural fields are definitely much better than those in hot urban roads in summer. In rural fields, bacteria live on the ground, while in cities, bacteria only live underground in sewers. Since the heat island effect describes the climate warming in Japan, let's analyze the situation of Japanese hepatitis B virus carriers. After the war, Japan was once a big country with hepatitis B virus carriers. In the 1970s, Japan became rich and began to use hepatitis B vaccine. It took 20 years, and in the 1990s, Japan threw the hat of a big country with hepatitis B virus carriers into the Pacific Ocean. China studied Japanese vaccine technology, but later became rich. 1992 began to vaccinate newborns with hepatitis b vaccine. It's just that more than 20 years have passed now, and the "miracle" of throwing hats through vaccination has not reappeared. Science is repetitive, so the theory of throwing a hat after injecting hepatitis B vaccine failed to pass the scientific verification of repeatable test. In the past twenty years, there has been no obvious statistical change in the percentage of hepatitis B virus carriers. The statistics of pregnant women's health examination in 2003 showed that the proportion of pregnant women with hepatitis B virus was 4.5%. From 20 14 to 20 16, the statistics for three years are still 4.5%. Neonatal hepatitis B vaccination began on 1992. The average age of a pregnant woman is 27. In 2003, pregnant women did not have the opportunity to get hepatitis B vaccine during the neonatal period. However, in 20 14-20 16 pregnant women, with the passage of time, pregnant women will gradually be replaced by people born after 92 (that is, those who have been vaccinated against hepatitis B in the neonatal period). Of course, some people say that hepatitis B vaccine injection was not standardized in the 1990s, and vaccine transportation encountered a "cold chain" problem, so the quality of vaccines was generally poor. Well, even if the vaccine is useless at all, without the protection of the vaccine, the statistical results should be rising year by year, contrary to the fact. Facts show that the effect of vaccination is the same as that of no vaccination. In other words, the percentage of hepatitis B virus carriers in the population has nothing to do with the anti-infection methods of injecting hepatitis B vaccine. Only three years' data from 20 14 to 20 16 show that the trend will not change in the next few years, but it is still unsatisfactory. The statistics continue. By 2020, more than half of pregnant women will be born after 1992, and the hepatitis B virus infection rate of pregnant women has not been statistically significant.
According to the statistics of the Ministry of Health in 2006, the proportion of hepatitis B virus carriers in China dropped from 10% to 7. 1%. This decline is usually seen as evidence that vaccination is effective. However, this evidence is problematic and can be completely classified as the first kind of false positive event in the process of first-class laboratory testing. The more correct inspection method is to recheck the positive results to eliminate the false positive caused by nozzle pollution. Early tests didn't check the positive results at all, so the percentage of one hepatitis B virus carrier in ten people must be mixed with the first false positive that hasn't been ruled out. The statistics in 2006 did not rule out false positive reexamination, so the percentage of 7% was still a little higher than the real target value. It's just that since sampling began to be used, in order to save costs, it can't be guaranteed that all grass-roots laboratories in the country can use "disposable" suction nozzles correctly at one time. Therefore, the first type of false positive caused by pollution is definitely much lower than that of the suction nozzle that was not strictly disinfected and reused earlier. It can be seen that the detection accuracy of the rich is higher than that of the poor, which has nothing to do with the vaccination of hepatitis B vaccine. In 1960s, Japan's rural urbanization was completed, and the heat island effect began to appear. Is China finished now? From the late 1980s to the early 1990s, in some places, cesspits were found in the urban-rural fringe. Developed countries in Europe and America must have experienced the stage of being a big country with hepatitis B virus earlier, but at that time, they had not found the particles of biochemical organic mixture called hepatitis B virus, but they just didn't know it. After the discovery of particles, people have been urbanized in rural areas for decades or hundreds of years, so developed countries in Europe and America can still be complacent without wearing high hats.
As proof of statistical data, HBV infection in premarital examination is sexist, with 3/2 males/females. Can it be said that hepatitis B virus will also "prefer boys to girls"? The original understanding of this data should be interpreted as the imbalance between male and female population in China, although there are many uncertainties in the unreliable family planning census, such as "super guerrillas" and "black households". However, as the published "authoritative" statistical data, there is only one item of family planning, which shows that the ratio of men to women in China is not unbalanced, or it simply can't reach the point where there are three men for two women. Well, based on the demographic indicators of family planning, hepatitis B virus can still be used. Hepatitis B virus is not contagious, but it is transfected and explained by itself. It is an objective fact that China was a big agricultural country when it was liberated. Farmers account for 70% to 80% of the total population. Needless to say, there must be more men than women doing manual labor in farmland. As for whether this ratio reaches 3/2, it is impossible to make effective statistics because conditions do not allow it. But the conclusion is still not that infectious hepatitis B virus prefers boys to girls, but that manual labor in the field determines that the probability of men turning positive is greater than that of women. Similarly, the age statistics of hepatitis B virus carriers show that there are very few hepatitis B virus carriers among children and the elderly, but there are many young people. This age discrimination when infected with hepatitis B virus cannot be explained. Because the theory of infection can be falsified by reducing to absurdity. Suppose hepatitis B virus is a highly toxic infectious virus. Before liberation, there were so many farmers' uncles and aunts working in the fields. Why did statistics show that only one tenth of people were infected? Why not 80% or 90%? If 80% or 90% people can fight infection because of antibodies, then what hepatitis B vaccine is used to stimulate people to produce existing antibodies? After that, the model of dry farming in the field can explain the statistical results of age distribution through transfection rather than infection. If Japan is an isolated case, please compare it with India. Although there is no condition to make a statistical survey of India, I am confident that I can also apply the model of doing farm work.
There are many studies on drug-resistant bacteria caused by antibiotic abuse, most of which involve bacterial plasmids. The structure of plasmid is too similar to that of hepatitis B virus, and the current medical phenomenon can prove that hepatitis B virus is about equal to plasmid. Simply put, it is medical knowledge that antibiotics can't cope with viruses, but plasmids that can't cope with bacteria have been ignored by * * *. The "plasmid" in mitochondria can be used for paternity test, and the big head of the dark-skinned human ancestor Eve can also be inferred from this. Mitochondria are archaea and have been integrated into cells for billions of years. Many plasmid-related studies have also been ignored by the small circle of medical experts. This leads to the fact that plasmid is about equal to virus, which has not been effectively proved so far. The knowledge of plasmid is described by transfection, but up to now, viruses still mistakenly use inconsistent infection theory to guide medical practice.