If there is novelty but no inventive step, is the patent still valid?

With the current examination intensity, since utility model patents adopt a preliminary examination system, they can be authorized if they are novel. As long as the difference is not common sense, there is a certain degree of creativity by default, but it is not stable. If it is invalid, it can be filed. Regarding creativity, this patent is just a certificate; inventions adopt a substantive examination system, which requires very high requirements for novelty and creativity. Without creativity, it is impossible to authorize.