The value of utility model patents is indeed relatively low
But if a patent can be bought for tens of thousands of dollars, then it is probably worthless
What is a patent used for? Enterprises compete, but enterprises themselves don’t need it? Dealing with it cheaply for tens of thousands of dollars? This is clearly a "trap"
The option on a utility model patent is 10 years? Why does it take 10 years? Isn’t it just for the benefit of the patent inventor?
......
There are problems in itself when one uses a patent to sell it. Why should one apply for a patent? In order to protect intellectual property rights, patents are exclusive, but patent authorization can still charge patent fees...
Since patents are to protect intellectual property rights and exist for the benefit of inventors and companies, then a person You can sell the patent in your hand at a low price. Doesn't this mean that "this patent has no use value at all?" Why spend money to buy a patent that has no use value?
Does it have use value? With the patent in hand, you are not afraid that no company will use it
If the inventor of the patent takes a cut of the company's profits (and part of it goes to the lawyer), who will sell it at a cheap price?" "Patents with practical value"
Small inventions are still inventions. Who can guarantee that small inventions will be worthless? Even a comic character, designing a cartoon character may be worth a lot of money and create huge benefits for enterprises...
Why does Abe want Neon to join the TPP and reform the Neon economic system (including legal ), in the past, Neon was a family-owned enterprise, which was harmonious on the surface, but in fact all the interests were swallowed up by the management, seriously exploiting the interests of the patent inventors, and naturally dampened the enthusiasm of Neon employees to create, and Abe The most important aspect of economic reform is to "protect the interests of patent inventors." In today's Neon Enterprises, if there is a conflict between the patent inventor and the company's management, the lawyers will almost 100% stand on the side of the patent inventor. From now on From the perspective of neon justice, the first thing a lawyer protects is the "patent itself". If the lawyer believes that the company cannot make the patent realize its value well and exploits the interests of the patent inventor, then the lawyer has the right to find a suitable company on behalf of the patent inventor. New cooperation has been formed, and Neon Lawyers now like this type of lawsuit very much, because it not only protects the interests of patent inventors, but is also a considerable income for the law firm (lawyers are responsible for the management of patents, and naturally their commissions are also It’s very impressive. I believe that many of my friends have very considerable income from patent cases, but perhaps many of them don’t know that patents themselves are a huge treasure for lawyers (lawyers’ incomes are very high whether they fight patent cases or not))… … … … … If the country tries to undermine Abenomics, the success of Aben’s economic reform and the recovery of the neon economy (out of the lost twenty years) are indisputable facts … … … … … Sometimes, do we We should first let go of hatred and see what the other party has done. Is there anything worth thinking about and learning from? The other party's failure is a lesson, but the other party's success is not experience. The choice of "crossing the river by feeling the stones" every day is really Correct?