First of all, car reviews are all for marketing. And marketing is to highlight the selling point of products. What's so remarkable about this? Find a few cars with similar prices and grades at random, compare the advantages of the car to be evaluated with the disadvantages of other cars, and then say a few unimportant disadvantages. After all, they are all cars with advantages and do not exist. But you let car critics compare with BYD. How come? Nothing is better than anything. Byd plays with the rest of the things, the standard things are more advanced than you, and the price is low. If you really want to pull BYD, you can only compare it with some intangible subjective consciousness. For example, BYD's logo, BYD's homonym, BYD's grade, BYD's after-sales, and what I heard about BYD. Actually, I support spitting, but first of all, you have to be the owner to have the right to spit. It's like you're bored enough to pick up your children from school and go to the school next door and say that your school is too bad. This won't work, and that won't work, so I send my children to the school next door. Is it interesting?
Because I dare not compare it, I am much better than it in all aspects. BYD also won, as if advertising BYD. Without advertising fees, it is best not to compete.
As long as you understand that everything in this world is profit-driven, there will be no such doubts. Those so-called car reviews all take the money of car companies to shoot promotional videos for them. As long as it is a cooperative car company, it will never provide exposure opportunities to a non-customer for no reason! If not, they are willing to choose a sales king of the same level to compare or touch porcelain! ! ! !
Because BYD's car is not on the same level as other brands, what is the comparability?
Any product is compared with an opponent who is stronger than himself, or at least with an opponent of similar level. Who will compare with products that are worse than themselves? Isn't this demeaning?
For example, Mercedes-Benz S, Highlander, Haval H6, Tesla model 3 and so on. These are benchmark products of the same level and will naturally be used for various comparisons.
On the other hand, BYD, which model can be called the benchmark at the same level? Don't! Therefore, no brand or model will cut prices and compare with BYD. Only BYD will compare with other brands.
For example, BYD Han, who came out some time ago, crushed Tesla in various ways, but in contrast, Tesla never said that he would compete with BYD and never regarded BYD as his own competitor.
Look at Musk being asked about BYD in public. He just smiled and said, Look at the car made by BYD. What are they? It can be seen that BYD can't enter Tesla's eyes at all. On the contrary, Xpeng Motors, a new force in car making, was sued by Tesla in various ways, indicating that Tesla felt the threat of Xpeng Motors.
So, your question is too simple. BYD's car is not in the class at all. Who will compare with it?
Slowly, you will find that there are only domestic cars such as BYD, haha.
We can pay attention to a phenomenon. Many car critics don't like to mention Chery and BYD when comparing and evaluating. One reason is low sales and low heat. Another reason is that fans are crazy. As long as they dare to say that they are not as good as other cars, a bunch of sprayers will spray you in various styles, so this is the main reason.
Because Chery and BYD are serious about making cars, they don't make great efforts in advertising, nor do they ask those car reviews to blow water. The money saved is used for technology development. In the patent application, these two families only have 1 and 2, which is much better than those who reach out and take it.
Because BYD's specialty is to make electric cars and plug-in hybrids, pure oil cars don't have much advantage. BYD's oil tanker engine gearbox has not been greatly updated for many years.
BYD is too fast to compete. Can't compare with it.