How to write the application form for college students' innovation and entrepreneurship training?

Looking at the whole table, the most important thing is the "project background" in the second part. This requirement clearly includes domestic and foreign research status, trends, research significance, references and other related background materials. To sum up, it is actually to let everyone do a literature review and then explain the significance of the research. Therefore, among the items in the table, this one can best reflect the level of the project team and the significance of the project research. So everyone should take it seriously. My personal experience is that this part must be written in an orderly way, combining literature review and research significance. Specifically, the literature review is mainly divided into two parts. Part one is a review of the research context, that is, a summary of the research done by the academic circles related to your research topic. The other part is a review of the theoretical context, that is, to clarify the research paradigm used in the topic you want to study and the development of related theories. Note that it must be written as "context". Because this is to explain what the academic circles have done in the past and now, what they have not done, what theoretical and practical achievements have been made, and what needs to be improved and supplemented. These areas that need to be improved and supplemented should correspond to the research you want to do. So the research significance written later can supplement the literature review. It should be noted that there is nothing about the research design in the whole table, that is to say, what you are going to do is not reflected in the table, so you must express it clearly before telling the significance of the research. Because without knowing what your project is going to do, how can the judges understand the research significance of the project? As for references and other background materials, everyone should also pay attention to study hard, because you will know your own skills by reading what books.

Therefore, the whole second item should show such a clear logical relationship: what have the academic circles at home and abroad done at present-what are the achievements (reflecting the foreshadowing effect of these achievements on your research)-what are the shortcomings (reflecting the significance of your research)-what are you going to do, how do you probably do it-what is the significance of your research-the documents you refer to (.

There are several points to note: First, in this item, the terminology must be standardized, accurate and academic. Try to use less spoken English, try to reduce "why, how, ..." and write "academically". Don't introduce the theory casually in order to increase the "theoretical". Don't understand the theory and method, or don't use it, or use it after you figure it out. Don't say anything unclear, and don't try to deceive the judges in theory and fact. The older the wiser. Second, the research significance should be both theoretical and easy to understand. If you can make some people feel that your research is important, even if they don't know much about your field, you will succeed. I have a deep understanding of this, because the judges you have to face when defending your project are generally professors in various fields. They may not understand your topic deeply. If you write too professionally, others will not understand the importance of your research and it will be boring to read. To give an inappropriate example: imagine that you may give a sociology professor an important theory of international politics in the next ten minutes. What's the point of listening? Third, when listing references, we must pay attention to relevance and academic norms. Put the relevant ones first, and put the ones with high recognition first. At the same time, there is no need to list too much in this part. If there are too many, it will appear that you haven't chosen many. Similarity is also minimized. If it's not material, try to quote as little as possible from discussions in newspapers and periodicals, because these are generally not academic.