All those who think this is vicious competition please answer one question: If this is vicious competition, what is benign competition? Is it healthy competition to cover up the Jerry-cutting of peers and cheat consumers with peers?
In a stock market, peer competition can only be a life-and-death situation
Gree put this competition on the table and took the initiative to let public opinion supervise. This is not afraid of crooked shoes.
If Gree's air conditioner has the same problem as Oaks, does Gree dare to do so?
While reporting, Gree also put himself in the spotlight. From now on, Gree can't make mistakes and cut corners, because once this is done, the accumulated reputation will collapse completely in an instant.
Some people say that Gree should not be reported on the eve of 6 18, which is even more nonsense.
Don't wait until the end of 6 18, and the consumer has bought the defective Oaks air conditioner before reporting it? In that case, it will not only harm consumers, but also benefit Gree. Perhaps this will drag Oaks into endless after-sales problems, but at the same time Gree will not win the favor of consumers.
If there is nothing wrong with Oaks itself, it is really unkind for Gree to report it on the eve of promotion. However, we should also see that Gree's report on Oaks is not a speculative guess, but conclusive evidence.
In the face of this "real hammer", Oaks can't organize a suitable counterattack for a while, and it's hard not to think that Oaks really has a problem. Otherwise, why pull any emotional cards?
I hope this kind of competition can appear more, because the more this kind of competition, the more consumers can use good quality products.