The real problem that mobile photography needs to develop is no longer the number of pixels. Xiaomi released a new mobile phone, which will bring a wave of glory V30 touching porcelain. Faced with such provocative remarks, Xiong Junmin, vice president of Glory Division, also released Weibo's opinion that "the linear development of mobile phone image has come to an end".
In fact, simply stacking optical devices and increasing the number of pixels, from the perspective of research and development, it is pointed out that other parts of the mobile phone can not meet the demand of high pixels, not only can not meet the market, but may even lead to poor performance of the mobile phone and serious fever, because "extreme pixel processing will bring extremely high requirements to the back-end image processor, CPU and storage bus."
At present, the global list of DXO mobile phone photography is Huawei mate30, and the glory V30 uses Sony IMX600, which is Huawei's strongest camera with the same configuration as mate30. Pro version is equipped with focal plane, which is improved systematically from optics, sensors, chips and algorithms. Compared with just looking at pixels, Glory V30 pays more attention to itself, and its existing camera capability is higher than that of Redmi K30. It is wrong to think that Xiaomi has been talking about pixels.
Compared with Xiaomi's takenism, Glory V30 is equipped with a powerful self-developed ISP chip, a number of core patented algorithms and a self-developed RYYB sensor, which is far ahead in technology. Xiaomi is still holding someone else's thigh, and I don't know how far behind. When it is in a low-level primary stage, hundreds of millions of pixels can't give consumers a good enough experience. I hope that Xiaomi can really think from the perspective of consumers, instead of blowing with "high pixels".
Living in such an era of increasingly developed technology, the pixels of cameras are also constantly improving. From 300,000 to 2 million, to 8 million to 20 million, and now to the mainstream of 48 million.
Many people may think that there is basically no qualitative leap in imaging quality. So 1 100 million pixels is unnecessary.
But this idea is really wrong. According to related research, the human eye is equivalent to a camera with 576 million pixels. Do you still think that 100 million pixels are useless when such data hits your face?
I believe this problem is mainly related to Xiaomi's release of a new mobile phone that claims to reach 1 100 million pixels, so blindly pursuing pixels may lead to unsatisfactory results. The mainstream SLR is generally around 4,000 W pixels, and the pixels of popular mobile phones have exceeded this number. But now it is recognized that mobile phone photography can't achieve the effect of SLR. The pursuit of higher pixels is obviously in the wrong direction, and there is not enough powerful back-end image processing, chips, CPU, etc. Even if there are 654.38 billion pixels, it is just a gimmick. Xiaomi also touched porcelain and said it was better than glory V30. From the product point of view, I'm afraid it's still better than glory V30 this time.
The real problem that mobile photography needs to develop is no longer the number of pixels. Xiaomi released a new mobile phone, which will bring a wave of glory V30 touching porcelain. Faced with such provocative remarks, Xiong Junmin, vice president of Glory Division, also released Weibo's opinion that "the linear development of mobile phone image has come to an end".
In fact, simply stacking optical devices and increasing the number of pixels, from the perspective of research and development, it is pointed out that other parts of the mobile phone can not meet the demand of high pixels, not only can not meet the market, but may even lead to poor performance of the mobile phone and serious fever, because "extreme pixel processing will bring extremely high requirements to the back-end image processor, CPU and storage bus."
At present, the global list of DXO mobile phone photography is Huawei mate30, and the glory V30 uses Sony IMX600, which is Huawei's strongest camera with the same configuration as mate30. Pro version is equipped with focal plane, which is improved systematically from optics, sensors, chips and algorithms. Compared with just looking at pixels, Glory V30 pays more attention to itself, and its existing camera capability is higher than that of Redmi K30. It is wrong to think that Xiaomi has been talking about pixels.
Compared with Xiaomi's takenism, Glory V30 is equipped with a powerful self-developed ISP chip, a number of core patented algorithms and a self-developed RYYB sensor, which is far ahead in technology. Xiaomi is still holding someone else's thigh, and I don't know how far behind. When it is in a low-level primary stage, hundreds of millions of pixels can't give consumers a good enough experience. I hope that Xiaomi can really think from the perspective of consumers, instead of blowing with "high pixels".
Pixel height represents the inevitability of the development of digital camera technology!
Nikon D70S thirty years ago, very popular! 6 million pixels. Is anyone still using it now?
Recently, I widened a huge picture with a width of two meters, only to find that the details in the picture are really awesome!
It is also a picture of Huangshan welcoming pine. After widening to two meters, the thin iron wires between the branches are intertwined and exposed!
This is to spend the same money to buy the camera with the highest pixel. I welcome with both hands!
It's about time. People who love photography/kloc-for more than 0/5 years should know best that digital still photography with more than 27 million pixels is tiger tour. This is commercial speculation's scam! A wise man should stand up and remain fair.
The pixel is high and the lens can be short. My understanding is that if there are hundreds of millions or hundreds of millions of pixels, you don't have to take pictures with a cannon lens. Just take a small piece of the picture, and a series of other problems such as depth of field can be solved by software ... the phone can't protrude too many lenses, so it is very important to improve the pixels.
Pixels are used by manufacturers to mislead users. Manufacturers use this as a selling point. By default, all mobile phones are in 4-in 1 mode. Few people will switch to the high pixel mode to shoot, and the high pixel mode has no practical significance when the light is good. Hasselblad's 654.38+ million medium-sized picture is only 50 million pixels. 1.6 million Canon 5D4 has only 30 million pixels.
1 100 million pixels, is it used to send friends or shoot short videos with Tik Tok?
Maybe the function of 1 100 million pixels is to send a circle of friends and shoot a short video of vibrato!
You don't need
99% of photographers don't need it.