The development speed of science and technology far exceeds our imagination, which is not only the result of the improvement of productivity, but also the progress of productivity.
One-step improvement has created conditions. Because of this,
Comrade Xiaoping will assert that science and technology are the primary productive forces. However, not everyone.
They all cheered for the rapid development of science and technology. On the contrary, there are quite a few people
Adhere to the view that science and technology are a double-edged sword.
Sword, it can not only benefit mankind, but also bring disaster to mankind.
one
Now banks use high-tech equipment such as computers to help employees.
Work, which not only improves work efficiency.
, reducing the workload of staff.
Strength, convenient for customers. but
The widespread use of computers
Bring other problems
Some lawless elements use various high-tech means.
Duan destroys computer networks and steals confidential bank documents.
Infringe on depositors
Interests,
Obtain illegal benefits. What is particularly disturbing is that
, with branches
Improvement of technical level
There are more and more so-called high-tech crimes.
, let a person produce a kind of
"A foot high.
,
The feeling that the magic is ten feet high. and
such as
,
Einstein's Theory of Relativity on the Peaceful Use of Atomic Energy
,
solver
The energy crisis plays a very important role. But it is extremely lethal.
The atomic bomb was also produced under the guidance of this theory.
,
Coming here has brought a greater crisis to mankind. A similar phenomenon is given.
support
"
Science and technology is a double-edged sword. "
According to. So when scientists successfully cultivated at the end of last century,
"
Cloned sheep "
After ...
,
Some people don't cheer.
,
But worried.
,
Worried about this technology
[Date of receipt] July 0, 20051
Abuse brings disaster to mankind.
!
Admittedly, there are reasons for this concern.
,
But stick to this burden
Heart is not conducive to improving our scientific and technological level. For example, cloning technology can
Organ transplantation and many other aspects.
,
Relieve the pain for many patients.
Bitter. But fear of being misused.
,
So many countries prohibit it.
Or restrict the development of cloning technology. Will this become a new one?
"
Give up eating because of choking. "
Is science and technology the primary productivity or the dual productivity?
Where is the sword?
It is not easy to answer these questions clearly.
First of all, we need to know what science and technology are. On this issue
,
teach
Shunk answered like this.
：
Science is a knowledge system for human beings to understand nature.
,
It is the spiritual strength for human beings to conquer and transform nature. Technology is life.
Labor means and technical methods in the production process
,
Is people's scientific knowledge,
The materialized form of labor skills and production experience. This passage is actually more than
Easy to understand, but it must be pointed out that
,
What is mentioned here?
"
oneself
However, the concept of "ran" has a wide range.
,
Including not only the general meaning
Nature in the world "
" ,
"。
"
Or nature "including human society"
Moreover, we are prone to make a mistake: we only recognize the research of natural science.
The research object is nature, but it is not recognized that the research object of social science is also.
Anti-nature, for example, when someone is said to be a scientist.
,
We'll think
Of course, I think this person is studying natural science.
,
Didn't even think about it.
People study social science. It seems that the word scientist means research.
Patents of natural science scholars
,
Is it worthwhile to study social sciences?
On this title. This cannot but be said to be a misunderstanding. this
[Author] He
(
1973-
)
Male, from Yichang, Hubei, lecturer of Hubei University of Finance and Economics.
Forty-four
Ho: Science and technology is a double-edged sword.
This misunderstanding shows that our understanding of science is one-sided. in fact
,
no
Scholars who only study natural sciences can become scientists.
,
Sociology of research
Scholars can also be scientists. As long as he is in this major
The level of the domain is high enough.
two
Mao Zedong once said: "There is only knowledge in the world."
There are two doors.
,
A knowledge is called production struggle.
,
One is called class struggle.
Strive for knowledge. Natural science and social science are the combination of these two kinds of knowledge.
Crystal. "Now a lot of people don't agree with this statement, probably think this.
The view is a bit "left"
"
That's right. "
All right. This view is left. "
"
Not yet
discuss
,
The author thinks that
,
This sentence at least puts technology
(
knowledge
)
about
The connotation is comprehensively summarized. in other words
,
A complete scientific group
This department should include natural science and social science. Only research
Study natural science
,
It is an incomplete scientific system. Only two.
Study natural science
,
Study social science.
,
It is a complete science.
System.
It is even necessary to change the name of natural science.
,
Because the Ministry of Science
The research object of science is nature.
,
The research object of social science is also from
However. In other words, the name of natural science should have two sides.
Say/make a phone call
,
Why do some sciences give the name natural science to others?
"
Occupation "
But it is difficult to change the name.
,
Because habits are formed by oneself.
Of course. So in this paper, natural science is only a part of science.
,
Such as physics, mathematics, medicine, etc. , but not social science.
But we should at least have this awareness.
,
Never let the science department
Learn to give science
"
Occupation "
!
Specific to the actual scientific research, also
That's right. Take the cloning technology we mentioned earlier as an example: cloning technology
Art is beyond reproach This is a science.
(
Technology), belongs to the category of natural science. but
Cloning technology itself and who will master it and who will use it.
Cloning technology and who it serves are two completely different concepts.
The same concept.
Cloning technology is a science that needs us to study. But who is in charge?
Master cloning technology, how to use cloning technology, and make cloning technology humanized.
Service is a science.
!
We need to study it more.
!
cloning technology
This is pure natural science.
,
But its mastery and use must be social.
Scientific factors. Only study natural science.
,
Don't study who holds it.
For whom?
,
It's not a half-baked science.
,
It's for science.
A prejudice.
It's a pity that there is so little knowledge and prejudice now.
Look: Everyone is keen on studying natural science.
,
For natural science,
Who has knowledge?
,
I don't care who I am serving.
,
Not for research.
Look into it. It seems that these problems are not for scientists to study.
about
,
Even if you pay attention
,
Just talking about science in a very abstract way.
Serve mankind.
Why do we need to study who holds the technology?
Who are you serving?
Isn't technology everything?
light
Does it still favor some people?
,
Discriminate against others
be
Yes, at least so far, science and technology are not shining.
,
from
In a sense,
,
This is even a luxury.
,
Only for a few people
Service. Many people disagree with this view. They insist that science has no country.
The world is to serve all mankind. This idea is certainly good, but it is a pity.
Very, so far this is still a fantasy.
There was an economist named Nike in the early west.
,
He once said.
In a word: (in western countries) the inequality of wealth possession has expanded.
Possession of knowledge. This sentence is not so direct.
,
such as
To put it bluntly, only rich people can afford it.
,
Nengzhang
Master more knowledge
,
People who have no money can't afford to read.
,
Mastered knowledge
Less. In fact, this is not only true in western countries.
,
China is no exception.
Intellectuals in the history of China
,
Most of them come from richer families.
The imperial court really broke away from the lower class.
,
Just a few, even if it is
This small part
,
also in
"
Learning to be excellent is to be an official. "
"
"The transformation under the quilt.
"
correct
Made. " That is to say, under the condition of private ownership
,
master scientific knowledge
An important condition is that the parties concerned must have sufficient economy.
force
,
If not.
,
It will be difficult to master the road of science.
Difficult and rugged.
"
"Teaching without class" is just a kind of private ownership society.
Beautiful fantasy.
Through these analyses
,
You can be sure
：
The connotation of science is very complicated.
Miscellaneous, part.
,
Is the wealth of all mankind.
,
According to Marx,
view
,
This part has no class nature.
,
This is the essence of science.
Property. All scientists can unite under one banner. in addition
Part of the content is not a shining light.
,
On the contrary, it has class nature.
,
Is to serve a certain class or group.
,
This is a scientific society.
Property.
Because of this.
,
That's why, on the one hand,
"
science and technology
Is the primary productive force "
,
on the other hand
"
Science and technology is a double-edged sword. "
It is a strange phenomenon that some people will oppose the development of science and technology.
Elephant. This can be illustrated by a simple example: many
When using a technology, it is necessary to transfer the patent to the technology owner.
Expenses. You can't use it if you don't pay it.
,
That's even less convincing.
Business. In a competitive society where the law of the jungle prevails.
,
Master technology
For the weak who have not mastered the technology.
,
Will it not be constructed?
Is this a threat?
What is science and technology if it is not a double-edged sword?
three
Through the above analysis
,
The author believes that "technology is the first life."
Productivity "this view and
"
Science and technology is a double-edged sword. "
Have their own limitations or one-sidedness. The former view does not consider science.
Social attributes, too optimistic. The latter statement is not good for us.
Ho: Science and technology is a double-edged sword.
It is too pessimistic to improve the level of science and technology. Therefore, the interests of the two actors should be taken into account, so technology will be used.
Put them together. Combining the two is not a shortcut to promote the development of productive forces, but not the opposite.
Fortunately, the predecessor did the work for us.
,
Only in my opinion, the greatest practical significance of our discussion on this issue.
But now many people have probably forgotten. This person is Lenin, because the significance lies in: after discussing this issue clearly,
,
We know that lowering
He once said that the primary productivity of all mankind is the importance of the education cost of ordinary workers and civilians. Nearly ten years
People, laborers. Come, especially when the government actually implements it.
"
Policy of "education industrialization"
Why do you say this sentence combines the above two aspects?
,
The education cost of ordinary people is getting higher and higher.
,
It's already here.
woollen fabric
First, science includes not only natural science itself, but also a considerable number of families who can't afford it. Why do you charge for education?
Master, by whom and for whom. And these contents have improved so fast.
,
Policy makers have their own reasons.
,
Like school.
It is about people. Talking about science and productive forces from people
,
We can't just say that there is a shortage of funds, but we should use the tuition fees collected to increase investment in education and so on. can
Result. Second, is it possible for this policy to increase school education funds in a short period of time as long as people master science and technology?
Learning technology will become productive forces.
,
Even become the primary productive force?
Plus, but its direct consequence is depriving many people and their children.
Not necessarily, because different people have different interests.
,
in other words
,
People belong to women's right to receive education and master science and technology. Since ordinary people can't
Different interest groups. Technology creates effects for a certain interest group. When the university enters the classroom, then the increased educational investment of the university is related to him.
Benefits do not necessarily bring benefits to other groups.
,
Sometimes, what does it matter? We can even analyze it.
：
Education investment
Will bring disaster. So we can't talk about human beings in general.
,
But the more they need to be refined, the worse they are. Because the more you invest in education,
What kind of person. Third, why only identify workers or overwork, so that those students who can enjoy these inputs can be better?
Actors are the primary productive forces, instead of treating all mankind as productive forces, and mastering knowledge quickly, these students will have an advantage in the competition.
And then what? Isn't that too classy? Indeed, this sentence is obvious. Those students who can't go to the campus for education are ignored.
The obvious class nature makes many people unwilling to accept it. but
,
The farther you throw it. The final result is that the country's increased investment in education is very small.
In the real world,
,
Who dares to say that he is standing on the double-edged sword of the whole person? Those who can enjoy these inputs have gained positive benefits.
,
The interests of the class.
Not only can't stand on their own feet, but people who can't enjoy these inputs get negative benefits. Most serious
It is very unacceptable to speak from the perspective of this interest group. In the long run, this practice will lead to a vicious circle.
,
Simple. Fourth, from the whole course of human progress, workers are tantamount to drinking poison to quench thirst.
Among them, it plays the most important role.
,
If we let them master science and technology,
,
Yes, because we originally wanted to solve the problem of insufficient education funds.
Accelerating human progress is the most helpful. fifth
,
What do workers rely on to solve the problem, but what is the root of this problem?
Because of study.
What about creating wealth? One is by physical strength, and the other is by intelligence. Is the physical cost too low? That's not true. The fundamental reason is the low level of productivity. I
Is limited, the intelligence is infinite. If they are not allowed to master science, people will think that low tuition fees lead to insufficient education funds.
,
Therefore, improve learning.
The improvement of technology and productivity is empty talk. Sixth, the standard of workers' fees. This makes it impossible for a large number of workers to master science and technology.
,
Will grasping science and technology in turn hinder the development of productive forces?
Laborers cannot master science and technology.
,
How to improve productivity?
If you look at a worker, this possibility exists. But from the whole height,
Productivity has not improved.
,
How to increase investment in education?
Physically, don't worry too much. Because of the interests of workers
"
What is "education industrialization" instead of quenching thirst by drinking poison?
This is research.
The development of efficiency and productivity is in the same direction.
,
The more productive forces develop, the more realistic the labor problem becomes.
!