Quote a netizen's comment that he talked about patriotism and national industry when selling products; Talking about internationalism when doing bad things, technology knows no borders ~ is this really good? The fundamental problem of Lenovo incident is that Lenovo voted for Samsung (Qualcomm), and the result is not important, and the process is not important. Yang said that patriotism should not be added to technical standards. If I send this netizen, will you be grateful when you need state support? Technical standards are very important to us ~
In fact, the whole story is divided into three stages. In the first paragraph, the minutes of the meeting flowed out. Qualcomm got the standard length code of 5G, and Huawei got the control code (short code). Lenovo and Motorola voted for Samsung (Qualcomm), Xiaomi and ZTE at one of the conferences, and many enterprises in Taiwan Province Province voted for Huawei. In the second paragraph, Yang made an explanation, but it was useless. In the third paragraph, Liu Chuanzhi's public declaration has won the support of many big names.
The most funny thing is the public relations ability of these two heads. It's not too big. An open letter goes to war. So are these bosses. Do we have to wait for Liu Chuanzhi to come out and support them? Why are you early? what do you think?
In any case, Lenovo's exchange of "Qualcomm" for "Qualcomm chip launch right" is itself a traitor's exchange of "national public interest" for "Lenovo enterprise private interest". This is a fact, no matter how Lenovo defends it, no matter how many people Lenovo invites to the platform, it can't be changed!
It is understandable for enterprises to choose the most favorable scheme for themselves from their own interests, but all this must be based on the basic premise of not betraying the country, otherwise everyone can disregard the national justice for their own interests. If this is not a traitor, then what is a traitor? Which traitor in history didn't follow this logic?
Let's start with the question' Lenovo is just one of them who voted'! Because you are only a part, not all, can you be an excuse to abandon your responsibility for the land under your feet? What is the difference between this logic and traitors who fled when the Japanese invaded China?
Do you know why two Japanese ghost soldiers can control a large group of China people? It's because everyone is thinking, anyway, I am one of them ... If ordinary people think so, it's understandable that you think so today, and it's unforgivable! There is a simple reason. First of all, your association is so big that you should take on more social responsibilities. Besides, your association relies on too many government orders to support you in China, and the price for ordinary people to support you is more. All this is based on one result. Everyone thinks that you are a national enterprise, but you have to do this. Do you deserve the title of national enterprise?
To sum up, I think: it is your own fault that everyone is sick with you today, and the shame Lenovo is experiencing now is your own fault. You can't blame others!
What Lenovo can do now is to reflect on itself, be ashamed and be brave. This is your only hope of rebirth!
According to the public data released by Lenovo, Mr. Si Manan, a free media person, made a systematic interpretation and analysis, independently put forward his own views and doubts, and expressed his concerns. This normal topic of public opinion discussion has aroused the enthusiastic concern of the vast majority of people, expressing their opinions and opinions. If Lenovo can adopt a modest and prudent attitude and consciously accept the supervision and torture of consumers, it will undoubtedly be a good thing for its long-term development in the future.
Since it is a big discussion, there will inevitably be a big scene with fierce language, passionate crowds and different opinions. China people's homesickness and ardent expectations for the normal development of large enterprises on the right track should be fully affirmed and responded. Mr. Si Manan's worries and doubts represent and get the support and response of the overwhelming majority of the people. Lenovo Group can respond positively to the focus of public attention with a highly responsible attitude towards the country and the people, dispel doubts and doubts, and exchange sincerity for calmness, which should be the best ending and everyone is happy.
Is Lenovo a national enterprise or a foreign enterprise? Are corporate executives entrepreneurs, capitalists or comprador? Is the annual salary of its management in line with China's national conditions? Has the enterprise ever made a decision that hurts national feelings and endangers national security? ... you have to be charming to understand ling. As long as Lenovo Group follows the rules and is on the right track, these problems are not problems, and they can be proved by facts and actions.
The eyes of the masses are discerning and fair. Before Lenovo makes a public clarification, before the relevant state departments make a final conclusion, and before the official media make a formal statement, everyone should wait patiently and not make any guesses and conclusions.
Humble opinion:
First, Lenovo was originally a pure state-owned enterprise. Through the shareholding system reform, it suddenly became a comprador private enterprise. At that time, the leading couple became major shareholders, which is worthy of China people's suspicion!
Second, even if the state-owned assets are still in the main share, the people will have the right to supervise, and it is natural for Sima Jun to speak on behalf of the people! The superior should give the people a true and comprehensive account.
Third, Lenovo's problem is not between Mr. Liu Chuanzhi and Mr. Si Manan. It is a problem between Lenovo and the country and the people. Because it must come from the country and has a large number of state-owned shares.
To tell the truth, as a melon eater, I really don't know if Lenovo has caused the loss of state-owned assets! But that doesn't stop me from paying attention to this. Whether Mr. Si Manan's query based on Lenovo's data is right or wrong, since it has a huge impact and aroused widespread concern in society, should Lenovo formally explain or clarify it?
In my opinion, make a mountain out of a molehill, avoid the important, grandstanding and associate with danger!
There are so many discussions about Lenovo, and the event is so fermented, mainly because entrepreneurs come out to support it. In fact, it's not a big deal. It was made so huge by Liu Chuanzhi.
In my opinion, a large number of entrepreneurs are also called unity, but they are just putting on a show, and some of them show their faces by the way, such as Jia Yueting. Is Lenovo so powerful? Because of a traitor accusation on a forum? Like a thin camel, he stormed a shadowless ant.
Lenovo is evasive about 86 votes. Liu Chuanzhi called Ren to express his understanding and sympathy. Do you think Ren Zheng Fei must be a bad policeman? Then it was quickly pulled to endorse. Then a group of entrepreneurs came out to stand in line and everyone expressed their opinions, but is it really necessary? Can be handled by legal and public relations means!
Among them, we can also see which enterprises are supported. Why didn't Shenzhen entrepreneur Malik Hua Teng attend?
Most importantly, Lenovo has become too bad. Recently, it was kicked out of the Hang Seng Index, and its market value has shrunk dramatically. Overtaken by countless internet rookies, executive compensation has been continuously improved. Is it really safe to hold hundreds of millions of yuan?
I really don't know when the nothingness of Lenovo will last. I bought several Lenovo notebooks for nothing!
Maybe my idea is a little outdated, but gradually many people begin to agree.
When people talk about "Huawei", their respect and pride naturally arise. Speaking of "Lenovo", I'm sure it was once brilliant, but I hate its present predicament even more. The ZTE incident has aroused people's attention to core technologies. With the upcoming promulgation of the 5G standard, Huawei seems to be the only Huawei in China that is worth looking forward to. When people suddenly heard the news of Lenovo's "betrayal", they all felt sorry for Huawei's failure and were naturally angry. After the outbreak of the "5G incident", Lenovo official website has officially denied the rumor, but the online abuse has not subsided. The reason is that, first of all, many people may still have doubts, and it is difficult to understand and too lazy to understand what the 5G voting is for. Anyway, there are various opinions on the Internet, and I don't know who to believe; On the other hand, the public relations performance of Lenovo's rumors seems to be somewhat inappropriate. At first, it was an ambiguous and emotional expression in Yang Yunli's fog. Later, Liu Chuanzhi used too much force to defend himself and plot against each other. It seems that all netizens are enemies. From the beginning, there was a lack of a systematic and comprehensive explanation with facts and evidence, as well as understanding and respect for netizens' emotions. Third, in recent years, Lenovo has done nothing in the investment of R&D core technology, and has made no achievements in new business areas such as mobile phones. The traditional PC business has been in a downturn under the impact of the mobile Internet, and the product pricing is different at home and abroad. Recently, it was excluded from the Hang Seng Index, and its business expansion ability was questioned. In contrast, online said that Lenovo CEO's annual salary was as high as 654.38 billion yuan, which left a negative impression. This denunciation on the Internet may be a sense of national pride and crisis in everyone's mind. I think this populist patriotism is not a conspiracy, but more of a "mob" group effect. Of course, it is not ruled out that the personal behavior of competitors or competitors' employees may ignite the fuse, but igniting public opinion also requires a public opinion base. The abuse of netizens is not all malicious attacks, but some are based on love. For example, there are two children in your family, and their academic performance is getting better and better, so they are expected to be admitted to Tsinghua Peking University. The family must feel proud and gratified; The eldest son's academic performance is getting worse and worse, and he failed in many subjects. The family must be anxious to scold him and slap him in the face. You will love and hate your children. Huawei and Lenovo are not other people's children in our minds. If the results of the college entrance examination are parents' anxiety, then the core technology is the anxiety of the whole people, especially after the ZTE incident. Investment in technology research and development is not only the core competitiveness of enterprises, but also the major social responsibility of national benchmark enterprises under the current situation. Huawei and Lenovo are well-known scientific and technological enterprises in the world and China, and we have hopes and expectations for them. However, in terms of product innovation breakthroughs and core technology research and development, Lenovo can really only use eight words to evaluate "doing nothing and making no achievements". It is reported on the Internet that Huawei 20 17 invested 90 billion yuan in R&D, while Lenovo invested only 4.4 billion yuan in R&D in ten years, less than a fraction of others' investment in one year. When the traditional PC business faces the impact of mobile Internet business, Lenovo's dilemma of insufficient investment or innovation failure is more prominent. So, what makes it difficult for Lenovo to achieve innovation and transformation breakthroughs in new business areas? I think there are at least two points: first, the success of history forms path dependence, which leads to the rigidity and solidification of enterprise organizational behavior mode, and innovation faces obstacles and resistance. Lenovo's traditional main business is "computer assembly". Its commercial profit model does not need too much R&D investment, and its organizational behavior model also becomes path-dependent, which makes it difficult for R&D to cultivate internal strength and make innovation and transformation difficult. This is like the book "The Dilemma of Innovation". Traditional large enterprises will encounter obstacles and resistance to innovation. I think the book "Pursuing Excellence" is quite right. Second, in terms of enterprise and entrepreneurship, there is a lack of endogenous innovation and enterprising spirit of assiduously studying technology, or enterprising spirit deviates from the track, leading to "technology is not as good as soul". Generally speaking, enterprises always want to operate at low cost, and people always want to do things in the most labor-saving way. Lenovo's behavior pattern is generally to buy when it can, and to buy when it can, instead of investing in research and development. Without endogenous motivation, enterprises will lack soul, and soul is a kind of self-awakening, autonomy, ideology, tendency, belief and motivation. For example, just like you want to create a work of art in your heart, the best way is to create, design, think and protect yourself. No outsider can do it completely or continuously for your inner world. You must have the core soul, core idea, core technology and core knowledge of "self" in an enterprise. Otherwise, it is simply assembled by using external resources, and its product is just an "inorganic matter" without soul, which cannot realize itself, adapt itself and evolve itself as vividly as a living "organic matter". For example, Lenovo can buy some Motorola mobile phone communication patents, but because you don't have your own R&D "brain" system, the outsourced patent group is only a static asset with limited value, and it is impossible to digest, modify, expand and evolve these patents, let alone create and produce a technical knowledge system with differentiated core competitiveness. To do this, we need to inject the soul-like input of key figures into the R&D technical team, and inject their motivation and belief, which is commonly called the role of subjective initiative. Has the enterprise found a key leader with strategic vision of product technology? Has this key figure really entered the core leadership? Do technology developers get enough independent resources and voice? Is the equity incentive for the designer's entrepreneurial partner in place? Or is the technical R&D designer just a hired migrant worker? What is the R&D team's recognition and loyalty to Lenovo? In different situations, the contribution of product technology developers is completely different. The heart can only belong to yourself, and outsourcing can't help you, especially in the era of knowledge economy. Entrepreneur is the soul of an enterprise, and the heart of an entrepreneur is the heart of an enterprise. Jobs represents Apple, Ren represents Huawei, and Liu Chuanzhi represents Lenovo's glory. Lenovo being scolded by netizens will definitely hurt face and self-esteem, but this is only a temporary heartache. How does Lenovo cope with the changes of the times and where will Lenovo go in the future? This is the event that really needs self-reflection. I sincerely hope that Lenovo, who can't wake up after scolding, can be awakened, learn from a painful experience, regain its glory, lead the times and create more glory. In the past, IBM, Apple and GE also fell into a "middle-aged crisis". Jobs and Jack Welch turned the tide, focused on subtraction, and transformed the enterprise. The strategic foresight ability of entrepreneurs is very important, and entrepreneurs are the soul of enterprises. The new era and new Lenovo need such a new hero, and I hope Yang can become such a new hero! Finally, Huawei and Lenovo are not other people's children in our minds. Hehe ...?
In any case, the result is unfavorable for the 5G follow-up standard voting in June. As for whether there is a behind-the-scenes pusher, we still need to wait for the official follow-up speech.
At first, it didn't attract my attention. As for the vote on business behavior, it must be more about business interests. In addition, Sino-US relations were not as stiff as they are now at the end of 20 16, so it seemed that Lenovo's vote was no problem at that time.
But now that the Sino-US trade war has begun, there is a feeling of rejecting the United States all over the country, so looking at the past from the present perspective will inevitably bring in the present feelings. Moreover, the price of Lenovo computers in the United States has been lower than that in China. Last year, HP dominated the PC market, and the acquisition of Motorola did not improve the mobile phone business. Lenovo, which expanded its performance through "buying in buy buy" and "selling property" this year, was also excluded from the Hang Seng Index. Everyone is more or less biased or disgusted with Lenovo, so it suddenly broke out in its present form.
Personally, Lenovo's vote is neutral. After all, I am not a Lenovo user. So I want to say a word from the perspective of 5G: Wait until the 5G standard is fixed? Don't internal friction in the critical period!
People can't be cheap, and they can't build a memorial arch. Enterprises can't sell, of course, they make patriotic money under the banner of patriotism, and then they vote for others in the blink of an eye. This is shameless!
Since you make money from patriots under the banner of patriotism, have you fulfilled your patriotic duties?
Do enterprises have the right to choose themselves? Of course, you have tickets. You can vote for whoever you want. Even I don't think I can kidnap you morally in the face of interests. I can't label you a traitor
But seriously, we will give the tickets to domestic enterprises first, and then to our competitors, so that Huawei will give one ticket to others. This is dishonest, especially compared with other competitors, which is a bit out of place at this time.
I don't know anything about technology, but I think both people and enterprises may still be what they seem. There are too many enterprises in China. Their technology is not as good as people's, and their things are average, but they can always take the country out easily. Under the banner of patriotism, it consumes the patriotic spirit of ordinary people, but it is another appearance behind the scenes.
For example, the boss in Hongmao medicinal liquor carried the nation out when something happened, and he questioned it.
When you question, you are unpatriotic, and you are harming national enterprises.
Look at Lenovo's public relations articles now. Is it really coming again?
I wronged the patriots. Usually you buy some ordinary quality goods in the name of patriotism, which are even more expensive here than abroad, but now they have become national flags.
For example, Lenovo's ThinkPad X240 sells for 768 dollars in the United States, which is about 4,700 yuan.
In China, the price of this computer with the same model and configuration is 5699 yuan, which is nearly 1000 yuan more expensive.
This is not a case. You will find that many Lenovo products are bought abroad, even if they come back with tariffs.
What does this mean? Patriots have to pay the price for patriotism. Do we deserve to support our national enterprises like this?
I ask you to make the product well. I don't know if your honor can be defended.
However, please leave this nation alone for national enterprises. Patriotism is not a foot wrap. Take it when you need it and discard it when you don't need it.