The main point of dispute between the two parties lies in the determination of infringement or non-infringement, that is, whether the voltage relationship of Juli Technology’s related products falls within the scope of patent protection.
In the technical solution of Jinyi Technology (002869) "solar power supply circuit for electronic automatic toll collection vehicle unit" protection, the core circuit design ideas include: the charging voltage output by the solar charging branch is higher than the backup charging branch The output charging voltage is lower than the voltage of the backup power supply. This design not only allows the solar power supply to charge the energy storage device prior to the backup power supply, but also prevents the backup power supply from being charged by the solar charging branch or the energy storage device, fundamentally eliminating the need for a Safety hazards such as explosions caused by reverse charging of sexual batteries.
Juli Technology insists that the voltage relationship of its products is different from the core circuit design protected by the patent involved. The voltage relationship is: the charging voltage output by the solar charging branch is higher than the charging voltage output by the backup charging branch. , is also higher than the voltage of the backup power supply, and there is no infringement.
During the trial, the above-mentioned three voltage values ??were mainly inspected. The final result will be announced by the court.