For many people, this is not an argument, but a "problem". However, aggressive Lao Luo and obedient Nuo Nuo Wang Ziru were brutally beaten by supporters or fans of the other camp. The biggest winner in the end is Youku! According to titanium media observation, Youku video is divided into 9 parts, and each part has a 40-second patch advertisement before the official start. These three hours are really profitable! Big! Yes!
However, in addition to Youku, the mobile phone industry is not without winners. The winner is Apple! Throughout the debate, Lao Luo proved that apples are the best, but I can't do it with a sledgehammer.
The following are the core points of the three-hour debate between the two sides:
In view of various details in the video evaluation of Wang Ziru Hammer mobile phone, Luo Yonghao pointed out or questioned the "factual error" in the video evaluation of Wang Ziru Hammer mobile phone:
1, foam function between the screen and the motherboard: In the video, Wang Ziru thinks that it affects the heat dissipation of the Soc on the motherboard; Luo Yonghao explained that it was for heat insulation, so as to protect the screen. Wang Ziru said that he did not say that there was something wrong with the cooling design, but only described the facts.
2. The function of the metal cover seen after opening the back cover: Luo Yonghao thinks that the decorative function mentioned by Wang Ziru is wrong, but it only strengthens the middle frame; Wang Ziru said that he does not deny that the metal shell has other functions.
3. The internal metal cover is not tightly attached to the back shell: Wang Ziru thinks that there is an air layer, so the heat dissipation is not good; Luo Yonghao explained that tight words can lead to heat concentration.
4. The function of the small switch: Luo Yonghao claims that it is used to identify the battery on the back, not to protect the data as Wang Ziru said. (Wang Ziru admits that the technical level is insufficient, which will be clarified later. )
5. Difficulty in making the sensor into a receiver: Wang Ziru thinks that the process is difficult, and Luo Yonghao says that the assembly is not complicated because there are professional tools.
6. Bare flat cable (with copper foil): Wang Ziru said in the video that static electricity may break the bare copper wire; Luo Yonghao said it was antistatic. Wang Ziru admitted that it was a slip of the tongue, but thought that the anti-static treatment of the hammer mobile phone was improper. In the 8000v test of Moore Laboratories, four of the five hammer phones failed.
7.JDI screen noise: Wang Ziru believes that in-cell technology is prone to noise, so many manufacturers are very cautious; Luo Yonghao, on the other hand, said that in-cell is not easy to generate noise, and took out the address of the technical document: t.tt/JDI.
8. The camera problem was deliberately misled by the appraiser: Luo Yonghao said that the white balance of the camera would be greatly affected by the shooting environment and shooting method, and the appraiser could easily mislead the audience; A few hammer phones can't explain the problem, and dozens of them need to be tested. Wang Ziru said that the evaluation of the two mobile phones is enough. They have a perfect evaluation system and can get relatively objective results.
9. Screen light leakage: Luo Yonghao said that mobile phones that perfectly control screen light leakage are extremely rare, and hammer mobile phones have reached the middle level in the industry.
10, screen color accuracy: Luo Yonghao said that mobile phone manufacturers do not adjust the screen, which is a matter for screen providers.
Luo Yonghao has proved with powerful eloquence that what he said in the past "to be the best mobile phone" is actually empty talk. What he wants to prove eloquently is that the hammer mobile phone has reached the middle level in the industry, and the best mobile phone in the world is Apple, which he once criticized. All right.
If the above core issues are still around the hammer mobile phone, then the following questions about Wang Ziru put forward by Luo Yonghao really fully demonstrate the eloquence of Teacher Luo in changing the subject.
1, Lao Luo said that Wang Ziru does mobile phone evaluation, but there is no public standard. Luo Yonghao said that the international professional evaluation will disclose the evaluation methods, but Wang Ziru does not disclose the evaluation methods; Wang Ziru said that the evaluation method is being patented and will be made public after the application is successful.
Lao Luo said that Wang Ziru was adopted by the manufacturer. Wang Ziru once admitted that his team had accepted the investment of 6 million yuan from Xiaomi, vivo and other manufacturers, but he also said at the scene that these investments had no impact on the independent evaluation, and the team was still holding shares. Luo Yonghao finally threw out a classic sentence: You can be imprisoned, but don't say that you are independent.
3. Mr. Luo said that it is not only the charging consultant of the manufacturer, but also the evaluation of the mobile phone, which is against professional ethics. At this point, Luo Yonghao also threw out a private conversation with Wang Ziru, and what Wang Ziru said became "evidence in court".
4. Lao Luo said that the purchase channel of mobile phone maintenance in Wang Ziru is illegal. Wang Ziru said that the parts were purchased by Huaqiang North, and Luo Yonghao said that the parts of Huaqiang North were totally illegal. Wang Ziru said that these accessories are of high quality, and it doesn't matter where they come from. Lao Luo said that genuine apples will not flow to Huaqiang North, and it is not idealism to do it knowing that it is a fake.
Well, poor Wang Ziru, in the end, was basically criticized and said sorry at the meeting. I was wrong. Aroused a voice of pity.