In this case, the business involved in the registered trademark involves training, organizing and holding training courses, and holding fashion exhibitions. (except advertising and other materials); Electronic books and periodicals published on the Internet; (Do not download) online e-books; Shooting, but not including advertising; Computers playing on the Internet; Community activities (leisure or teaching). The basic information provided by bilibili has nothing to do with judging whether the trademark is well-known; It also confirmed the popularity, publicity and popularity of Bili Bili and the mobile client, but it could not be confirmed that the brand had a high reputation in authorized training and other aspects.
What about the miles provided by the miles? Do I have to brush when I enter the station? Video, screenshots of bloggers with the highest number of broadcasts, and operations. , can not confirm that the trademark belongs to the well-known trademark in the licensed business. All the evidence on file can't completely prove that the quoted brand enjoys a high reputation in its licensed training. Therefore, the judgment of well-known trademarks in the Trademark Law does not meet the standards stipulated in Article 14. The defendant's judgment is right, and so is the court.
The plaintiff believes that if the sued trademark does not become the third paragraph of Article 13 of the Trademark Law, then the plaintiff's request does not belong to the trademark, and the court should confirm the request. In short, in the sued judgment, the judgment evidence of the national patent application agency is clear, the application is correct, and the review procedure is appropriate. In the end, the court ruled that the defendant Shanghai Magic Information Technology Company's appeal was rejected.