Apology is divided into three parts:
The first part is to apologize for the technical mistakes, shooting methods and language expressions in video evaluation. Several mistakes he listed were pointed out by Luo Yonghao 27 in the confrontation, including the technology of logo, the function of protective switch, the visual angle of screen and so on. The last item, Luo Yonghao once argued, was for the sake of "aesthetic feeling first". He said that "Zealer's evaluation is a serious comment", and rigor cannot be ignored for the beauty of the lens.
The second part is to apologize to Zealer team members. Wang Ziru thinks that he didn't express the achievements of Zealer's team in the debate.
The last part is the explanation of some arrangements for Zealer in the future. Wang Ziru said that Zealer no longer claimed to be a third party, and added relevant explanations to the prominent position and video of the website to explain the situation of Zealer investors. Moreover, in the future evaluation, "the measured data is objective and true, and the comments must be Zealer's comments".
At the same time, Wang Ziru also said that it will suspend the fee-based consulting service for manufacturers and stop video updates for some time to come. 20 14 At the beginning of August, Zealer released an evaluation video about the hammer mobile phone T 1. In the video, Wang Ziru pointed out some product design problems of the hammer mobile phone and possible defects such as heat dissipation and light leakage, trying to prove that the hammer mobile phone is not as perfect as Luo Yonghao claimed. This triggered a strong rebound in Luo Yonghao, and "booked" Wang Ziru's live video on the network platform.
Please see (Luo Yonghao PK Wang Ziru) for details of the event.
On the evening of August 27th, 20 14, Luo Yonghao, the founder of Hammer Mobile, and Wang Ziru, the founder of evaluation agency Zealer, had an open debate. The two sides launched a sharp confrontation on mobile phone evaluation, business model, independence and objectivity. The following are the core views of Wang Ziru in the dialogue:
Regarding whether the evaluation is independent and objective:
1, Zealer is also a team holding company, and the content production is completely independent;
2. In China, no one who tries to be a third-party independent evaluation agency can successfully raise money outside the mobile phone manufacturer-but we want to go this way and find an investor outside the mobile phone manufacturer;
3. Our value is to standardize the whole testing process and gradually improve it to make the products in the mobile phone industry more transparent;
4. Media investors and content production teams are completely independent, which is a very mature form abroad. Why is it impossible in China?
5. We are not judges and have no law enforcement power. We're just consultants.
Evaluation of hammer mobile phone T 1:
1, the power button on it is button-type, which is hard to feel, causing the button not to rebound;
2. The T1middle frame has a serious lack of protection for the front and rear glass panels, and the slender opening of the glass panel has a large span, which is more hidden than the Apple mobile phone;
3. It is a common phenomenon that the screen of mobile phone becomes larger, which leads to the compromise of strength. But the degree of compromise is crucial. If the compromise is lower than the industry standard, we think it is problematic;
About "Advice for Life":
1, Mr. Luo, I'm not teaching you how to be a man, I'm giving you some kind suggestions for making products. Where is seriousness and awe reflected? Reflected in the product;
2. Making products depends entirely on your own ideas, and you can do whatever you want. This is willfulness.
About "professional ethics":
After the consulting project of 1 (hammer mobile phone) was reported once, why can't we hide the problems found in our follow-up testing (saying there is no problem)?
I don't think this is a question of professional ethics. When releasing the evaluation video, the first object I am responsible for is the audience, not the product; I am going to make a consultation report, and the object I am responsible for is of course you (Luo Yonghao);
Mobile phone repair parts source:
1, we repair the accessories of Apple mobile phones, and purchase goods from the supplier channel of Shenzhen Huaqiang North. Huaqiang North came out of the factory through various other channels;
2. I can guarantee that all the accessories I provide to users are strictly controlled by our quality;
Our supplier is Huaqiang North, and our purchasing channels are completely legal. As for whether they have any problems, you can check their problems;
4. This is the status quo of the industry. All mobile phones are like this, even if they are bought abroad.
I don't think there is any problem in providing such service to users. Moreover, we have increased the check-in procedures to provide better service than the market. We may also cooperate with Apple when we grow bigger.
About professionalism:
1. As far as professionalism is concerned, I am really inferior to the people in our team. As you (Luo Yonghao) said, if you don't understand, you can make a mobile phone, so we don't understand, it doesn't mean we can't evaluate it;
2. Other people in our team have professional background, technical background and R&D background;
3. We are applying for patents for the whole test method, and it is impossible to publish patented things;
4. (Static electricity), (hammer mobile phone) has been lower than the national minimum standard. Five mobile phones were tested, and four failed to meet the standard.