How to evaluate the team of "Battle for Freedom" accusing Tencent of copying "the glory of the king"?

Anyone who cares about this matter should know the subsequent development of this matter. Frankly speaking, I am very disappointed in the battle for freedom. But that doesn't change my point of view. As long as the war of freedom has a patent, I still support the war of freedom. No. Why? I will answer the following questions one by one:

? 1. Isn't the Battle of Freedom still copying the hero settings of League of Legends? Would you dare to sue the glory of the king if you changed it? Article 2 of China Patent Law shows that inventions protected by China Patent Law refer to inventions, utility models and designs. Hero setting. . . It seems that it is not within these three ranges. . . I am not a law major, please let me know if there are any mistakes. At best, it is a conceptual design. . .

? 2. Didn't the Battle of Freedom copy the game mode and void ui of League of Legends? Although it is disgraceful to say, there is really nothing to say. Moba is a game mode, such as fps and RPG, and it is a concept in the game. If this is also a stain. . . First, League of Legends gets gg. Secondly, the ui about vanity. . . I saw the picture, and it really looks like it. . . However. . . Vanity is a foreign game, which is not protected by China's patent law. . . Besides, vanity didn't sue. . . Well, it's really disgraceful.

? 3. In the past, Tencent people ignored God and made trouble when they saw the glory of the king on fire. Is it really not hype? Yes, it is indeed hype. Not much to say, it's disappointing. There is nothing else to say. . . After all, freedom is a good game, at least at this time last year. As for the glory of the king, no amount of fire can change the fact that it has been infringed, at least once. But what's the use for players? It's fun anyway, isn't it?